<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for msuster</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/msuster/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/msuster/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2017 14:19:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Should Your Company Be Profitable?</title><link>http://avc.com/2017/06/should-your-company-be-profitable/#comment-3368342765</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Fred. You and I are, as usual, in the exact same position in this regard. I push for reduced burn rates and profitability and pragmatic growth. What prompted my article is the blind statement that "this company isn't profitable and therefore must be a house of cards" mentality of people who don't take the time to understand the accounting or economics of startups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One small additional thought. I have always been from the school of thought that you can't just keep adding sales reps to fuel your growth but the one person who has proven me wrong consistently is my former boss Marc Benioff. I remember him telling me how we'd get to $1bn in sales and there was a predictable nature because he could add sales reps at a predictable level and with consistent results. He's now at $8.4 billion in sales and $61 billion market cap. He's always run &lt;a href="http://Salesforce.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Salesforce.com"&gt;Salesforce.com&lt;/a&gt; differently than my gut feel would have said and he's consistently been right. I've learned much from Marc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2017 14:19:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Importance of Teams and Why the Best Leaders Cultivate Them</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/04/17/the-importance-of-teams/#comment-2629768929</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes. culture and norms certainly start at the top. i also agree that it's hard to have team members who are allergic to feedback&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:08:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Importance of Teams and Why the Best Leaders Cultivate Them</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/04/17/the-importance-of-teams/#comment-2629767029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks for sharing that read. and you won't regret GPS. It's on CNN every Sunday morning.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:07:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Importance of Teams and Why the Best Leaders Cultivate Them</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/04/17/the-importance-of-teams/#comment-2629765960</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes. i think we rewrite history around individuals because somehow the narrative is easier to consume&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:06:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Avoid Being Disrupted as a VC</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/04/10/avoid-disrupted-vc/#comment-2617764514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Somebody told me a long time ago the only way not to be replaced is to make yourself replaceable"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This was the first message you were taught at my very first job at Andersen Consulting (now Accenture). Your job is to hire and build a great team and to train them and make yourself replaceable. That has always stuck with me. Great leaders are self confident enough to hire people as good or better than them. Weak leaders won't hire people who challenge them. That's why A's beget A's and B's beget C's.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:33:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Avoid Being Disrupted as a VC</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/04/10/avoid-disrupted-vc/#comment-2617155598</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, David. Plus, I also had 10 years experience running startups with plenty of hand-on marketing experience. We value the ability to cut through the clutter for sure. As you said, it must start with a great product but in the end you do need to get through the noise&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:57:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Inside Scoop on the Funding Environment and What it Might Mean for You</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/30/inside-scoop-funding-environment-might-mean/#comment-2599869619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the challenge is the trade off between growth and profits. we could be profitable in 2 seconds. but it would hurt growth rates. thus venture.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 22:10:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Inside Scoop on the Funding Environment and What it Might Mean for You</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/30/inside-scoop-funding-environment-might-mean/#comment-2599868841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes, but given smaller check sizes slightly faster processes&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 22:09:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Inside Scoop on the Funding Environment and What it Might Mean for You</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/30/inside-scoop-funding-environment-might-mean/#comment-2599868383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks, dave. appreciate it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 22:09:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Inside Scoop on the Funding Environment and What it Might Mean for You</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/30/inside-scoop-funding-environment-might-mean/#comment-2599868238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ha. thanks. sometimes it felt like reality tv&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 22:09:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Inside Scoop on the Funding Environment and What it Might Mean for You</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/30/inside-scoop-funding-environment-might-mean/#comment-2599867947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah. but I don't pay too much attention to that. it's a "signal" but not too much more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 22:09:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Inside Scoop on the Funding Environment and What it Might Mean for You</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/30/inside-scoop-funding-environment-might-mean/#comment-2599867515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;part of it is "market permitting" - good luck&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 22:08:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Inside Scoop on the Funding Environment and What it Might Mean for You</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/30/inside-scoop-funding-environment-might-mean/#comment-2599867091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank you, eric. but mostly the kudos goes to you and the team for staying focused and delivering with customers and products and technology. onward and upward!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 22:08:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Inside Scoop on the Funding Environment and What it Might Mean for You</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/30/inside-scoop-funding-environment-might-mean/#comment-2597266959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank you, jess. this was a story a long-time in the making that I wish I could have told throughout but where I had hinted all along that "the times, they were a' changin." but i guess it's easier to tell a story with a happy ending :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:22:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Decrease the Odds That Your Startup Fails</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/25/decrease-odds-startup-fails/#comment-2590378580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;let's be honest - we all take uber! we even got an account for my in-laws who are 80 so that if it's bad weather out they don't need to drive themselves to the doctor&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:51:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Decrease the Odds That Your Startup Fails</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/25/decrease-odds-startup-fails/#comment-2590377089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;+100&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:49:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Decrease the Odds That Your Startup Fails</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/25/decrease-odds-startup-fails/#comment-2590376789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think most fail because they build a product that doesn't have strong demand or if it has demand it doesn't have enough demand at a price point that is economic&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:49:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Decrease the Odds That Your Startup Fails</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/25/decrease-odds-startup-fails/#comment-2590375924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank you. appreciate it. I agree with what you say but I would overlay it with enough economic thought or research to say, "should i even bother" before starting&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Decrease the Odds That Your Startup Fails</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/25/decrease-odds-startup-fails/#comment-2590374833</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's part intuition, part talking to enough potential customers about their needs, part trial and error. me thinks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:48:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Decrease the Odds That Your Startup Fails</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/25/decrease-odds-startup-fails/#comment-2590373859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;when the price of storage is so low that you no longer worry about keeping your grandma's furniture I believe we will stimulate new demand. And our future product offering plans are vast. Remember: Amazon started by selling books&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:47:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Decrease the Odds That Your Startup Fails</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/25/decrease-odds-startup-fails/#comment-2590372089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;:) bingo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Decrease the Odds That Your Startup Fails</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/25/decrease-odds-startup-fails/#comment-2590371872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not controversial at all. I say the same thing all the time. Including on a recent SnapStorm on the topic! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:45:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Long Economic Case for Snapchat</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/12/long-case-snapchat/#comment-2566789127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Look at your stories page. Often events are there like key sports matches, debates etc. and if a breaking news story happens like Paris it's immediately there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Re: advice vs. fun ... I think it's ok to do a bit of both. It would be boring if I always just spewed advice. I think most people want to get to know the person, as well. That's the beauty of unscripted social media.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:52:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Long Economic Case for Snapchat</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/12/long-case-snapchat/#comment-2566787419</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1. my article doesn't comment on or make any prediction about market cap. &lt;br&gt;2. I disagree whole-heartedly with the thesis that products should be 100% free and I can give you plenty of counter examples. I think a balance between ad supported and paid is sensible&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:50:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Long Economic Case for Snapchat</title><link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2016/03/12/long-case-snapchat/#comment-2566785570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FB didn't have facial recognition in its early years. It's obviously a much older company. And I don't think SC is built on paid celebrity endorsements.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msuster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>