<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for neven</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/neven/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/neven/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:40:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mission Statement by Neven Dološ, Head of Open Moon</title><link>http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/lunar/teams/c-base-open-moon/blog/mission-statement-by-neven-dolo%C5%A1-head-of-open-moon#comment-20135558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...really interesting idea! if the rocket would get up perpendicular to gravitational gradients so the centers of masses of the rockets lie exactly over each other (and the rope could stand the heat of the thrust) this could certainly work. i guess the problem starts when the leading rocket starts to incline. the following rockest wouldn't follow the same route any more and start to disturb the leading rocket. nice to calculate (or simulate)...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">neven</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:40:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mission Statement by Neven Dološ, Head of Open Moon</title><link>http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/lunar/teams/c-base-open-moon/blog/mission-statement-by-neven-dolo%C5%A1-head-of-open-moon#comment-20135497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...so do i! best wishes and good luck!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">neven</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:39:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mission Statement by Neven Dološ, Head of Open Moon</title><link>http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/lunar/teams/c-base-open-moon/blog/mission-statement-by-neven-dolo%C5%A1-head-of-open-moon#comment-20135416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...thank you very much! greetings from berlin!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">neven</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:38:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mission Statement by Neven Dološ, Head of Open Moon</title><link>http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/lunar/teams/c-base-open-moon/blog/mission-statement-by-neven-dolo%C5%A1-head-of-open-moon#comment-20135366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank you! good to be here!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">neven</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:37:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mission Statement by Neven Dološ, Head of Open Moon</title><link>http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/lunar/teams/c-base-open-moon/blog/mission-statement-by-neven-dolo%C5%A1-head-of-open-moon#comment-20135223</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...really interesting idea! if the rocket would get up perpendicular to the gravitational gradients, so the centers of masses of the rockest would lie exactly over each other (neglecting turbulences and heat from thrust) this could certainly work. i guess the problem starts when the leading rocket starts to incline. the following rockets wouldn't follow any more the same route and start to disturb the leading rocket. can you solve this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;neven&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">neven</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:35:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>