<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of moonofsilver</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/moonofsilver/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/moonofsilver/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:12:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hail Mary, Full of Grace:&lt;br /&gt;An Evangelical&amp;#8217;s Reappraisal of Mary</title><link>(u'http://evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/2004/12/hail-mary-full-of-gracean-evangelicals-reappraisal-of-mary.html',%2047923372L)#comment-47923372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, the reason is that Roman Catholicism went overboard with devotion to Mary. So Protestants are understandibly skittish about heaping praise on Mary.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2004 23:41:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hail Mary, Full of Grace:&lt;br /&gt;An Evangelical&amp;#8217;s Reappraisal of Mary</title><link>(u'http://evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/2004/12/hail-mary-full-of-gracean-evangelicals-reappraisal-of-mary.html',%2047923386L)#comment-47923386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's get down to brass tacks. None of this can be shown from the Bible. The Roman church has made this binding on all believers, despite this. This is unacceptable. You can believe these teaching if you want, but to make this binding on believers when it has no foundation in the Word of God is not something I can in good conscience accept.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:42:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: International news brands</title><link>(u'https://buzzmachine.com/2007/08/03/international-news-brands/',%20520506481L)#comment-520506481</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What exactly is the problem with getting traffic from Drudge?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:56:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The emergence of media tribes</title><link>(u'https://buzzmachine.com/2007/08/11/the-emergence-of-media-tribes/',%20520545075L)#comment-520545075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One's view of the news media gets affected when the media reports on something you know about. As a Christian, I have read a log regarding apologetics. evidences for the Christian faith, and church history. Every Easter some news magazine is giving a cover story on something Jesus-related. And I'm not too impressed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a pro-lifer, I notice when "anti-abortion" is used instead of "pro-life."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is a weird example: as someone in the Philadelphia area, I see stories which involve negative portrayals of Philadelphia fans. There is a template. It is easier to follow it. It appears, to me, that reporters can be lazy. It takes effort to get away from an assumed template.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Last one: I've heard Rush Limbaugh say that there was an incorrect description about where he works from an early newspaper report about him (or something similar). Once it was in Lexus-Nexus, it will appear from time to time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:43:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Golden Compass Bombs - Is This The Death of New Line Cinema?</title><link>(u'http://www.firstshowing.net/2007/the-golden-compass-bombs-is-this-the-death-of-new-line-cinema/',%20124345408L)#comment-124345408</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the atheism of the series hurt it. Why not the Da Vinci Code or other movies? Because of kids. There is a huge difference between reading or viewing something that challenges beliefs when it is geared towards your kids, esp. if you feel it undermines what you are trying to teach them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, Rendition? No one wants to see movies like that. Hollywood lives in a bubble. Hey, let's make a movie about interrogating terrorists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you want to make money, make G and PG movies that are family-friendly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:51:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Time For Spector To Get A Hobby</title><link>(u'http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016840.php',%20119485L)#comment-119485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, this is about him being from Pennsylvania. He has a lot of Eagles (and possibly Steelers) fans who are interested in how far the cheating went. If it is pandering, it is at a local level.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:39:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain Sits Pretty</title><link>(u'http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016842.php',%20119981L)#comment-119981</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The handwriting is on the wall. McCain will win the nomination and lose badly in the general. His only hope is that Hillary is nominated and blacks sit out due to the race-baiting in their race. Otherwise, he's toast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:21:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Time For Spector To Get A Hobby</title><link>(u'http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016840.php',%20119986L)#comment-119986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Then explain the fine and loss of draft picks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The F7 Pledge</title><link>(u'http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016877.php',%20128238L)#comment-128238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I may vote for McCain while holding my nose with a gas mask on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He will not get one dime from me. Not when he is the main cause of that abomination of free speech-raising money legislation known as McCain-Feingold. Talk about chutzpah. He needs money to express himself freely on TV?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He gets no part of my hard-earned money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What’s Next for Mike Huckabee? (by Jim Wallis)</title><link>(u'http://www.sojo.net/blog/godspolitics/?p=1901',%202081053L)#comment-2081053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is pretty much known that there is a generosity gap in America.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is between conservatives and liberals. Conservatives are more generous than liberals. They give more. They volunteer more. They even donate more blood. A book was written on this very topic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you get in the mindset where compassion is equated with government action, you will probably do less for your fellow man. It's the government's responsibility. Why should you do anything?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:13:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EBay Pulls Feedback Option for Sellers</title><link>(u'http://www.wired.com/business/2008/05/ebay-feedback/',%20129234789L)#comment-129234789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While in grad school, I read eBay's mission statement (or something like that). It believed in the inherent goodness of mankind. That is why eBay is in trouble. People aren't good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've bought and sold. As a buyer, I'm hoping I'm not going to be scammed. As a seller, I'm hoping the person who bought no insurance or delivery confirmation is being honest when they didn't get something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People only used to being on one side need to realize the problem is on both ends.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:29:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spore: When Games and Science Collide</title><link>(u'http://discoverblogs.sixfeetup.com/loom/2008/09/01/spore-when-games-and-science-collide/',%20299679709L)#comment-299679709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So it's pretty much Intelligent Design: the Game. Whether they intended that or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:12:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spore: When Games and Science Collide</title><link>(u'http://discoverblogs.sixfeetup.com/loom/2008/09/01/spore-when-games-and-science-collide/',%20207938610L)#comment-207938610</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So it's pretty much Intelligent Design: the Game. Whether they intended that or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:12:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smoke and Mirrors, Whales and Lampreys: A Guest Post by Ken Miller</title><link>(u'http://discoverblogs.sixfeetup.com/loom/2009/01/02/smoke-and-mirrors-whales-and-lampreys-a-guest-post-by-ken-miller/',%20299848546L)#comment-299848546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://discoverblogs.sixfeetup.com/loom/2009/01/02/smoke-and-mirrors-whales-and-lampreys-a-guest-post-by-ken-miller/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://discoverblogs.sixfeetup.com/loom/2009/01/02/smoke-and-mirrors-whales-and-lampreys-a-guest-post-by-ken-miller/"&gt;http://discoverblogs.sixfee...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"In Chapter 4 of Darwin’s Black Box I first described the clotting cascade and then, in a section called “Similarities and Differences”, analyzed it in terms of irreducible complexity. Near the beginning of that part I had written, “Leaving aside the system before the fork in the pathway, where details are less well known, the blood clotting system fits the definition of irreducible complexity...  The components of the system (beyond the fork in the pathway) are fibrinogen, prothrombin, Stuart factor, and proaccelerin.” Casey Luskin concludes that from that point on I was focusing my argument on the system beyond the fork in the pathway, containing those components I named. That is a reasonable conclusion because, well, because that’s what I said I was doing, and Mr. Luskin can comprehend the English language.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apparently Prof. Miller can’t. He breathlessly reports that one page after I had qualified my argument I wrote “Since each step necessarily requires several parts, not only is the entire blood-clotting system irreducibly complex, but so is each step in the pathway” and Miller asserts that meant I had inexplicably switched back to considering the whole cascade, including the initial steps. It seems not to have occurred to Miller that that sentence should be read in the context of the previous page..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;[Carl: Geoff is quoting from Michael Behe's latest &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK24TD6BTRVMLKJ" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK24TD6BTRVMLKJ"&gt;Amazon blog post&lt;/a&gt;. Behe does not allow comments there. Comments are welcome here.]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:40:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smoke and Mirrors, Whales and Lampreys: A Guest Post by Ken Miller</title><link>(u'http://discoverblogs.sixfeetup.com/loom/2009/01/02/smoke-and-mirrors-whales-and-lampreys-a-guest-post-by-ken-miller/',%20207941681L)#comment-207941681</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://discoverblogs.sixfeetup.com/loom/2009/01/02/smoke-and-mirrors-whales-and-lampreys-a-guest-post-by-ken-miller/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://discoverblogs.sixfeetup.com/loom/2009/01/02/smoke-and-mirrors-whales-and-lampreys-a-guest-post-by-ken-miller/"&gt;http://discoverblogs.sixfee...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"In Chapter 4 of Darwin’s Black Box I first described the clotting cascade and then, in a section called “Similarities and Differences”, analyzed it in terms of irreducible complexity. Near the beginning of that part I had written, “Leaving aside the system before the fork in the pathway, where details are less well known, the blood clotting system fits the definition of irreducible complexity...  The components of the system (beyond the fork in the pathway) are fibrinogen, prothrombin, Stuart factor, and proaccelerin.” Casey Luskin concludes that from that point on I was focusing my argument on the system beyond the fork in the pathway, containing those components I named. That is a reasonable conclusion because, well, because that’s what I said I was doing, and Mr. Luskin can comprehend the English language.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apparently Prof. Miller can’t. He breathlessly reports that one page after I had qualified my argument I wrote “Since each step necessarily requires several parts, not only is the entire blood-clotting system irreducibly complex, but so is each step in the pathway” and Miller asserts that meant I had inexplicably switched back to considering the whole cascade, including the initial steps. It seems not to have occurred to Miller that that sentence should be read in the context of the previous page..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;[Carl: Geoff is quoting from Michael Behe's latest &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK24TD6BTRVMLKJ" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK24TD6BTRVMLKJ"&gt;Amazon blog post&lt;/a&gt;. Behe does not allow comments there. Comments are welcome here.]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:40:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Time to short Jenny Craig?</title><link>(u'http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2009/02/time-to-short-jenny-craig/4719',%2036779793L)#comment-36779793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First, I found myself getting more and more generic brands. Then, I found myself shopping more and more at Aldi, which is much cheaper than Wal-Mart or Target. Then, I started using a chain near Philly called Produce Junction in combination with Aldi. Really, really cheap produce. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I find I buy more groceries with Aldi and Produce Junction but my dollar goes much further. We are eating out much less and saving a lot of money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is amazing how much money you can save when you commit to being really cheap.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:36:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Time to short Jenny Craig?</title><link>(u'http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2009/02/time-to-short-jenny-craig/4719',%2036779802L)#comment-36779802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, there are differences between Aldi and Wal Mart. About 90+ percent of what Aldi carries is their own generic brands. But the quality of what they have is pretty good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They have a limited selection and don't accept credit cards. That produces a lot of savings for them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:34:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sean Penn's Wonderful Oscars Acceptance Speech</title><link>(u'http://www.firstshowing.net/2009/sean-penns-wonderful-oscars-acceptance-speech/',%20124897865L)#comment-124897865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As someone who would have voted for Prop 8, I would have no problems explaining my vote to my grandkids. Even if culture declines to the point of making gay marriage inevitable. There is a very easy explanation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The real question is whether the lovers of freedom will force me into to a reeducation camp before then.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And to the Netherlands guy, once the Muslims take over in Europe and institute sharia law those rights you love will be gone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:44:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late-term abortion doctor decries Tiller killing: &amp;#8216;This is a fascist movement&amp;#8217;</title><link>(u'http://coloradoindependent.com/30017/late-term-abortion-doctor-decries-tiller-killing-this-is-a-fascist-movement',%2010330317L)#comment-10330317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John Brown resorted to violence to end slavery. Was slavery fine and the abolitionist movement a fascist movement?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:23:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late-term abortion doctor decries Tiller killing: &amp;#8216;This is a fascist movement&amp;#8217;</title><link>(u'http://coloradoindependent.com/30017/late-term-abortion-doctor-decries-tiller-killing-this-is-a-fascist-movement',%2010371839L)#comment-10371839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, abortion is much worse than slavery. It isn't even in the same ballpark.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, I'm criticizing the argument of the abortionist in the article. I'm using the same logical structure and taking it to someplace you don't want to go. It's called the reductio ad absurdum. I suggest you look it up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If some fringes of a movement resort to violence, does that make a movement unjust and what its protesting fine? No. I was just using John Brown in order to show that to you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:30:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ted Olson&amp;#8217;s Case for Gay Marriage</title><link>(u'http://volokh.com/2010/01/10/ted-olsons-case-for-gay-marriage/',%20522413328L)#comment-522413328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why the Equal Protection clause doesn't work here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Everyone is allowed to marry someone of the opposite sex. That rule applies to everyone equally.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:20:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ted Olson&amp;#8217;s Case for Gay Marriage</title><link>(u'http://volokh.com/2010/01/10/ted-olsons-case-for-gay-marriage/',%20522413572L)#comment-522413572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Supporters of this, a question:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How do you avoid the reductio ad absurdum?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why can't I, using your logic, marry my mother? Or fill in the blank with anything else you can think of?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:07:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Asylum in the U.S. for German Homeschoolers?</title><link>(u'http://volokh.com/2010/01/27/asylum-in-the-u-s-for-german-homeschoolers/',%20522428636L)#comment-522428636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on the comments in this forum, they may need protection in this country as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Their faith tells them to raise their kids in a certain way under certain educational influences. Germany doesn't respect their rights as parents to raise them in this way. They would go to jail if they refused.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A country started by a group of Puritans coming over to avoid religious persecution should allow this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:21:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pro-Business Movies</title><link>(u'http://www.theconglomerate.org/2010/02/probusiness-movies.html',%2036470636L)#comment-36470636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The speech from Danny Devito at the end of "Other People's Money" is an ode to creative destruction.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:06:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: E-Donnybrook - Magazine - The Atlantic</title><link>(u'http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2008/03/recent-items-about-info-control-2/7985/',%2038937089L)#comment-38937089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This doesn't have to be like the Windows monopoly world of 90's. There can be two or more winners. Or the success of both can create a dynamic which spur greater demand overall.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geoffrobinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:12:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>