<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for moeffju</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/moeffju/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/moeffju/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:43:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: stalkdaily: Malware als Businessmodell?</title><link>http://www.zweipunktnull.org/blog/2009/04/12/stalkdaily-malware-als-businessmodell/#comment-8208977</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andererseits steht dem der Service gegenüber, der elementare Regeln der Web-Programmierung nicht beachtet und Benutzerinhalte ungefiltert rausbläst. Und anschließend drei Runden braucht, um das Problem zu beheben. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">moeffju</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:43:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Protecting your tweets is meaningless; you can be read on Twitter Search or Google anyway</title><link>http://archive.chris.charabaruk.com/node/1489#comment-7312287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, if you unprotect your account later, all your tweets can potentially be indexed. Twitter Search does not do this currently, they only index when you tweet. Google doesn't normally crawl far back. But still, keep in mind it's possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">moeffju</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:52:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Protecting your tweets is meaningless; you can be read on Twitter Search or Google anyway</title><link>http://archive.chris.charabaruk.com/node/1489#comment-7301478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe you could respond to the comments or update the article. Just to be, you know, media 2.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">moeffju</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:17:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Protecting your tweets is meaningless; you can be read on Twitter Search or Google anyway</title><link>http://archive.chris.charabaruk.com/node/1489#comment-7292062</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Er, no.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When and while your account is unprotected, all tweets you post go out into the search index of Twitter Search, Google, and into FriendFeed at least. When you protect your account, these don't get deleted - what's out is out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tweets send while your account is protected do not go out to anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">moeffju</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:09:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: www.sickr.com - Twitter API Abruflimit</title><link>http://www.sickr.com/post/31040124#comment-308389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Außer Twitter fragen gibt's da IMO nur Screen Scraping. Nicht schön, aber ok.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">moeffju</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>