<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for millerian</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/millerian/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/millerian/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:04:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Suffolk Tweetup</title><link>http://www.jamieriddell.net/2009/10/suffolk-tweetup/#comment-20774607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jamie, I'll be there. Waterfront / Isaacs is a good start for venue?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@millerian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:04:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube introduces the canonical tag on usernames</title><link>http://imlr.org/18/youtube-introduces-the-canonical-tag-on-usernames#comment-15668525</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, it certainly was working before when I tested it. Now I get the canoncial version taking me to the user name with 3 /'s giving an error page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, you're completely right about using the full URL. Without specifying that you are only doing half the job. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@millerian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:19:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media has gone to the dog&amp;#8217;s&amp;#8230;&amp;#8230;.</title><link>http://socialmediafish.com/blog/social-media/social-media-has-gone-to-the-dogs/#comment-15564682</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With Twitter follows I use Topify to screen out spammers and self promotionalists - new word :). But I also go through my stream every so often and click on avatars I don't recongise "noticing" for a while. See their latest 20 or so tweets and unfollow those that I don't find useful. Tweetie on the Mac so easy and quick to do that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I find it disappointing when you follow someone in their (relatively) early Twitter times and then with some spammy sign ups they turn into follow-fiends, rather than giving value and wanting to interact.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can follow around 250 people who are good tweeters, then the rest are either family and friends who aren't prolific or feeds etc. If I feel it's getting too much I go back and unfollow a few people to keep it manageable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@millerian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:00:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shup The Hell Up You Self-Promoting Turd</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/shup-the-hell-up-you-self-promoting-turd/#comment-9237629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Here’s a truth: If you have to tell me you’re the best, you’re not."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just about the most salient point in marketting. The louder you shout the more deaf your audience becomes. They'll listen to their friends telling them about a product over you shouting about it from billboards, it'll greatly increase their buying intent just as you had with the bands of your youth - you considered their use of a product a personal recommendation, not an advertisement. If you empower people they'll become the "friends" of your brand and much more effective voices than a corporate sales patter - just like the Coke Facebook page .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great article Chris.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@millerian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 04:12:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>