<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for othylmann</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/othylmann/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/othylmann/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 06:09:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: „Die logische Weiterentwicklung von VISA“</title><link>http://www.gruenderszene.de/allgemein/thylmann-pro-bitcoin#comment-1035230188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ja, wobei die Frage ja ist ob es auch als Währung funktionieren kann oder sogar schon tut.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 06:09:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: „Die logische Weiterentwicklung von VISA“</title><link>http://www.gruenderszene.de/allgemein/thylmann-pro-bitcoin#comment-1035229971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;aber das ist ja nicht zu widerlegen. Frage ist nur ob es so schlimm ist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 06:09:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: „Die logische Weiterentwicklung von VISA“</title><link>http://www.gruenderszene.de/allgemein/thylmann-pro-bitcoin#comment-1035229037</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Danke für den Tipp. Daran merkt man das ein Artikel erst geschrieben wird und erst später online geht und der Bitcoin Preis noch recht volatil ist ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 06:07:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How much do Apple&amp;#8217;s factories cost?</title><link>http://www.asymco.com/?p=3452#comment-335961163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good points. Looking forward to your continued analysis and will continue reading this religiously ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:44:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How much do Apple&amp;#8217;s factories cost?</title><link>http://www.asymco.com/?p=3452#comment-335947634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well obviously iTunes needs servers, but it might be a bit much. At the same time I am wondering what kind of equipment they would OWN. I mean production is outsourced.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:58:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How much do Apple&amp;#8217;s factories cost?</title><link>http://www.asymco.com/?p=3452#comment-335942649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They must run together. Each sold Siri instance links to more server power beeing needed. Each iCloud User means more storage and syncing abilities. So these two do track.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:37:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How much do Apple&amp;#8217;s factories cost?</title><link>http://www.asymco.com/?p=3452#comment-335936232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't these costs be servers too? They are possibly factored in as costs of iPhones as Siri needs server power. Also they are used to "produce" iCloud. Just a thought. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:08:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOOG Analysis: Partner Sites Show Mysterious Massive Lag In Growth -- Bad News For Publishers - SVW</title><link>http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2011/07/goog_analysis_p.php#comment-330152245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because Google is too big, and publishers would love to replace Google with something else. If they can, they do. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 02:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How 3 Companies Are Using Node.js</title><link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/hack/2011/01/how-3-companies-are-using-node.php#comment-130244507</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We are running our (&lt;a href="http://adcloud.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://adcloud.com"&gt;http://adcloud.com&lt;/a&gt;) with node.js and couchdb&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:01:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here's Why You Need A Liquidation Preference</title><link>http://avc.com/2010/08/heres-why-you-need-a-liquidation-preference/#comment-66807506</link><description>&lt;p&gt;great points already and I am by now more leaning towards an LP but ... there always is a but ;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An LP influences the pre-money valuation. e.g. if somebody said that they would want to invest 1 million at 4 million without LP and somebody else would say that they want an LP, then the valuation would go up to let's say 5 or 6 million. The reason is just the downside protection. You can't have both. (same would be true if you had one bidder that has the choice of an LP, but yeah, it is all hypothetical)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So for me, an LP needs to be simple (I either get my money back or take the part of the sale based on my share but not both) and it needs to allow the founder to keep more shares than she otherwise would. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Than it seems to be fair for both, especially considering that you can't sell without the founders wanting to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:19:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Loic Le Meur Blog: The end of the traditional campaign=reach model</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2010/04/the-end-of-the-traditional-campaignreach-model.html#comment-45818339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can only say by comparing general none targeted campaigns across different properties. And it shows in revs per Mille being a tenth of other sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So to justify paying higher cpms you need branding values because performance wise it is a nogo. Sadly agencies are going more and more performance. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:32:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Loic Le Meur Blog: The end of the traditional campaign=reach model</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2010/04/the-end-of-the-traditional-campaignreach-model.html#comment-45807394</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't overestimate stuff. Nothing really changed. The only thing that changed is that bad things come back to haunt you faster. Other than that, sure, good customer service is important.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I for one think it is outrageous that facebook puts my name next to ads just because I liked something about the company, if even that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And as for other measurements. We have performance advertising. We can measure conversion very well. We can do it post-click and post-view and you know what? Social Networks s**k at converting! You get loads of impressions for next to nothing with tiny CTR and miniscule LR. Unless you are absolutely well targeting in which case you get no impressions, reach or volume. And that is the question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How do you advertise the brands that need to be pushed? This will be interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:48:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Groupon CEO Andrew Mason Talks Growth, Clones, and why Groupon isn&amp;#8217;t a Coupon Site</title><link>http://thenextweb.com/location/2010/03/24/groupon-ceo-andrew-mason-talks-growth-clones-groupon-coupon-site/#comment-41439341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the article. As a hint, &lt;a href="http://dailydeal.de" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="dailydeal.de"&gt;dailydeal.de&lt;/a&gt; in germany has some good investors, &lt;a href="http://citydeal.de" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="citydeal.de"&gt;citydeal.de&lt;/a&gt; has already raised 10 million and is said to raise another 15-20 million in the next few weeks. (&lt;a href="http://www.deutsche-startups.de/2010/03/24/exklusiv-15-millionen-runde-bei-citydeal-wahrscheinlich/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.deutsche-startups.de/2010/03/24/exklusiv-15-millionen-runde-bei-citydeal-wahrscheinlich/)"&gt;http://www.deutsche-startup...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And as to your example of media properties. The Local Newspaper &lt;a href="http://Derwesten.de" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Derwesten.de"&gt;Derwesten.de&lt;/a&gt; has already started or will be starting a clone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:54:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Unique Is A Unique Visitor?</title><link>http://avc.com/2010/02/how-unique-is-a-unique-visitor/#comment-35035647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We are mixing two different things here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One: Knowing what kind of / how many visitors/users/realpeople you have on your site. &lt;br&gt;Two: Publishing somewhere to compare with others.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One in my mind is the important one in the context of the post. &lt;br&gt;Two is totally different and just needs a decision on where the people you need to reach with that statement go looking for their data.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:25:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Unique Is A Unique Visitor?</title><link>http://avc.com/2010/02/how-unique-is-a-unique-visitor/#comment-35008608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote two articles about the subject in 2000, looking at log analyzers and counters back then. I ran a counter, so this might not be unbiased, but the important point is:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both systems have their weaknesses, but the important thing to remember is that you have to understand how each system defines a unique visitor to understand the information each system gives you. (&lt;a href="http://www.clickz.com/827831" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.clickz.com/827831"&gt;http://www.clickz.com/827831&lt;/a&gt; , first one: &lt;a href="http://www.clickz.com/827591)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.clickz.com/827591)"&gt;http://www.clickz.com/827591)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is no correct way to do this. You just need to understand what you are collecting and how it is collected to really get most out of the data.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:19:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Wordpress Be the Natural Successor to Twitter, Friendfeed and Facebook?</title><link>http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/08/11/could-wordpress-be-the-natural-successor-to-twitter-friendfeed-and-facebook/#comment-14648063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I suggest you take a look &lt;a href="http://noserub.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="noserub.com"&gt;noserub.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RingRevenue lands $3.5M from GRP, Rincon, Great Pacific</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/06/05/ringrevenue-lands-35m-from-grp-rincon-great-pacific/#comment-11974339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just one small correction, it is the cheapest form of online advertising, mainly because it only pays what it can afford via sales or leads. It is working because the conversion rates are relatively constant, there are enough placements out there to put them on, and lots of people with placements do not have access to branding campaigns. on very niche sites affiliate ads might outperform google adsense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:32:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s alive!</title><link>https://blog.dropbox.com/2009/06/its-alive/#comment-11524635</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to our growing team I am really looking forward to the P2P Lan syncing. Syncing people over the Internet is starting to be a little bit of a bandwidth hog ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:58:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adsense not working</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/06/12/adsense-not-working/#comment-10835546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;try putting it below the article, a content ad, above the stars. You will be suprised the difference placement makes. But it might move it to a EUR but as this is not a site geared for AdSense you will not be getting $30 of course, but very few people do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:39:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Skype cofounders seeking $266M for their Atomico Ventures fund</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/08/skype-cofounders-seeking-266m-for-their-atomico-ventures-fund/#comment-9156086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They have existed for some time actually, it just seems to be the first time they are taking outside money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 08:29:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Susan Boyle My Heart Will Go On (video)</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/22224/susan-boyle-my-heart-will-go-on-video/#comment-8344931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is that with a previous show they had somebody who was "ugly" but authentic. They fixed that person up and suddenly the authenticity was gone. Some of the people with the show said that this time they will do their best to not screw it up ;) meaning leave it like it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:39:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If You've Got Suggestions For Boxee ....</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/12/if-youve-got-su/#comment-4517972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually had the account before your investment but hey, feedback none the less. posted on getsatisfaction. thank you for supporting boxee&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Google be the N.Y. Times salvation?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/11859/could-google-be-the-ny-times-salvation/#comment-4385103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With the costs that the NYT has for authors, Google will very likely not buy the company. and cultural and culinary coverage just doesn't convert performance advertising wise. So I'd lean out of the window and say "nope, not going to happen."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:14:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: jamiew's tumblr</title><link>http://jamiew.tumblr.com/post/57329150#comment-3429230</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you porposed? :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:30:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxee: Brilliant UI, shame about the business plan</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2613/boxee-brilliant-ui-shame-about-the-business-plan/#comment-1822641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;damn, mythtv is supported to some extent: &lt;a href="http://forum.boxee.tv/showthread.php?t=286" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://forum.boxee.tv/showthread.php?t=286"&gt;http://forum.boxee.tv/showt...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:34:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>