<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for nate1</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/nate1/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/nate1/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:43:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Claims of nutritional superiority of organic milk, meat challenged by scientists</title><link>https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/02/16/claims-nutritional-superiority-organic-milk-meat-challenged-scientists/#comment-2521862311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the US at least very few dairy cattle graze anymore. Most are fed a diet of fermented forages as well as grain.  There isn't much of the US where grazing year round would feasible and we in the dairy industry like to be consistent so feeding fermented forages year round is the best way to meet that goal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:43:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Claims of nutritional superiority of organic milk, meat challenged by scientists</title><link>https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/02/16/claims-nutritional-superiority-organic-milk-meat-challenged-scientists/#comment-2519970192</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They're talking about the differences between cows grazing fresh grass versus fermented forages.  Most cows get the latter but part of being organic requires the cattle to be able to graze part of the year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Corn silage and haylage which is what most dairy cattle eat year round doesn't contain nearly as much Omega 3s (or loses them during fermentation) as fresh grass does.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dairy rations can be balanced for Omega fatty acids but the research is still young and most of the time it isn't profitable to do so, however, future research may show more benefits which would encourage more producers to balance rations this way which may cause conventional milk to catch up to grass-fed cattle on this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:21:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Organic Milk Vs. Regular Milk: Why I&amp;#8217;m Ditching Organic.</title><link>https://fitnessreloaded.com/organic-milk-vs-regular-milk/#comment-2012606216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;RoundUp is pretty much the safest herbicide on the market. It works by disrupting a pathway that is only found in plants, not in humans and other animals and any residue is long gone by the time the crops are harvested for livestock feed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for your other point, as the infographic shows, most of the drugs we get to use on cattle aren't used in people anymore, they're old tech.  Your doctor prescribing high-powered antibiotics to treat simple ear infections is doing worse things than the livestock industry is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 21:15:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNBC Ratings Tankage | Blog - Daily Options Report</title><link>http://dailyoptionsreport.com/blog/post/cnbc-ratings-tankage/#comment-21180757</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of my big problems with CNBC is that their interviews are so short the interviewee doesn't have time to really say anything.  I might have ADD, and I still can't keep up with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:26:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Workin&amp;#8217; It | Blog - Daily Options Report</title><link>http://dailyoptionsreport.com/blog/post/workin-it/#comment-19302695</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like looking through charts for consolidation patterns then trading options on the breakouts, in the style of Jeff Kohler from the &lt;a href="http://Optionaddict.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Optionaddict.net"&gt;Optionaddict.net&lt;/a&gt;.  Buy some OTMs on the breakout and hold till resistance/support or the price target.  You have to be pretty good at managing losses though, thats where I fail a lot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't look at anywhere nearly 3000 though, maybe 300-400 a month, but I don't trade for a living either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:20:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/31 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/30/weekly-watchlist-0831.html#comment-16441160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't run a blog and I don't really hang out much at anyone eleses much anymore.  However, everything I know about trading, I learned from Jeff Kohler, so just go read all the old posts in this blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/31 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/30/weekly-watchlist-0831.html#comment-15839577</link><description>&lt;p&gt;GLD had a stellar breakout today.  I  kinda thought about buying some calls yesterday as it was pretty clear by then that SLV had broken out, and why shouldn't GLD follow?  But I didn't. :(&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the case could be made that  ABX broke out today as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:14:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GLD Member | Blog - Daily Options Report</title><link>http://dailyoptionsreport.com/blog/post/gld-member/#comment-15839375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;GLD broke out of a symmetrical triangle today, target 1050ish. I would bet it stalls at least for a while at 1000, but if it breaks though that, where will it go? Surely all the suer bullish gold bug type people already have all they want, right?  I'm interested to see what happens.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:10:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/31 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/30/weekly-watchlist-0831.html#comment-15681652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm beginning to wonder if I drew the pattern wrong and Friday was the breakout.  That would explain the volume spike.  I guess we'll see what happens tomorrow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:32:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/31 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/30/weekly-watchlist-0831.html#comment-15681628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That would make more sense than an inverse HandS after the stock has bottomed already.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:32:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/31 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/30/weekly-watchlist-0831.html#comment-15650605</link><description>&lt;p&gt;not looking so great now, are they. . . &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:17:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/31 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/30/weekly-watchlist-0831.html#comment-15625749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some I found, not cross checked against your list:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DOV-Looks like it may be a triple top, or it may just be forming a horizontal channel/consolidation pattern.&lt;br&gt;SLV/GLD-still forming triangles, looks like GLD should breakout in the next week or two if its going to. I bought a couple puts on SLV on Firday as I don't think its ready to break out yet and I think it will back away from its upper trendline.&lt;br&gt;GGG-formed and brokeout of a inverse head and shoulders and retested, may be a good one if you want to just buy the stock, doesn't look like its going to move fast enough to bother with options.&lt;br&gt;SHS-forming a pennant. probably going to be a failed pattern unless it breaks out Monday&lt;br&gt;TEX, GFF-Broke out last week, if it retests it might be a good buy&lt;br&gt;PWR, DAKT-Forming symm triangle&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CMP-descending triangle&lt;br&gt;MON-potential inverse H&amp;amp;S (should be at the bottom of a down trend) both shoulders have formed, now it just needs to breakout. Target ~100&lt;br&gt;AEM-symmetrical triangle (use a line chart)&lt;br&gt;ABX-symm triangle&lt;br&gt;BVN-start of a symm triangle&lt;br&gt;GRS-H&amp;amp;S? I bought some puts on this a while back on what I thought was a breakdown, but I guess it wasn't&lt;br&gt;NAK-descending triangle, but not a very pretty one&lt;br&gt;CRK-descending triangle&lt;br&gt;STR-ascending triangle&lt;br&gt;ACI ascending triangle&lt;br&gt;RIG-symm triangle&lt;br&gt;XOM-symm triangle&lt;br&gt;BHI-ascending triangle&lt;br&gt;MMP-support bounce&lt;br&gt;HL-descending triangle&lt;br&gt;CLF-symm triangle&lt;br&gt;CMC-ascending triangle&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:01:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Retracement Achieved on NASDAQ</title><link>http://slopeofhope.com/2009/08/double-retracement-achieved-on-nasdaq.html#comment-15539741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What do you guys make of SLV? The volume is a little heavier than the past month or so, its hitting the upper trendline of a symmetrical triangle too, but it hasn't broken out.  Looking at the option activity, it looks pretty even calls vs puts until you get out to Jan where the puts have traded much more actively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It'd be a good spot to buy calls in anticipation of a breakout, or puts to ride back down, but I don't really know which way to go.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:18:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discussing DISQUS</title><link>http://slopeofhope.com/2009/08/discussing-disqus.html#comment-15247791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that on a blog that gets as many comments as this, live updating might almost be annoying, but we shall see.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:31:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/17 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/16/weekly-watchlist-0817.html#comment-15192760</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is DXO forming a kinda ugly cup and handle?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:25:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gas Pains</title><link>http://slopeofhope.com/2009/08/gas-pains.html#comment-15146702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When I asked that, it was as much about your philosophy as it was that particular trade.  I don't care which way gold goes, I just want to be there when it breaks out, which I'm not sure has happened yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As per volume, I rarely see you use it on the charts you post. I thought maybe you don't look at it, and maybe I worry too much about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:05:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gas Pains</title><link>http://slopeofhope.com/2009/08/gas-pains.html#comment-15141002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Corn could be putting in a double bottom, but as far as I can tell there's going to be a large crop this year, though the traders in Chicago don't always care about that if they think there is a place for it to go.  Unless they  bump up the ethanol mandate though, or the dollar really plummets, I don''t know what we are going to do with it all as a lot of livestock producers have been forced out or have cut back.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Basically, I expect corn to head towards 2.50 more than I see it going back up, but anything can happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:58:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gas Pains</title><link>http://slopeofhope.com/2009/08/gas-pains.html#comment-15140582</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reposting since I always manage to post right before you make a new post:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tim, about your asset post earlier today (GLD) isn't that a fairly poor trendline with just 2-3 pretty far apart touches? Wouldn't it be better to draw a tighter symmetrical triangle with the bottom trendling starting in late april? It hasn't broken out of that yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you consider volume very often in your trading? I guess I come from the JK school of thought that if there isn't a volume spike it probably isn't a breakout, or at least not one worth trading.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:47:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PowerShares Exchange</title><link>http://slopeofhope.com/2009/08/powershares-exchange.html#comment-15140097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tim, about your asset post earlier today (GLD) isn't that a fairly poor trendline with just 2-3 pretty far apart touches?  Wouldn't it be better to draw a tighter symmetrical triangle with the bottom trendling starting in late april?  It hasn't broken out of that yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you consider volume very often in your trading?  I guess I come from the JK school of thought that if there isn't a volume spike it probably isn't a breakout, or at least not one worth trading.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:37:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/10 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/10/weekly-watchlist-0810.html#comment-15105075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, I found it because a blogger posted about heavy activity in one of the AMZN put series, so I pulled up a chart and drew some lines and presto.  Didn't trade it though :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:21:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/10 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/10/weekly-watchlist-0810.html#comment-14797768</link><description>&lt;p&gt;AMZN is forming a little descending triangle, targets about 79-80 when it breaks.  There is also an ascending trendline that comes into about that area, maybe a little higher that should provide support&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;.  Lots of activity in the SEP 80 puts today.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:40:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/10 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/10/weekly-watchlist-0810.html#comment-14693139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome, I already had NXG and BCR on my lists.  I may suck at trading, but at least you've taught me pattern recognition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:32:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trading Addicts: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/03 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/2/trading-addicts-weekly-watchlist-0803.html#comment-14632967</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He runs a pay site now, so pay up or stop crying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:38:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trading Addicts: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/03 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/2/trading-addicts-weekly-watchlist-0803.html#comment-14610837</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here are some patterns that I see, trade at your own risk. Some of these are pretty cheap stocks.  Hope I don't duplicate any symbols, and I haven't cross checked this with Jeff's list, so there may be some copies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ascending Triangles: NEM, BQI, SRCH, KGS, CRS, NXG, STR, GFF, OSG, XRA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Descending Triangles: CMP, EXH, CIR, BCR&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Symm Triangles: GLD, GMET, OMNI, IOC, PETD, MVG, CLF, GBG, XOM, FPP, DPTR, RBY (looks like a breakdown today, but the volume doesn't back that up) DAKT, ABX,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Head and Shoulders: GRS--breakdown could be a little lower, but the volume was there today.  Target of about 4.50&lt;br&gt;NBL--forming right shoulder&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Inverse H&amp;amp;S: SM-watch for a retest. FWLT already breaking out&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Potential Breakouts: EOG, MMR, BBEP, HERO, SD, AKS, PXD, ATPG, BDC, BZH, BDK, LECO, DE (UNT, CAM, CPX, TRMA, ICOC, CBS, watch for retest) BIDU--Only 80 points from its alltime high!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:12:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trading Addicts: Weekly Watchlist&amp;nbsp;08/03 -   Blog  - Jeff Kohler the Option Addict | Stock and Options Trading</title><link>http://www.optionaddict.net/blog/2009/8/2/trading-addicts-weekly-watchlist-0803.html#comment-14591297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Short GRS&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:55:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>