<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for newsmonster09</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/newsmonster09/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/newsmonster09/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:18:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hillary Clinton’s Visit: Any Hope for Africans?</title><link>http://www.newstimeafrica.com/archives/1745#comment-14964906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's a huge opportunity for positive development of African relationships with world powers. It's unfortunate that instead, the US media has latched onto the controversial video snippet where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lost her cool.  &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/politics_caught_on_video" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/politics_caught_on_video"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:18:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: "Mental health professionals should avoid telling clients that they can change their sexual orientation"</title><link>http://americablog.com/2009/08/mental-health-professionals-should.html#comment-14447843</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Therapists should encourage the patients to admit who they are, not who they want to be because eventually they won't be able to escape from being SELF!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/apa_rules_out_gay_conversion_therapy" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/apa_rules_out_gay_conversion_therapy"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's amazing to listen to the expert in this vdo says that the therapy was kinda work before because patients believe it changes their sexual orientation. But, it doesn't. The only thing it changes is patient's behavior, not the innate desire! And, this is scary because it makes a lot of people think they're recovered when they're actually not!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bill O'Reilly Goes After GE and NBC News  - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/fnc/bill_oreilly_goes_after_ge_and_nbc_news__123637.asp?red=tn#comment-14353811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I guess this will never end huh? O'Reilly's very good when it comes to attacking Olbermann  without even saying the name! And, we know exactly who that is! But that doesn't mean Olbermann is not good at doing the same thing! Check out how he made fun of O'Reilly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/timeout_in_cable_news_feud_or_not" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/timeout_in_cable_news_feud_or_not"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:28:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Apple Building A Google Voice Clone?</title><link>http://www.i4u.com/article26201.html#comment-13924641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think they are learning from their old rivals.  If what is going around is true, there seems to be some conflicts arising between Steve Jobs and Eric Schmidt.  Schmidt stepped down from the board of directors recently, and it wasn’t long after that that the Google app was struck down.  I wonder if this is a coincidence or not?!  There is a great video that talks about why Schmidt stepped down.   You should check it out:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/a_line_in_the_sand" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/a_line_in_the_sand"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote for the Day:  Rep. Ross on Health Care, Legislating</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/41283/quote-for-the-day-rep-ross-on-health-care-legislating/#comment-13693948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree... we definitely need more of this party bucking... but what stinks, and I know I am not alone on this, is the fact that the health care plan is slowing down, and before long we will be at a hold still.  We NEED this health care plan, and we needed it yesterday.  The Blue Dogs have a lot of nerve to hold this up.  Although, I can agree that we need to talk about what it is that is being signed, but still.  There is only so much that we can take.  I found an interesting video that shows both the pros and cons of this stall.  You should check it out it is pretty interesting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/a_bad_case_of_the_blue_dogs" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/a_bad_case_of_the_blue_dogs"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:41:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NRA claims victory in a high profile loss</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/32444/nra-claims-victory-in-a-high-profile-loss#comment-13483386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;heres a helpful comparison of what the media have been saying about this issue. &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/concealed_weapons_debate_heats_up" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/concealed_weapons_debate_heats_up"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:49:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lunchtime Links</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/52369/lunchtime-links-28#comment-13279509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The timing of this mandate that has is interesting.  &lt;a href="http://Newsy.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Newsy.com"&gt;Newsy.com&lt;/a&gt;'s research found different perspectives on the potential impact of increasing the minimum wage during a recession.  Their findings seem to be more negative than positive: &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/743" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/743"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt; The threat of high unemployment rates and Cost of Goods may be costly for this already downturned economy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:17:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Celebrating the Minimum Wage Increase</title><link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/07/24/celebrating-the-minimum-wage-increase/#comment-13276826</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are many news outlets that aren't as optimistic about the minimum wage increase.  The higher wages may cause many employees to loose their job, or worse, a large number of small businesses many go out of business. &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/the_cost_of_minimum_wage_hike" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/the_cost_of_minimum_wage_hike"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt; How does that help the economy?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:22:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BAE says  1,400 at  work on F-22 safe</title><link>http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090723/NEWS01/307239893#comment-13225683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since the war on terror is fading away, I don't see any points of spending huge amount of budget having F-22. The plan to build F-35 instead makes sense because it's cheaper and STILL can defense our country. This is what you have to do to optimize your spending. They have to get the most out of every single dollar they spent. That includes a budget management action like this. It's for sure that people will lost their jobs, but doesn't that happen everyday anyway?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/f_22_funding_shot_down" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/f_22_funding_shot_down"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Think about the "30 hours" maintenance and about $40,000 spending every hour this jet is on the air! That's a whole lot of money we can spend on something else more important.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:58:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heritage&amp;#8217;s Bob Moffit to Speak at Pajamas TV Health Care Forum</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/in-the-news/heritages-bob-moffit-to-speak-at-pajamas-tv-healthcare-forum/#comment-13131320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Obama wants the Health Care bill to be passed by August 8th. That's a risky move by Obama. Currently, he doesn't have the votes. And, I agree with a writer from the Kansas City Star, &lt;br&gt;“A delay is appropriate; health care reform can't be handled in a slapdash manner. The issue is too important. And it would be too costly -- in terms of money and in terms of Americans' health care -- to rush a bad plan through.” Media outlets are having a field day. Through various perspectives, how important is it to make the August 8th deadline? &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/the_health_care_bill_urgency" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/the_health_care_bill_urgency"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:05:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: birther movement continues</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=51489#comment-12827972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it has become somewhat dangerous to make statements like this. Rachel Maddow did a good segment on it a while back which I am too lazy to look for, but you should check it out. Her point was that, it is dangerous when a swath of people believe that the President is illegitimate. It is the kind of hostile, not-so-subtly racist belief that can lead to crazy fringe group violence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:24:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sotomayor:  Day Three, More of the S(h)ame?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/39331/sotomayor-day-three-more-of-the-shame/#comment-12717949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Sotomayor doesn't get elected to the Supreme Court, Moderates and Republicans would be able to ease up on the tension and breathe. Not because everyone "hates Sotomayor." It's because it would prove that the Democrats in congress can and will think on their own terms. It would show Obama that having a "super-majority" congress doesn't mean you'll get everything you want. Our government is set up as a checks and balances system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's also interesting how many media organizations, such as CNN, have been interviewing Latina Women to show Sotomayor's legitimacy. &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/sotomayor_running_wise_latina_into_the_ground" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/sotomayor_running_wise_latina_into_the_ground"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt; I feel like multiple perspective from multiple ethnicities would be more convincing. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:09:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real World Italy &amp;#8212; The G8 Summit</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/real-world-italy-the-g8-summit/#comment-12334497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The truth is that the G8 summit doesn't accomplish as much as they would like you to believe. News organizations from all over the world question its strength and validity. &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/g8_summit_a_question_of_effectiveness" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/g8_summit_a_question_of_effectiveness"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:28:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Honduras and the Rule of Law</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38390/honduras-and-the-rule-of-law/#comment-12262623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Obama administration needs to clearly state why they are in support of Zeyala so that all this questioning can be put to rest. If we know his true beliefs on the subject, it will be easier to analyze his perspective. According to France 24, "Weary of appearing too close to U.S. adversary Chavez, conservative leaders don’t want to rock the boat and upset Washington.” &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/welcome_anywhere_but_home" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/welcome_anywhere_but_home"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt; Ironic how we now side with Zeyala. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:52:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Two Days From Paying Bills With IOUs?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/37356/california-two-days-from-paying-bills-with-ious/#comment-12052159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;California has dug itself into a hole that may soon empty out into the ocean on the other end: &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/california_s_new_currency" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/california_s_new_currency"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gov Schwarzenegger Terminates Nexus Tax, Overstock Going Back to Cali</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2009/07/02/gov-schwarzenegger-terminates-nexus-tax-overstock-going-back-to-cali/#comment-12051185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Taxes or not, this is the wrong time to be writing IOUs: &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/california_s_new_currency" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/california_s_new_currency"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:39:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Q2 Cable Ratings: CNN Finishes Third in Prime Time - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/q2-cable-ratings-cnn-finishes-third-in-prime-time/29010#comment-12050305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This recap sums it up about Fox: &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/fox_news_wins_latest_ratings_battle" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/fox_news_wins_latest_ratings_battle"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:07:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Q2 Cable Ratings: CNN Finishes Third in Prime Time - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/q2-cable-ratings-cnn-finishes-third-in-prime-time/29010#comment-12050210</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This recap sums it up about Fox: &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/fox_news_wins_latest_ratings_battle" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/fox_news_wins_latest_ratings_battle"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:03:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Franken vs Coleman: the final showdown</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.com/32383/franken-vs-coleman-the-final-showdown#comment-11997849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;PBS Newshour states, "I think it’s very telling that for these seven months that this process has dragged out, you have not seen Al Franken do any of that temperament stuff that some had suggested he would." &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/franken_funnyman_or_senator" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/franken_funnyman_or_senator"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt; Although Republicans think his election is a "joke," he isn't taking it as one. Good for him. Many comics are intelligent people who notice details that others pass by. Hopefully his nomination will mean good things for the US. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:52:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Having 10 Best Picture Nominees Will Affect You</title><link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=46336#comment-11899764</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the idea of not having a limit, and requiring movies to reach a certain threshold, which is what they are going to do for the Original Song category. But the expansion has caused a lot of controversy : &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/oscars_and_then_there_were_ten" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/oscars_and_then_there_were_ten"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Having no-limit would solve the voting problem. With more movies up for scrutiny, a film can win with a smaller proportion of the vote, which could further alienate viewers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:35:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oscars to Increase Best Picture Nominees to 10</title><link>http://www.lakeshorelaments.com/?p=2549#comment-11896520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the decision has let to some strong reactions: &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/oscars_and_then_there_were_ten" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/oscars_and_then_there_were_ten"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;but I think the opposite is true, that true art house movies get buried under the weight of commercially successful movies like Benjamin Button( which was awful and way too long). Expanding the category makes rooms for gems like In Bruges to make it into the best picture category.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:48:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oscar Changes Standards for Best Song; Hopes to Quell Controversy</title><link>http://www.themovingarts.com/oscar-changes-standards-for-best-song-hopes-to-quell-controversy/#comment-11886218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is a move legitimate change than the decision to expand the Best Picture category to ten ( see more here &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/oscars_and_then_there_were_ten)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/oscars_and_then_there_were_ten)"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;. Think about the year before last when Enchanted, that's right Enchanted had like 3 songs nominated. Which was ridiculous,  I would rather have lost the category then have to sit through those songs. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:01:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sanford Planned to be Away for Ten Days -- Taegan Goddard's Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2009/06/25/sanford_planned_to_be_away_for_ten_days.html#comment-11747642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Quickie video that nicely chronicles the Sanford scandal: &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/from_argentina_with_love_and_apologies" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/from_argentina_with_love_and_apologies"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:29:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Green Dam Youth Escort: Not an Environmentalist &amp;#8220;Dating&amp;#8221; Service for Young People.</title><link>http://www.8asians.com/2009/06/19/the-green-dam-youth-escort-not-an-environmentalist-dating-service-for-young-people/#comment-11452808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The chinese netizens already left 10,400 comments on an anti-Green Dam website called &lt;a href="http://issw365.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="issw365.org"&gt;issw365.org&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/chinese_filter_a_no_go" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/chinese_filter_a_no_go"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt; They are voicing their frustrations and opinions against Green Dam strongly. However, I don't think their voice will be able to stop the Chinese government. But, through other reports, it sounds like the Green Dam system will contain holes that Chinese citizens can filter through to beat the governments censorship. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newsmonster09</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:52:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>