<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for name255</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/name255/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/name255/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:00:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: SeaTown Sports: ESPN's College Football Mock Draft = FAILURE</title><link>http://www.seatownsports.net/2009/08/espns-college-football-mock-draft.html#comment-14352542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"and what you've done in the 21st century is more important than what happened in the 1930s."&lt;br&gt; You can't honestly expect them to pick a team that didn't win a single game last season and is 18-54 since 2003 to be in the top 40. And by the way, I agree this whole thing is kind of stupid, I just disagree that the Huskies belong in the group.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">name255</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:00:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SeaTown Sports: ESPN's College Football Mock Draft = FAILURE</title><link>http://www.seatownsports.net/2009/08/espns-college-football-mock-draft.html#comment-14007968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seriously? UW as one of the top-40 programs in college football? And you're mad they're not there? Really? How about you win a game, then you can argue being on the list. How about you don't get beat by one of the least talented BCS schools in history, then you can argue being on the list. The UW is nowhere close to one of the top-40 programs in college football and hasn't been for a while (i.e. 2001).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">name255</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:57:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>