<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for nittanywhiteout</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/nittanywhiteout/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/nittanywhiteout/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:15:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 2011 Penn State football poster misprinted and now available</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/07/11/2011-penn-state-football-poster-misprinted-and-now-available/#comment-248274285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome! I'm a big fan, nicely done. I would love to have a poster of that. Glad you also got rid of team schedule on the bottom as well&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:15:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Longhorn Network to test Big 12 fans&amp;#8217; patience</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/07/07/longhorn-network-will-soon-test-big-12-fans-patience/#comment-245597562</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gah! thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 22:13:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Longhorn Network to test Big 12 fans&amp;#8217; patience</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/07/07/longhorn-network-will-soon-test-big-12-fans-patience/#comment-245557477</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hahaha, touche. Though I still think it could be a marquee game, Baylor won in Austin last year, Robert Griffin returns to QB the Bears and the game is already slotted for ABC. Now how many fans in Waco will actually care enough to demand the Longhorn Network be available to catch the game is questionable. Seeing as they are only 105 miles away from Austin, you would think Waco would be considered a lock to be part of the immediate Longhorn Network footprint.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:03:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tim Curley: &amp;#8216;No interest&amp;#8217; in extending Pitt series</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/06/17/tim-curley-no-interest-in-extending-pitt-series/#comment-228382596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a fan, I'd love to see Penn State take on Oklahoma, Texas, USC and Oregon on an annual basis, but I know that's just not going to happen with so many old regional rivals located conveniently by us. But I don't disagree with your sentiment, is our OOC scheduling creative? Definitely not, we are basically recycling our old independent rivals during OOC play, but they DO rotate. If we tack on Pitt, we are essentially playing Pitt and Temple on an annual basis in addition to our Big Ten schedule. The only variety we would be left with would be the last 2 remaining OOC spots which would probably be left to the likes of MAC programs. That number diminishes to just 1 remaining spot when the Big Ten moves to a 9 game conference schedule. So as much as we as fans would love an extended rivalry, it really isn't in Penn State's best interest even if it is possible logistically.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:54:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pryor&amp;#8217;s sheer contempt for OSU mess is comical</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/05/31/pryors-sheer-contempt-for-osu-mess-is-comical/#comment-214955776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;US News has original MSRP listed at  $36,870 - $42,570&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/Nissan_350Z/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/Nissan_350Z/"&gt;http://usnews.rankingsandre...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Car and Driver lists the 2009 model at  $37,590 - $43,290&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://buyersguide.caranddriver.com/nissan/z/2009/nissan-350z" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://buyersguide.caranddriver.com/nissan/z/2009/nissan-350z"&gt;http://buyersguide.caranddr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not sure where you're getting $13,000 to $15,000 at, but if you can buy one at that price, send em my way please&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 15:10:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Knights of the Round Table have nothing on the Bloggers of the Blue/White Roundtable</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/04/22/bluewhite-roundtable-bluewhite-game-edition/knight/#comment-205393543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This image has been circulating for quite some time now, but as far as I can gather we obtained the image from another blog Concurring Opinions. But I don't believe they are the owners of the image either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/law_talk_a_roundtable_on_justice_and_insturmentalism_in_private_law.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/law_talk_a_roundtable_on_justice_and_insturmentalism_in_private_law.html"&gt;http://www.concurringopinio...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 16:07:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Justice Department&amp;#8217;s BCS inquiry nothing more than a farce</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/05/05/plenty-of-time-to-waste-justice-department-has-questions-about-the-bcs/#comment-199932533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These aren't frivolous threats, the powers-that-be have consistently made their position clear that should the BCS be scrapped, they would rather return to the old bowl system than proceed with a possible playoff. In fact, Jim Delany said exactly that in his response to the Justice Department's letter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"There's no judge or jury in the world, that can make you enter into an four-team, eight-team or 16-team playoff. I know at the end of the day that we've operated in total good faith. I know that (the postseason) is better than it was... And if it can't go forward, it can't go forward. But I also know that we can't be enjoined, we can't be directed or forced into something we don't think is the right thing for us to do."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/campusrivalry/post/2011/05/big-ten-boss-jim-delany-says-bcs-can-stand-up-to-federal-scrutiny/1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/campusrivalry/post/2011/05/big-ten-boss-jim-delany-says-bcs-can-stand-up-to-federal-scrutiny/1"&gt;http://content.usatoday.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Notre Dame AD Jack Swarbrick's DoJ letter response wasn't that much different.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"If, for some reason, the current model was viewed as unacceptable in antitrust terms, I think there are a number of alternatives available to address it that wouldn't necessarily involve a playoff... Such as something closer to the previous (bowl) system."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/2011-05-05-ncaa-justice-department_N.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/2011-05-05-ncaa-justice-department_N.htm"&gt;http://www.usatoday.com/spo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 21:00:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Justice Department&amp;#8217;s BCS inquiry nothing more than a farce</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/05/05/plenty-of-time-to-waste-justice-department-has-questions-about-the-bcs/#comment-197857656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm cannot deny that the logical postseason format would be a playoff. But since the creation and defense of the BCS, when has logic ruled among the powers-that-be concerning a college football postseason? People mistakenly assume that somehow as fans we are entitled to a playoff. That isn't the true. The 56 years prior to the BCS is proof of that. We forget that the BCS was actually a compromise between the Bowl Alliance and the Big Ten/Pac 10/Rose Bowl to attempt to provide an annual 1 vs 2 game, that rarely occurred due to each conference's bowl tie ins. It was never a step towards giving fans an eventual playoff system. The bowl system, even the minor ones, and their existence are the key here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even if the DoJ is successful, they can only force the conferences to abandon the current BCS system. They have no power in deciding how the NCAA should proceed after that, and the conference commissioners have said clearly that they would return to the old bowl tie-ins than proceed with a playoff. Backwards or not, that is the clear position of the people who decide college football's postseason format regardless of fan opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The BCS might be antiquated, it might be a flawed way to select a postseason champion and it is definitely unpopular with the most vocal portion of the fan base, but it doesn't violate anti trust laws. And the DoJ is just using a popular issue to pander to the people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 14:39:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Source claims Jim Tressel had prior knowledge of Tattoo-Gate</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/03/08/source-claims-jim-tressel-had-prior-knowledge-of-tattoo-gate/#comment-162714808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, at last count. Yahoo! Sports investigative team is now 2 for 3 with the Oregon accusations pending. I'd say that's a pretty legitimate track record. USC and Ohio State accusations proved to be stunningly accurate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:29:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PSU Lands Deion Barnes</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/01/20/psu-lands-deion-barnes/#comment-131893232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I am not going to be one of those guys that just stays three years, I want to be there for four. For those reasons, I am going to Penn State." Gotta love that quote from a highly sought after student athlete.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:55:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amid ratings decline, Penn State still top 2010-11 bowl ratings</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/01/13/amid-ratings-decline-penn-state-still-top-2010-11-bowl-ratings/#comment-128863517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh I'm sure the ratings were influenced by Meyers impending retirement, but how do you explain Penn State also topping last year's bowl ratings when they played in the Capital One Bowl, or in the years prior to that. Or that bobby bowdens final bowl game failed to make a ratings blip last year when slotted against Penn State in the Capital One Bowl? Penn State is perenially one of the top television draws regardless of bowl or opponent and this years numbers further reflects that. There's a reason why bowls would not hesitate to jump on an available Penn State team when it comes to bowl selection time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:21:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oversigning Sucks, or: Why the Big Ten Can Still Claim Moral Superiority</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/01/10/oversigning-sucks-or-why-the-big-ten-can-still-claim-moral-superiority/#comment-126957320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's just surprising how the NCAA has not stepped in to do away with what is essentially a loopholes that some programs have been abusing. It simply amounts to an egregious breach of trust between a school/coach and 18-24 year old student athletes. Even in my interview early this past season with one of the contributors at Roll 'Bama Roll, I was taken back by how unapologetically vocal he was about Alabama/Nick Saban's practice of oversigning. A sentiment I'm sure is shared by many in the SEC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/09/10/gameweek-pulse-alabama-crimson-tide-ii/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/09/10/gameweek-pulse-alabama-crimson-tide-ii/"&gt;http://nittanywhiteout.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:17:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thanks, Joe: Rob Bolden to Transfer</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2011/01/02/thanks-joe-rob-bolden-to-transfer/#comment-123337847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Though I can't fault Bolden for choosing what he thought was best for himself and his pro aspirations, I am a little stunned he did not decide to compete for the starting spot this offseason. He's got a great shot at taking over the starting role next season following the Outback Bowl disaster and Joe publicly second guessing himself for not replacing McGloin and has plenty of experience under his belt to expand the playbook. Highly disappointing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 19:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nitt Links can tolerate the logo change</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/12/14/nitt-links-can-tolerate-the-logo-change/#comment-112678734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're absolutely right, there are plenty of other options, but when the Big Ten originally came up with their current logo, the graphic designer also created alternate ones with the numbers in the negative space all the way up to 16. It's not hard to assume that was the track the Big Ten was on and it was only doomed to the same failure that the Pac 10/12 logo will soon in a couple months and whenever the next league shift occurs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But instead we got a brand new design and if this is considered the worst that we will see from the Big Ten, I can definitely live with it. Though I agree there are plenty of other options out there. Check this one out &lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_O4VD4r77TRk/TQksLg0vxUI/AAAAAAAAAJg/TBdojTSC6U0/s1600/anthonytscherne.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_O4VD4r77TRk/TQksLg0vxUI/AAAAAAAAAJg/TBdojTSC6U0/s1600/anthonytscherne.jpg"&gt;http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_O...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:38:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MD hate week bordering on offensive - The Daily Collegian Online</title><link>http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2010/12/01/md_hate_week_bordering_on_offensive.aspx#comment-105689067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't think of a more frivolous reason to be upset than maybe that "White Out T shirt looks like a cross" fiasco. Was the joke in bad taste? Yes. But was it prefaced with the joke #MDHateWeek tag? Yes. To blow this out of proportion is a reach and although I personally wouldn't have said it, I am by no means outraged and shamed by it like the Michigan couple incident.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:57:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Championship Week Blogpolling</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/11/30/championship-week-blogpolling-2/#comment-105184813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What an utter shame that the champion of the Big East will be awarded an automatic BCS spot when 11-1 Michigan State will be locked out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:25:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make it 5: Anthony Alosi commits to Penn State</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/11/15/make-it-5-anthony-alosi-commits-to-penn-state/#comment-97588191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha, nice! good catch. Correction has been made.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:55:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Case for Matt McGloin</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/11/09/the-case-for-matt-mcgloin/#comment-95631350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt McGloin is named the starting quarterback against Ohio State this weekend.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ap-positivepennstate" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ap-positivepennstate"&gt;http://rivals.yahoo.com/nca...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Go get em McGloin!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:08:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Penn State Pregaming: Joe Goes for #400</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/11/05/penn-state-pregaming-joe-goes-for-400/#comment-94267266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Way to go Joe!! It doesn't matter where I travel, whenever Penn State is brought up, everyone immediately references Joe Paterno and their admiration for him. All those years, all those wins and never a sniff of NCAA violations. Joe Pa is the reason I am proud to call myself a Penn Stater.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:21:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Sky is Not Falling</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/10/03/the-sky-is-not-falling/#comment-84177156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well put Devon. The anti-Joe rhetoric following this loss is ridiculous. Somehow losing to a favored Iowa team on the road suddenly means Joe no longer knows how to coach against and upset higher ranked teams? That we are doomed to mediocrity? Didn't we just upset a higher ranked LSU on New Year's Day? How about that win which temporarily ended our futility at the Horseshoe in 2008. Sure a loss is always tough to swallow, but let's keep things in perspective here. Just take a look at Georgia for an example of how a rebuilding year can really go wrong, take a deep breath and remember that we are still Penn State.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:41:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Far Big Ten Offenses Have to Go to Score</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/09/22/how-far-big-ten-offenses-have-to-go-to-score/#comment-80481119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All scoring drives that result in a touchdown or field goals.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:25:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toughest Venues: #4 Michigan Stadium</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2008/05/23/toughest-venues-4-michigan-stadium/#comment-80480870</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. Just wow. Don't forget to put away those keys after you're done jiggling it, you wouldn't want to lose them to your insubordinate rivals.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:22:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Far Big Ten Offenses Have to Go to Score</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/09/22/how-far-big-ten-offenses-have-to-go-to-score/#comment-80133739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those are omitted altogether. Interceptions and fumbles returned by the defense for touchdowns don't factor into the drives calculated above.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:14:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Week 4 Blogpolling</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2010/09/20/week-4-blogpolling/#comment-79587241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"But USC's already on probation" "They are? Well as of this moment, they are on double secret probation!" Like the rankings, but would definitely drop Boise out of the Top 5. Alabama, Ohio State, Nebraska, Oregon and Texas would round out my Top 5. How do you justify dropping Oregon after that offensive clinic they have been consistently putting on for 3 straight weeks?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:19:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toughest Venues: #3 Camp Randall Stadium</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2008/05/28/toughest-venues-3-camp-randall-stadium/#comment-79586027</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup, in fact this piece lists Camp Randall Stadium's capacity at 80,321 right in the attendance section.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>