<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ozten</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ozten/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ozten/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:35:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Blog Rebuild: A Fresh Start</title><link>http://jlongster.com/Blog-Rebuild--A-Fresh-Start#comment-1512286813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool project! Maybe things are easier now that Googlebot executes JavaScript, but in the past doing client side rendering is really tough without hiding content from search indexes. I'm looking forward to that aspect of your updates, as I've seen Ember hurt a sites page rank (which was quickly reverted to server side rendering). The official Google "Ajax crawling" workarounds are gnarly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:35:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OS X 10.9.3 Is Toxic</title><link>http://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2014-05-23/osx-10.9.3-is-toxic.html#comment-1401515222</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We should invest our troubleshooting and debugging time in Ubuntu or other open desktop environments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Elementary has a more polished "Mac like" UX &lt;a href="http://elementaryos.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://elementaryos.org/"&gt;http://elementaryos.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Respect, to all the Linux work you've already done, of course :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 16:43:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Future of Communication Part 1: The Session</title><link>http://www.zythepsary.com/book/the-future-of-communication-part-1-the-session/#comment-1084353820</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to part two!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:48:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress.com Connect launches as yet another way to log into third-party websites and apps</title><link>http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/08/13/wordpress-com-connect-launches-as-yet-another-way-to-log-into-third-party-websites-and-apps/#comment-999460424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Persona is based on email addresses and works with any provider.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:01:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Identity Systems: white labeling is a no-go</title><link>http://benlog.com/articles/2013/04/25/identity-systems-white-labeling-is-a-no-go/#comment-876942762</link><description>&lt;p&gt;pzxc's post lacks comments, so I'll chime in here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;pzxc's tagline "web development predicts the future" is another perfect way to frame the branding argument. Persona *is* an API (and a protocol) and it's meant to be native in the Browser. When that happens, these branding questions go away.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The current popup is a temporary transition step, that *predicts the future* of how people will actually interact with Persona.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Give yourself the design problem of branding this popup. It's quite challenging, as we don't want this to seem to be a Firefox product which would alienate other browser vendors. But as Ben says here, it can't be an invisible brand for UX and security reasons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So we've created a neutral brand and encouraged other browser vendors to use the name, starting with the web based dialog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:22:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moving On</title><link>http://nigelb.me/personal/2012/09/07/moving-on.html#comment-656997881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations Nigel!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:17:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Node at scale: What Google, Mozilla, &amp; Yahoo are doing with Node.js | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/node-at-google-mozilla-yahoo/#comment-439291586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why does Google lead in the article title and get about 1/6 of the copy, but they are a "no comment"? If the article is about Node at scale, maybe focus on known, deployed systems...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: encryption is (mostly) not magic</title><link>http://benlog.com/articles/2011/12/21/encryption-is-mostly-not-magic/#comment-392466498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another factor to weight is human error by IT professionals. Data is the life-blood of businesses and if removing a single key could accidentally lock services out of their customer data, it could end of life that business. Bam!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;System architects have to be careful about where to put this key, disaster recovery, and if encryption is worth the risk feature by feature.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:35:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://breakingtheegg.tumblr.com/post/6835127034</title><link>http://breakingtheegg.tumblr.com/post/6835127034#comment-236997418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome idea! DOES WANT&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:17:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3frames</title><link>http://3fram.es/5sk#comment-169679639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:14:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ryansnyder.me/post/656889447</title><link>http://ryansnyder.me/post/656889447#comment-54001502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An instigator of bad judgment...  Indeed!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:09:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lifestream Blog Turns 3 Years Old Thanks to You</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/lifestream-blog-turns-3-years-old-thanks-to-you/#comment-40328198</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats!&lt;br&gt;I can't believe I've been reading  your posts for 3 years. /jk&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Really looking forward to your next post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brian’s (Purely) Functional Brain</title><link>http://www.willdonnelly.net/blog/brians-brain/#comment-290238803</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the points of Literate Programing is to free you of listing your imports first. You don't have to do that... Mention them when they are useful in your prose and then tangle them into the top of the source file.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:29:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: E Miller _ Note : jQuery Simple Multi-Select</title><link>http://ethanmiller.name/notes/jquery_simplemultiselect/#comment-16422626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very cool!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:56:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Ray Tracing Functions in Haskell</title><link>http://www.fatvat.co.uk/2009/08/some-ray-tracing-functions-in-haskell.html#comment-15949254</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a cool problem domain to learn Haskell in!  I see you're deriving Show for your data, you could also add Eq. It's really great how "just deriving Eq" automatically gives you an implementation of equality that is more than just memory pointers. Powerful juju.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:26:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Debugging in Haskell</title><link>http://www.fatvat.co.uk/2009/09/debugging-in-haskell.html#comment-15898173</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff, thanks for the post. I'm not a fan of debuggers. I recently learned about trace also:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://ozten.livejournal.com/6124.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ozten.livejournal.com/6124.html"&gt;http://ozten.livejournal.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looking forward to learning Haskell with you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:05:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reddit, TED and Sir. Ken Robinson</title><link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/reddit-ted-and-sir-ken-robinson/#comment-15735054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article! I totally agree with the need for better educational software. I've used Catalyst and another system. Very clunky.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've never considering a game engine... interesting idea. The web and business applications are tuned for delivering text, while games and 3d environments are less optimized for text. Example: The croquet project is a 3d world which allows you to embed a web browser or a spreadsheet. This is somewhat awkward.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For non-reading/writing activities game engines open up possibilities which aren't currently available, such as surgery, auto-repair, architecture, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm looking forward to seeing where you take things.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:18:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I+Quit+The%26nbsp%3BiPhone</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/07/31/i-quit-the-iphone/#comment-71469738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree 100%. I'm also going to switch to the Palm Pre sometime this fall. It's not 1 Google App for me, it's the whole SDK + App store.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) I had to send them court documents from 4 years ago to get my dev license (?!?)&lt;br&gt;2) Many apps have been denied, after countless hours of design and development&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've finally decided we are giving up too much control to Apple and AT&amp;amp;T.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Imagine if the original Mac OS or Windows 3.1 would only run "approved apps" and required development licenses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All "app stores" should have a "Unsupported" category which are accept 100% without review. Users are warned as much and no dev license is required to create the apps. This get's us back to the basic freedoms provided by a 20th century software market.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:56:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#39;s hard to like Android.  - jerakeen.org</title><link>http://jerakeen.org/notes/2009/07/hard-to-like-android/#comment-13671187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Same experience. I was given a G1 dev phone (with OS before cupcake). I played with it for 5 days are decided to pass it onto another dev on our team.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm planning on picking up a Palm Pre once I have time for a mobile project.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:25:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rushkoff: "Google's War On The&amp;nbsp;PC"</title><link>http://boingboing.net/2009/07/08/rushkoff-googles-war.html#comment-229053446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"What Jobs didn't happen to notice was that the computer operating system he witnessed and copied wasn't meant as a way to organize the software and data on a single machine--it was actually a way for computers on a network to share resources."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is not historically accurate, but I guess it makes for a good story. Although there were systems early on that focused on networked  machines (see Engelbert's Mother of all Demos) Xerox PARC's computers featured basically the aspects of desktop computing that a Mac Classic featured. Distributed computing was not a focus of early Smalltalk based systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:48:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Search for Beatiful Dynamic Visual Lifestream Pages with Spezify</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/search-for-beatiful-dynamic-visual-lifestream-pages-with-spezify/#comment-11661429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post Mark. The search engine has a good algorithm for how it mixes up results... makes for nice collages like you said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On a more practical note, it would be good if it had a "most recent" view so that you could get timely results on a topic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:01:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: E Miller _ Note : Ubiquity Click</title><link>http://ethanmiller.name/notes/ubiquity_click/#comment-9743279</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ethan, nice Ubiquity command! It's pretty speed zip around links like that. I like that it gives you lots of links by partial matches. I noticed I have to get the Case of the link right so to get to News on your site I can type either 'N' or 'e' but not 'n'. I realize this is a prototype, just giving some input.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clever stuff (as usual!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:46:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lifestream vs. Socialstream: A Battle of Nomenclature</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/lifestream-vs-socialstream-a-battle-of-nomenclature/#comment-9004394</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be fair the term Lifestreaming goes back to the dark ages before the internet... Another term put forward by the DiSo Project is Activity Streams.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think that 'Socialstreams' are a natural evolution for displaying public, useful bits of Lifestreams. We can have amazing communities of practice instead of lonely silos.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:05:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 Reasons Why Firefox Dude May Want to Switch to Chrome</title><link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-reasons-i-switched-to-google-chrome/#comment-44955909</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Confirmed Firefox addict. Other than #1 I don't see anything worth switching for. #5 is slicker than Prism, but I've been using Prism to do the same thing for ages. The FF's awesome bar has changed how I browse/bookmark/search.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think Chrome is an awesome fit for switching out IE users who can't or don't want Firefox (IT policy or something).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:59:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts on Safety and Children in a World of Lifestreaming</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/thoughts-on-safety-and-children-in-a-world-of-lifestreaming/#comment-8211172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have also thought about this issue. As these technologies become mainstream, then it become a viable way to discover new victims. Three features that combat this problem are 1) fuzziness of data in lifestreams, 2) private (or trusted network) Lifestreams, and 3) delayed posting&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Geo-location is being built into the next version of the web so that HTML can prompt you for your lat/long. The good implementations let you edit this location or generalize it before submitting. Example: I am within 2 miles of this street corner...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some lifestreams fuzz your timestamp - Posted around 4 hours ago... or leaving time off all together.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've thought about not posting my L.A. trip content until I return home, which would be useful if it were automated, but isn't practical to do manually (every tweet, flickr, etc that revels your out of town, gets queued up).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In reality, for today, it's probably still cheaper to identify victims the old fashion way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For system designers, it's really hard to know which data or metadata is a risk, beyond the obvious cases. The nice thing about fuzziness is the humans can fill in the dots, but it's harder to data-mine. The downside is (legit) mash-ups and syncing become impossible or more buggy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozten</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:07:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>