Disqus - Latest Comments for pattydawn

Re: Domain Submission Service Sucks!

pattydawn — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:02:26 -0000

Wow, now I feel a little bad for picking on you. Maybe instead we should offer to help you. From my quick search of key phrases on your web site, it looks like you may have pissed google off. I didn't see your site come up on page on for any of these phrases on your home page:

Search engine optimization
SEO Positions
Cheap Search Engine Optimization
top search engine placement
Cheap search engine optimization and Internet marketing
Cheap search engine marketing for corporate websites
#1 search engine placement
Internet Positioning
Directory Submissions
Expert Link Building
Article Submissions
Blog Management
Internet marketing
Search Engine Optimization SEO
Amazing Search Engine Results Guaranteed!

Let us know if you want some pointers!

Re: Domain Submission Service Sucks!

pattydawn — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:49:01 -0000

Okay, enough bickering and my site is better than your site crap. Here is the bottom line:

1. The original post was about Domain Submission Service. They are a group of scammers and spammers. We wrote the post so when people received offers from them, they could Google the name of the company and see that it was a waste to spend the money. The reason for the post was not to attract so called "seo experts" and have them discuss their methods of seo.

2. The description of this site is "a consumer sounding board." We exist here for the consumer. There is no marketing of goods or services here. We give consumers some warnings, and the opportunity to share their experiences with products and/or companies. They other topics really exist for fun i.e. sports, politics, ranting...

3. Since we are warning consumers about domain registry submission services, and *now* seo companies, you are possibly going to get picked on. You chose to post here, sharing one of your seo methods, with a link back to your site. We both know that the real reason you posted a comment here was so you would have a link back to your site. That's fine. Instead of dumping you in the spam pile, we let it stay to use as a learning tool.

4. Again, you suggest people learn something from your blog. I will write a whole post on what they can learn from your entire web site. If I feel really ambitious, I'll use some elements of your comments here. This is in no way an attack as you said, but a learning experience for consumers interested in search engine optimization for their web site.

5. You chose to attempt to trash another company that was not involved in this discussion. We'll get back to that one.

**Warning to web site owners reading this series of comments**
seopositions .net uses questionable methods of seo on their web site. They have not produced results in the search engines for themselves, when they claim to be SEO experts. Please do more research on your own to learn about these methods. The information in their blog is questionable at best. Think twice before giving them your $600, $800, or even $1000!

Re: Domain Submission Service Sucks!

pattydawn — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:31:08 -0000

Yes, you are correct the domain name was registered in 2002. Anyone with any experience on the internet would know that registering a domain does not automatically create a website. The domain sat parked until last year. Nice try though :)

Re: Domain Submission Service Sucks!

pattydawn — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:01:46 -0000

I conquer...er, uh, concur! There really is no attacking, consider it constructive criticism

Re: Domain Submission Service Sucks!

pattydawn — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:00:21 -0000

Especially when they talk about Billy Mays!!!!

Re: Domain Submission Service Sucks!

pattydawn — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:56:56 -0000

Well, I just wanted to make sure we were only talking about one company's web site, not the web sites of multiple companies :)

Re: Domain Submission Service Sucks!

pattydawn — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:51:34 -0000

Yeah, um, I'm not sure which site you are talking about. Domain registration date does not reflect age of the web site. This web site has been up for a year. We have never bothered with SEO on this site. We're not selling anything here. The pagerank here just happened naturally.

We have others that have been up for 6 months with higher page rank. Maybe I'm not so crazy with my old fashioned ideas of content and links, eh?

Re: Domain Submission Service Sucks!

pattydawn — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:52:24 -0000

Oh, and you mean "company's"

Re: Domain Submission Service Sucks!

pattydawn — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:49:52 -0000

So Justin, you say you can provide clients with top 10 search engine results, but your site doesn't show up anywhere in the top 10. Oh, and your pagerank of 2? That's totally something to brag about.

Link exchanges are quite effective *if they are relevant.* Keyword rich content is very relevant. A site with no content is pretty much useless. Your tactics only work temporarily. They actually are a lot more work, because the whole nature of web 2.0 means you have to constantly go around commenting on blogs. Once you stop, the SEO benefits are gone.

Normally your original comment would have been deleted as spam... because that's really what you were doing, but we decided to have some fun and explain to people what your methods are really about :)

Re: Domain Submission Service Sucks!

pattydawn — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:01:00 -0000

RIght... kind of like how you are using your ability to comment here as a way of adding a link back to your web site to raise search engine visibility.

What you do in terms of SEO only works for so long. Once you stop going out and commenting up a bunch of blogs with a link to your site in the comment, you will drop back out of search engine results. Most companies that specialize in SEO try your same methods.

We are more interested in long term results. Try using keyword rich content, link exchanges with sites that are actually relevant to yours, properly coded pages, etc. The people over at http://www.servlet.com seem to have a very good method of SEO.

Re: Why can’t I get my fish drunk?

pattydawn — Wed, 20 May 2009 10:17:07 -0000

Have you changed to being Russian?

Re: Why can’t I get my fish drunk?

pattydawn — Sun, 10 May 2009 10:50:28 -0000

You're hilarious.

Patty

Re: Why can’t I get my fish drunk?

pattydawn — Thu, 07 May 2009 13:11:25 -0000

Very interesting comment Jessica. Too bad you didn't really read anything other than the title.

The link to your site has been deleted - unless of course you want to leave us detailed per fish variety methods of getting them drunk - then, you can have a link back to your site.

Re: Why can’t I get my fish drunk?

pattydawn — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:01:04 -0000

Hey everybody:

Not only is it illegal to get your fish drunk in Ohio, it's a REALLY STUPID IDEA!!!

All of you out there searching for *how* to get your fish drunk, STOP IT!!!

Do not try to fill your fish tank with vodka so you can see your fish stumble-swim into it's little castle or hit on the scuba guy! It's a very very very bad idea!

Re: I would take my .357 Magnum out for a bike ride

pattydawn — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:57:37 -0000

Interesting that one of the searches that brought someone to this page was for "How can I take my little pooch when I ride my bike"

If you are in Seven Mile, Ohio, you get it a bullet-proof vest!

Re: Ohio gun dealers seeing surge in sales

pattydawn — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:59:00 -0000

Jim

That wasn't an article. That was a letter to the editor with some quotes.

Thanks for trying though!

Re: Ohio gun dealers seeing surge in sales

pattydawn — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:55:08 -0000

And once again Jim, proof? Or do you mean facts like creationists do?

Re: Ohio gun dealers seeing surge in sales

pattydawn — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:54:09 -0000

The pont is, you don't bother to read, so you ramble on about irrelevant things.

Re: Just when you though PETA couldn’t get more ridiculous…

pattydawn — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:47:45 -0000

That is pretty damn ridiculous. I think they're going too far.