<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ollysk2</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ollysk2/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ollysk2/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:33:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: iPhone&amp;#8217;s single-task operating system renders it a poor man&amp;#8217;s Nokia</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/12/iphones_single-task_operating_system_renders_it_a_poor_mans_nokia.html#comment-26913303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;James,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll never be completely satisfied with ANY handset -- Stefan's series of posts on the 'mythical perfect smartphone' on Intomobile are right on the money: it doesn't exist.  However, at this point in time, I am very happy using my iPhone, and the most compelling reason for me to switch (or to stay) would be to be able to run things like Pandora in the background, and to not have to exit Stanza while I'm reading just to answer a text message.  It's become the one big annoyance, above any other annoyance, that I am tired of dealing with.  If that were fixed, then realistically I see no reason to switch platforms (right now, of course).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I spent years buying every S60 phone that came out (I think that I've owned probably 80% of the S60 phones released since the 3650, up until my last one the N85)... I likewise went through a bunch of blackberries, a couple of Windows Mobile phones, some SE garbage -- and in the end, I've been most happy with the iPhone.  But with streaming media services becoming something I use more and more in the last couple of years, not being able to background Pandora/&lt;a href="http://Last.fm/spotify/etc" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Last.fm/spotify/etc"&gt;Last.fm/spotify/etc&lt;/a&gt; has become a deal-breaker for me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So if the iPhone adds that, I'll be happy -- if not, I'm off to Android. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:33:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone&amp;#8217;s single-task operating system renders it a poor man&amp;#8217;s Nokia</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/12/iphones_single-task_operating_system_renders_it_a_poor_mans_nokia.html#comment-26899583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple has one more revision, the one that is supposedly coming this summer, to add multi-tasking -- at which point, if they don't, I'll be gone to Android faster than you can say "there's an app for that".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:47:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia Booklet 3G Review: Things I Love</title><link>http://rickycadden.com/2009/12/nokia-booklet-3g-review-things-i-love/#comment-26233005</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I still font understand shy netbook makers are so stuck on this whole  &lt;br&gt;"1gb" thing. Ya ya I know the story with Microsoft, but quite honestly  &lt;br&gt;they should have chalenged that more. The Atom processor is a decent  &lt;br&gt;proc for what most people would use a netbook for, but with 1gb it's  &lt;br&gt;just hamstrung. When I went from 1gb to 2gb in my mini9 the difference  &lt;br&gt;was amazing, especially with Windows.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--&lt;br&gt;Sent from my mobile.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:38:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia Booklet 3G Review: Things I Love</title><link>http://rickycadden.com/2009/12/nokia-booklet-3g-review-things-i-love/#comment-26192001</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know what's funny?  With the exception of the 3G, everything you just named about the booklet are what I love about my Macbook Pro... and that's a GOOD thing!  The 3.5mm audio in/out port, the strong casing, chiclet keyboard, etc.  I STILL am skeptical about the unsubsidized price of this thing, but sounds like it's a decent machine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:34:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Nokia Booklet 3G Has 1GB Of RAM</title><link>http://rickycadden.com/2009/12/why-the-nokia-booklet-3g-has-1gb-of-ram/#comment-25014675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From what I understand, M$ doesn't place the same limitation on it's Windows 7 netbooks that it does on it's XP netbooks -- so hopefully you'll be able to start seeing Win7 netbooks with 2gb ram soon enough.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:16:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone to hit T-Mobile USA next?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/30/iphone-to-hit-t-mobile-usa-next/#comment-24368910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"company won’t have to make a special iPhone for it (like it would have to do for Verizon’s CDMA/EV-DO network)."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You do realize that T-Mobile has unique 3G bands (1700/2100) that aren't used elsewhere, so there would STILL need to be a unique iPhone for them -- granted, not as much of a change as going CDMA/EV-DO, but still would need to be a new chipset that supported T-Mobile's AWS 3G bands.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:13:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s the best backpack a geek can buy?</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/10/whats_the_best_backpack_a_geek_can_buy.html#comment-21158332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'l second the Northface recommendation - as a daily driver, I carry a Crumpler messenger bag, but my travel backpack is a Northface something or other that I bought a few years ago, and it's been through a ton of shit and still keeps going.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mobile Industry Review turns into a weekly newsletter next Friday</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/10/mobile_industry_review_turns_into_a_weekly_newsletter_next_friday.html#comment-20882465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the idea, but I gotta suggest Sunday, not Friday -- the main reason being that all week my RSS and email goes apeshit - then on Sunday there's a huge dead lag -- so having this to read on Sunday would mean I had a lot more time to devote to it, AND give me something to read on a slow news day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:36:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia Booklet 3G To Cost $299 From Best Buy</title><link>http://rickycadden.com/2009/10/nokia-booklet-3g-to-cost-299-from-best-buy/#comment-20073970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just to be clear, I said a third LESS, not a third of the price ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are right about the 720p, I'll give you that - but only for now given that Dell, Lenovo, Asus, etc all have 720p displays announced, and all of them for cheaper (ranging from 75 bucks to 200 bucks cheaper).  HDMI-out is available on quite a few netbooks at the moment - again all cheaper.  As for battery life, most of the newer netbook batteries are announcing 7hr and up battery life, and I'd say that once you get to the 7 or 8 hr mark, you're playing in the same ball field.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So yes, the Nokia adds GPS to the mix, and if GPS on your netbook is worth the premium, then sure, it's a good deal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But you'll still never convince me that having a built in sim is a good idea over an external modem, given the flexibility argument.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:40:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia Booklet 3G To Cost $299 From Best Buy</title><link>http://rickycadden.com/2009/10/nokia-booklet-3g-to-cost-299-from-best-buy/#comment-20017405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ya but the fact that without the subsidy it's 600 also is a turn off..  &lt;br&gt;There are similar spec'd netbooks for a third less, and there really  &lt;br&gt;isn't anything super compelling about the booklet to warrant the  &lt;br&gt;premium.. Once again you are paying the Nokia tax for no reason.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the sim card being user accessible, fair point but you can get  &lt;br&gt;a subsidized netbook with internal 3g and similar specs for anywhere  &lt;br&gt;from free to 200 bucks, so you STILL pay an unwarranted premium for  &lt;br&gt;the booklet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not to mention the fact that an external modem allows use across  &lt;br&gt;multiple devices a) without swapping the sim, and b) even on devices  &lt;br&gt;that don't have an internal sim slot. The netbook by it's definition  &lt;br&gt;is supposed to be a companion device, not a primary device, so in  &lt;br&gt;theory you'd have another laptop that most likely DOESNT have a sim  &lt;br&gt;slot. So ya, you can yank the sim out but if you want to use it on any  &lt;br&gt;other device, you'd need to buy an external modem anyway, which  &lt;br&gt;unsubsidized would be another couple hundred bucks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The point is that by buying an internal 3g device you cripple the  &lt;br&gt;flexibility of that 60 bucks a month you are paying for, and by buying  &lt;br&gt;the nokia unsubsidized you are paying more without any real  &lt;br&gt;justification for paying it. Hell even the Apple tax gets you OSX  &lt;br&gt;which at least is somewhat of a differentiator.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In my opinion ISP's would be smart to offer a discount on internal 3g  &lt;br&gt;per month, say 40 vs 60, to compensate for the lack of flexibility.  &lt;br&gt;And as for Nokia, they need to seriously examine thier pricing  &lt;br&gt;structure -- but that's nothing new.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Matt&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--&lt;br&gt;Sent from my mobile.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:25:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia Booklet 3G To Cost $299 From Best Buy</title><link>http://rickycadden.com/2009/10/nokia-booklet-3g-to-cost-299-from-best-buy/#comment-19975421</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I still don't see a point in this.   Sure, $299.00 is priced the same as most other netbooks -- except for the fact that it is AFTER subsidy.  So we're talking a 1700.00 commitment over 2 years?  No thanks.  You'd be WAAAAAY better off getting a netbook for the same price that wasn't on a subsidy, and then getting a data plan.  Sure, you are committed to the data plan, but at least then in a year when the next big thing comes out, you can simply move your usb modem over to a new gadget.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:49:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Steve Jobs hates the iPhone App Store</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/08/why_steve_jobs_hates_the_iphone_app_store.html#comment-13869320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, bring on the Android for sure.. I think that before worrying  &lt;br&gt;about web apps they need to start worrying about opening up thier  &lt;br&gt;attitude and platform a bit. Android's major strength is not just it's  &lt;br&gt;multitasking, etc over the iPhone, but the fact that a dev can write  &lt;br&gt;for it without worrying about the crapshoot that is the App Store (as  &lt;br&gt;the recent Google Voice fiasco demonstrates).  Android has more  &lt;br&gt;options for devices, a more open environment, and if the gathering  &lt;br&gt;steam continues, almost as much industry support. Really, Apple is  &lt;br&gt;left with a much prettier UI, and a world class marketing department.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don't get me wrong, I love what my iPhone can do, but I'm getting more  &lt;br&gt;and more interested in Android as certain gaps are filled -- if Apple  &lt;br&gt;doesn't step up the innovation, I'll be on an Android handset this  &lt;br&gt;time next year, I can almost guarantee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--&lt;br&gt;Sent from my mobile.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 02:29:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Steve Jobs hates the iPhone App Store</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/08/why_steve_jobs_hates_the_iphone_app_store.html#comment-13810992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All I have to say is that if Apple really feels this way, then put up or shut up; if they feel the browser is where it's at then freaking hell just implement already! They just had one of their milestone moments with the release of 3.0 -- so why not wow the world with your amazing new browser tech? Google will get gears for mobile perfected soon, and Apple needs to be right there competing, or Android will simply keep moving further ahead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My .02 cents (written on my iPhone)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 11:50:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mobile Industry Review goes subscription-only from 30th March</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/mobile_industry_review_goes_subscription-only_from_30th_march.html#comment-7136734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So Long, and Thanks For All the Fish...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trying to destroy the Sonim XP3 handset</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/mir_show_-_dan_a_hammer_and_the_sonim_xp3_.html#comment-6497964</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dan, why do I get the feeling from these videos that this was the absolute high light for you at MWC?  You look like a kid in a candy store (or more appropriately a kid at a construction site that has been given a sledge and pointed at a wall needing demolishing). &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:26:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What do you think of the new spinvox.com?</title><link>http://paulfwalsh.com/what-do-you-think-of-this-site/#comment-6305303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The biggest issue I have is that it's 'form' over 'function'.  It's a very cool design, but is resource intensive to the point of me saying 'pass'.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:40:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flirtomatic users send each other REAL underwear and roses!</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/flirtomatic_users_send_each_other_real_underwear_and_roses_.html#comment-6206723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Although it's not really my thing, this kind of innovation in the mobile world never fails to impress!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:01:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The MIR jackets have arrived!</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/the_mir_jackets_have_arrived_.html#comment-6206120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like you ought to open a gear store Ewan, I'm not the only one apparently that wants to get some schwag!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:32:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The MIR jackets have arrived!</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/the_mir_jackets_have_arrived_.html#comment-6205699</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ewan -- how would I go about getting  myself a MIR sticker for my laptop?  (Those look like MIR stickers in the package, that's why I'm asking).  Hope you guys have fun at MWC!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:07:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where are the updates to the S60 Browser?</title><link>http://www.atmasphere.net/archives/2009/02/06/wheres-are-the-updates-to-the-s60-browser#comment-6045580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Man, add this to the list... S60 has added some cool features to it, and it's still a good OS -- but the core components are getting OLD to the point of being ANCIENT in gadget world terms.  Things that need to be sorely updated:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;*Browser&lt;br&gt;*Email Client&lt;br&gt;*PIM&lt;br&gt;*WiFi Connection Client&lt;br&gt;*SMS (I'm fine with it, but enough people are asking for threaded that it's worth noting here).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nokia really needs to focus on getting the core OS upgraded.  The email experience on the iPhone is so much nicer than on S60 it makes me cry -- native HTML (not an attachment), better Exchange integration (sub-folder), etc -- I hate to compare everything to the iPhone, but in this situation it's necessary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not to JUST throw S60 under the bus though, it's true of a lot of the 'legacy' smartphone OS's.  Blackberry desperately needs a complete overhaul of their UI, not to mention that even with the Bold changes their browser still sucks.  Windows Mobile just plain blows -- and it's going to take a lot to convince me otherwise -- it's buggy, slow, the browser is HORRIBLE.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The iPhone is not truly a smartphone, I still argue that, yet it does some 'smartphoney' things better than the actual smartphones out there.  Between the slick email, browser, and UI of the iPhone, and things brought to the table by Android and the new Palm Pre OS-- Blackberry, Symbian, and WinMo need to take a look at getting things updated QUICKLY to stay competitive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-ollysk2&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:21:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Normob is &amp;#8216;ugly word&amp;#8217;, use &amp;#8216;people&amp;#8217; instead</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/normob_is_ugly_word_use_people_instead.html#comment-5871237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Man, such a fuss over a word that's not that bad (I happen to like it) -- at least it's not "mobtard" or something like that.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:26:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to identify the MIR team at Mobile World Congress</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/how_to_identify_the_mir_team_at_mobile_world_congress.html#comment-5457511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I seriously want to buy one of these -- everyone in my life already thinks I'm insane when it comes to mobile phones -- wearing a jacket that advertised a blog about them would just confirm my geekery.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:38:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plumbers, douchebags and bluetooth headsets</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/plumbers_douchebags_and_bluetooth_headsets.html#comment-5163310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As the original Tweeter of said comment, let me defend my statement: unless you are actively recieving instructions from someone that require the simultaneous use of your hands, you fall into the above category.. So if you are a surgeon doing an emergency brain surgery, and have the premier neurosurgeon from Johns Hopkins on the other line, you are excused. If you are an asshole in line at Starbucks, you are not!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:02:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MIR Show Week 42 featuring the iMovio iKit</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/10/mir_show_week_42_featuring_the_imovio_ikit.html#comment-3234150</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very good show guys -- judging from the comments, the iMovio caught the most attention (and it is a fascinating device, especially for the market it's aimed at), but am I the only one that was riveted by the power segment?  I LOVED all the solar powered schwag, I can see the big one (Sun Gorilla?) being in the back window of my vehicle charging any number of things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great stuff!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:21:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Source Food</title><link>http://worthyy.com/index.php/open-source-food#comment-2985201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very cool -- my wife will be all over this in a heartbeat!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:59:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>