<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for mjassociates</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/mjassociates/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/mjassociates/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:42:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Applying For A Climate Ready Grant – Part 6</title><link>http://www.technation.com.au/2009/03/18/applying-for-a-climate-ready-grant-%e2%80%93-part-6/#comment-7814937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Feedback from government is that the success rate for this round of Climate Ready was less than 10%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Building on @Peter Nolle's observation, most grants are treated as taxable income meaning that you ultimately pay 30% corporate tax on them if you're successful. That does diminish their value to some extent (but is necessary if you're comparing the after-tax R&amp;amp;D offset value with the before tax grant value).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is also a big difference in the compliance regime under both programs. The R&amp;amp;D tax offset is a self-assessment entitlement system, whereas most grants require you to submit technical and financial statements on a periodic basis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Climate Ready is a $75m four year program, so there is still some funding to be allocated if it is preserved through the current budget process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Provided you meet the eligibility requirements, such as being incorporated, and having good quality planning documentation, applications for the R&amp;amp;D tax offset (and R&amp;amp;D tax concession) close on 30 April 2009 for the standard financial year ended 30 June 2008.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mjassociates</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:42:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: National Innovation Review Documents Released</title><link>http://www.technation.com.au/2008/09/09/national-innovation-review-documents-released/#comment-2251165</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've started pulling apart the R&amp;amp;D tax changes, which look mostly positive for Technation Types. Brief blog post here: &lt;a href="http://snipurl.com/3oovk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://snipurl.com/3oovk"&gt;http://snipurl.com/3oovk&lt;/a&gt; They seem to have taken a very narrow view of "open source software" as code donated rather than released under a bounty, or other commercial arrangement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Further commentary to come on grants, VC etc, just as my interests guide me. It's going to be an interesting road to travel from here to Christmas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;KH - quote away, just attribute ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mjassociates</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:42:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sydney OpenCoffee Hits 400 Members</title><link>http://www.technation.com.au/2008/09/02/sydney-opencoffee-hits-400-members/#comment-2100791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kim, I'm a late starter but got you closer to 100. Congratulations (and thanks again for buying my coffee this morning)! Look forward to many many more Open Coffees. John&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mjassociates</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:44:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Applying For A Climate Ready Grant - Part 1</title><link>http://www.technation.com.au/2008/08/05/applying-for-a-climate-ready-grant-part-1/#comment-1111660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Malcolm, that's certainly very helpful feedback so far. I look forward to your further posts in this series. Let me know if I can be of any assistance. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mjassociates</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deadline For National Innovation Review Report Extended By A Month</title><link>http://www.technation.com.au/2008/08/01/deadline-for-national-innovation-review-report-extended-by-a-month/#comment-1101752</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there is a role for intervention where Australia has clear market problems (or, alternatively the government wants to boldly predict a future "sunrise" or other industry).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suspect, however, that there is more to be gained by creating a business, innovation and investment environment that allows success to happen. We call this the "beehive" model of innovation, a term coined by Michael Johnson...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can read more here: &lt;a href="http://www.innovationisindustrypolicy.com/2008/05/mousestraps-and-beehives-innovation.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.innovationisindustrypolicy.com/2008/05/mousestraps-and-beehives-innovation.html"&gt;http://www.innovationisindu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Feedback welcome :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mjassociates</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:09:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Applying For A Climate Ready Grant - Part 1</title><link>http://www.technation.com.au/2008/08/05/applying-for-a-climate-ready-grant-part-1/#comment-1100238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Malcolm, thanks for posting on this - it's always interesting to hear how AusIndustry are going to handle a new program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From their public materials it seems that the "green" hurdle will only be for basic eligibility and then you're into the traditional 5 factor assessment criteria that they've lifted from Commercial Ready.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thus, it doesn't seem to matter how strong the green credentials of your project are - so it will be very interesting to follow your progress.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a word of caution, though: $75 million sounds like a big number, but if it's divided 16 ways (4 annual rounds over 4 years) it means each round would award, on average, $4.7 million to all successful companies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That alone should be a reason to ensure you have your hat in the ring.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mjassociates</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:16:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>