<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for opit</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/opit/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/opit/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 21:16:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 25th anniversary Hayabusa</title><link>https://www.revzilla.com/common-tread/25th-anniversary-hayabusa#comment-6237001894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hm. My 2nd wife insisted on buying an Austin Marina like her mother drove. The vendor's repainting was done in Puke ( Whoops. Misspelled Puce )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 21:16:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No More Mister Nice Blog: THE FEW REMAINING DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN THE TRUMP GOP AND THE "ESTABLISHMENT" GOP COULD BE ERASED BY RON DeSANTIS</title><link>https://nomoremister.blogspot.com/2022/10/the-few-remaining-distinctions-between.html#comment-6019198590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not too smart. Unlike some, the wisdom of reprogramming an immune system by people claiming competence reminds me far too much of idiots who cannot fix cars or computers. Why anyone would solicit such for a group which falls outside primary threat parameters is not obvious. Whatever happened to caution indicated by "Do No Harm" ? It isn't as if they can be trusted to reinstate conditions before meddling was instituted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2022 04:49:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another day, another blow to transportation freedom</title><link>https://www.cfact.org/2022/08/14/another-day-another-blow-to-transportation-freedom/#comment-5949596830</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When dogma is your assessment of alternative opinion, any claim of open-mindedness goes down the shitter. Pot calling the kettle black.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Audible is discontinuing their Windows Desktop App</title><link>https://goodereader.com/blog/audiobooks/audible-is-discontinuing-their-windows-desktop-app#comment-5868787385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why would I use a streaming app to play downloaded material ? The guy who quit Audible in disgust mirrors my reaction. And yes, I can multitask in print while listening to a story. My connection to the net is unreliable. The cloud can be unavailable without warning for hours at a time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 10:19:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5856837513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have a look at the list of U.S. military interventions. Regardless of anything else, such is nothing other than terrorism in uniform. IOW this situation is not a matter of local responsibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2022 06:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5797412651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I could care less what country you are in"   That has not stopped your recommendation. BTW Foreign firms disposing of garbage have wrecked Somali fishing grounds. Piracy was a consequence of no government to stop fraud.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 02:13:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5790103371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I never believe people's claims"     :) If that were correct we would have nothing to discuss. The purpose of energy tax being used to restrict access is a fine case of forcing people to finance activity plainly against their own interests. Thinking projections of future conditions are a reasonable excuse is to completely ignore that we cannot do that reliably much more than a week ahead; let alone accept a premise that it can be done decades ahead - with no chance of verification to buttress such a fantastical idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 01:44:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iowa Senate approves on-farm sales and distribution of unpasteurized, raw milk</title><link>https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2022/03/iowa-senate-approves-on-farm-sales-and-distribution-of-unpasteurized-raw-milk/#comment-5787872974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reading through this article, one would think it an absolute miracle people did not suffer a plethora of diseases from  raw milk before pasteurization was instituted. I happened to read blogs of people who disagreed the practice conferred a benefit. In fact, it is thought killing bacteria cannot happen without reducing nutrition and destroying long chain molecules. This belief is closely held because of paying attention to the resulting general health of children rather than speculating on 'what ifs'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2022 01:43:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5783223654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What part of I am not a citizen of the US is too abstruse for your understanding ? Figuring out how the Russkis are being screwed is not worshiping Putin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 23:51:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5781409602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"really want the USA to fall apart like the USSR did" Biden is doing a fine job of that. No country purporting to control banking should also repeatedly demonstrate a willingness to rob depositors ( sanctions ). &lt;br&gt;BTW I'm in Texas North.....Alberta (Canuckistan). Mind, our fondness for the US is often not enhanced by proximity. Calling somebody an anarchist in cowboy country is likely a compliment. As for 'carbon emissions' ..... find a study which can demonstrate effects of mankind's practices in some kind of systematic linkage of cause and effect. Hint : that's tough to do without an essential of science ..... data. Things which have not happened cause no data trail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 13:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain glaciers may hold less ice than previously thought – here’s what that means for 2 billion downstream water users and sea level rise</title><link>https://themoderatevoice.com/mountain-glaciers-may-hold-less-ice-than-previously-thought-heres-what-that-means-for-2-billion-downstream-water-users-and-sea-level-rise/#comment-5781396625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This particular 'data' is not what I was referring to. The premise is recycled. Get a load of paragraph 5. &lt;a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/08/glaciers-mountains" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/08/glaciers-mountains"&gt;https://www.theguardian.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 13:34:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain glaciers may hold less ice than previously thought – here’s what that means for 2 billion downstream water users and sea level rise</title><link>https://themoderatevoice.com/mountain-glaciers-may-hold-less-ice-than-previously-thought-heres-what-that-means-for-2-billion-downstream-water-users-and-sea-level-rise/#comment-5728494018</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This nonsense was current over 10 years ago. The government of India, in turn, instituted independent research which concluded determining factors for glacial growth were direction of winds aloft and their moisture content. They figured they needed realistic appraisal based on science rather than fantasies of the absurd.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 23:50:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5661040165</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'Anarchist' ? I think I'm flattered. Sounds lots better than Royalist or usual 'conservative' accusation. Binky. 'Scientists' don't 'herd'.  It's a mindset of questioning assumptions ( You remember. Assume makes an ass out of you and me. ) - not of  being dictated to like priests.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 16:21:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5609106507</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think you should  'believe authority'. That's the point ! Rather you should appreciate disagreement when discussing unknown situations. It is the only way to generate variation of forecasts. Weather reports are only decent for a week.  Climate ? We have no verifiable idea. In such a situation 'authority' is a fantasy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:39:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5571791487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It looks like you have problems with basic reading comprehension. Otherwise you would not contend that only scientists (sic) are authorities and may make valid arguments. The basis of science is argument and contention.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 04:57:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5562011698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"He's not a scientists, and he has no idea what he 's talking about and when he does, he lying."   Obviously, there is nobody here you consider worth listening to. Such a statement is a total contradiction to the basics of constructive discussion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 23:24:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Have Not Known a World Without the War in Afghanistan. Here is My Perspective.</title><link>https://themoderatevoice.com/i-have-not-known-a-world-without-the-war-in-afghanistan-here-is-my-perspective/#comment-5534445442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The thing about Afghanistan ( you have to love that 'stan' suffix for a Pashtun nation ) is not that 20 years of fighting accomplished nothing. Murder in a desert far from home is wonderful for eating up arms sales. 'Defence' ? Only for the geographically challenged. The historically challenged too. Maybe Biden didn't do too badly. &lt;a href="https://www.thoughtco.com/britains-disastrous-retreat-from-kabul-1773762" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.thoughtco.com/britains-disastrous-retreat-from-kabul-1773762"&gt;https://www.thoughtco.com/b...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:03:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How your dog can help stop climate change</title><link>https://betakit.com/how-your-dog-can-help-stop-climate-change/#comment-5531576368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;" worked for a few failed companies"  Your 'vegan analysis' would fit right in. Not that 'industrial farming' is defensible. Poisoning the land to produce food is idiocy. Ditto overwhelming water supply by use of phosphate-rich fertilizer. Abandoning traditional methods for corporate supremacy repeats a cycle which literally destroyed farming in central and south America in the 1940's. No - I'm a bit more basic and seemingly 'out of it'. I do not buy into the narrative that mankind is twisting the control knob of climate. Saving the future is not a verifiable goal. Things which have not happened have no - as in zero - confirming data.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2021 03:02:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5482946914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remain disagreeing that speculation is soundly established cause for alarm. What I am getting from you I class as disdainful hype. Such is the recourse of one who wishes to 'win' and 'get the last word' rather than engage in discussion. Your sole excuse is hysteria.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:33:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5449352064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remain intentionally disagreeing with representations that air circulation, storms, clouds, rain and more are reasonably accounted for in calculations of static conditions enforced by air in a world with a diurnal cycle, seasons, and variations in barometric pressure and temperature with changes in elevation, plus known clusters of wind pillars. Spotty measurements of readings on land on a water covered planet should be enough to make one cynical about the value of averaging variation as a method of analyzing cyclical change ( oops. Cycles are ignored too ! )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 06:07:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5439746119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It didn't take much reading to find the fly in the ointment. We are not talking about something understood in its various permutations when the summary says &lt;br&gt;(12)  There is an urgent need to acquire further data for climate&lt;br&gt;model validation on both global and regional scales, and to&lt;br&gt;perform validation against data sets produced in the course of&lt;br&gt;operational weather forecasting. &lt;br&gt;  IOW Forecasts and models are not the same as data measurement - which should be basic and obvious.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 02:05:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On climate change: we don&amp;#039;t need a new report to know it&amp;#039;s time to act</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/560444-on-climate-change-we-dont-need-a-new-report-to-know-its-time-to#comment-5438368872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;O.K. Would you care to share some of that evidence ? I have a problem with people who cite changes yet to occur as evidence. To say the data is underwhelming is to understate the problem. That's what evidence is BTW.  Data and instrumental readings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:38:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BOMBSHELL: Connecticut govt. secretly tells health care workers covid vaccines are DEADLY, but withholds the same information from the public</title><link>https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-05-18-connecticut-govt-secretly-tells-health-care-workers-covid-vaccines-are-deadly.html#comment-5410963688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"the common sense He bequeathed "  Not only does that sound like an oxymoron to the common, the Father is the putative source if you insist on a religious framework. Good and Evil are judgement calls. You know, like "Judge not lest you be judged." Even so, the Caution flag is up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 01:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BOMBSHELL: Connecticut govt. secretly tells health care workers covid vaccines are DEADLY, but withholds the same information from the public</title><link>https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-05-18-connecticut-govt-secretly-tells-health-care-workers-covid-vaccines-are-deadly.html#comment-5410959799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;" wonder if they've actually been hypnotised"&lt;br&gt;It's called "TV programming". You can't get more straightforward than that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 01:09:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nolte: Joe Biden&amp;#8217;s Shift on Masks Is Based on Failure and Panic</title><link>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/05/14/joe-bidens-shift-masks-based-failure-panic/#comment-5399625566</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Huh. If you understand the mechanisms of viral evolution, the stimulus of vaccination should be their first concern. Reprogramming a successful human evolutionary system should not be the province of arrogant blowhards who neither understand their subject nor can reverse their intervention when it blows up in their face.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 01:06:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>