<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for nathanbush</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/nathanbush/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/nathanbush/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:45:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How iPhone shapes social media</title><link>http://www.digitaltip.com.au/index.php/how-iphone-shapes-social-media/#comment-10906594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post Tip. Good timing too - will be interested to see how these stats have changed in 12 months when the new iPhone is released and everyone has had the chance to get out of their current contract and onto an iPhone have done so.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:45:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Twitter strategies for Australian brands</title><link>http://www.digitaltip.com.au/index.php/10-twitter-strategies-for-australian-brands/#comment-9976509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Damn Disqus deleted my last comment... It's a really good chart Tip - well done! When expanded, it would be really valuable for demonstarting to clients the power of Twitter, rather than just explaining what it is. I regularly feel like an idiot when I'm explaining what Twitter is and how it is relationship based not broadcast based. Using examples such as these will help brand managers see the value and I'm sure one fo the ten executions will resonate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was thinking that it could almost be presented as a pyrmaid with the top right corner (two way talking) being the pinnacle and the goal and the bottom left (one way listening) being the base and foundation. What do you think? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:46:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could You Charge Your Client $14.7m to Create a Social Network?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/could-you-send-147m-bill-to-your-client.html#comment-9235838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Update: Response received - &lt;a href="http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/05/livewire-semi-response-from-non-conroy.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/05/livewire-semi-response-from-non-conroy.html"&gt;http://anotheradvertisingwa...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:23:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Connecting with your audience through social networks. Have you already missed the boat?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/05/connecting-with-your-audience-through.html#comment-9004047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fair point Zoe. I'm only in the early phases of trying out TweetDeck and SocialThing so I don't have the 'how' yet. Matt did you have any suggestions here? Maybe it's a good one for a follow up on execution in a few months. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:43:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The $14.7M charity website</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/news/2009/04/the_147m_charity_website.php#comment-8190545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good work on keeping this misuse of funds in the spotlight. Unfortunately no response yet. Will keep trying and let you know if we get anything from Sen Conroy. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:10:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could You Charge Your Client $14.7m to Create a Social Network?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/could-you-send-147m-bill-to-your-client.html#comment-7335722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Kevin - seems to be a lot of these stories coming in from this post. Seems many have established or planned networks for a fraction of the cost. Hopefully we get some answers from Senator Conroy. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:15:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could You Charge Your Client $14.7m to Create a Social Network?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/could-you-send-147m-bill-to-your-client.html#comment-7335650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just sent off a letter to Senator Conroy asking for some clarification on the allocation of money for this project. &lt;a href="http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/letter-to-senator-conroy.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/letter-to-senator-conroy.html"&gt;http://anotheradvertisingwa...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:10:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could You Charge Your Client $14.7m to Create a Social Network?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/could-you-send-147m-bill-to-your-client.html#comment-7309475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;oh come on... just a little bite?? I'm actually blaming that on Matt. It was him. Go get him!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could You Charge Your Client $14.7m to Create a Social Network?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/could-you-send-147m-bill-to-your-client.html#comment-7126091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's a reason for that. I'm not going into details for fear of crucifiction from both blondes and brunettes which would only leave the redheads to save me (and I haven't been so kind to them in past lives)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:19:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could You Charge Your Client $14.7m to Create a Social Network?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/could-you-send-147m-bill-to-your-client.html#comment-7126064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Couldn't have said it better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:17:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could You Charge Your Client $14.7m to Create a Social Network?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/could-you-send-147m-bill-to-your-client.html#comment-7126056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great point Daniel. As you can see above - there are a number of questions to be answered both from myself and commentors. Will chase up in the next week... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:17:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could You Charge Your Client $14.7m to Create a Social Network?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/could-you-send-147m-bill-to-your-client.html#comment-7126040</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really? $735 per member is reasonable? But good point that this is assuming they get to 20,000 members as well. I just have an issue with what $735 per patient could go towards in hospital resources. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:16:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Way To Increase Legal Music Purchases</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/way-to-increase-legal-music-purchases.html#comment-6989451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely agree mate - I loved Nick's post and his take on the industry&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 07:00:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Way To Increase Legal Music Purchases</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/way-to-increase-legal-music-purchases.html#comment-6989440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly Graham - it's not that the industry is unprofitable, but the $ has to come from a different way. And consumers aren't backlashing against music per se (ticket sales are up) but against the distribution model. They spoke up and demonstrated that they weren't happy with place, time, price - no labels listened and they got themselves to this point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:58:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxtel's Online Consumer Failings</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/foxtels-online-consumer-failings.html#comment-6752950</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good to know, thanks McLovin  (if that is your real name.... is it??)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:52:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxtel's Online Consumer Failings</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/foxtels-online-consumer-failings.html#comment-6752934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree- when you do get someone on the phone they are very helpful. I suspect that it's not skills in customer management they lack but online interaction knowledge and implementation which is either not valued as highly as it should be or largely ignored.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:52:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxtel's Online Consumer Failings</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/03/foxtels-online-consumer-failings.html#comment-6752896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep - you're Optus example is a good demonstration as well. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:50:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Interesting Occupations Worth Following On Twitter</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/02/10-interesting-occupations-worth.html#comment-6582429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good idea. Or easier still, they may use it as a dating tool in which case you can just find a rich husband and become a lady of leisure!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:27:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Interesting Occupations Worth Following On Twitter</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/02/10-interesting-occupations-worth.html#comment-6582386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did - call it procrastination from writing anything serious. And I'm sure you follow them for their 'tweets' you dirty, dirty man. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:26:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Interesting Occupations Worth Following On Twitter</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/02/10-interesting-occupations-worth.html#comment-6582351</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ha- I was considering football coach. Imagine if Wayne Bennett or Mick Milthouse tweeted their thoughts during a game&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:23:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Ads  &amp;amp; Get Rich Schemes</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/news/2009/02/facebook_ads_get_rich_schemes.php#comment-6322100</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha! On my RSS Feeder there was an ad directly below this post which said "I'm rich. You're Not. I Cracked THe Code To Making Money. See How I Make $3 Million Per Year". FAIL. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:51:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social. To Be, Or Not To Be?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/02/social-to-be-or-not-to-be.html#comment-6316872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personal experience?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social. To Be, Or Not To Be?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/02/social-to-be-or-not-to-be.html#comment-6316862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did exactly the same thing. Now my only worry is making sure that I stay awake long enough to enter all the data into my bedpost diary. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:16:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social. To Be, Or Not To Be?</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/02/social-to-be-or-not-to-be.html#comment-6316851</link><description>&lt;p&gt;would be very handy for adventurous people such as yourself Matt for going "wherever the moment takes you"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:15:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plan to Plan Without A Plan</title><link>http://anotheradvertisingwanker.blogspot.com/2009/02/plan-to-plan-without-plan.html#comment-6304321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ha... what's your budget?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathanbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:32:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>