Disqus - Latest Comments for michalc

Re: Questions to ask yourself when writing tests - Michal Charemza

michalc — Tue, 02 Jan 2018 03:37:28 -0000

Thanks!

Re: Root2 - Dependency-Based Cache Invalidation

michalc — Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:29:32 -0000

Hi Luke,

Perhaps I should _not_ have promised part 2 so readily... Alas not much more other than a few experiments.

Michal.

Re: Should You Use www. For Your Site?

michalc — Tue, 01 Nov 2016 02:09:48 -0000

You can use AWS's Route53 ALIAS record to point the root/apex domain to a Cloudfront distribution, so I think if you're willing to go with Route53 as your DNS provider, you are not restricted to using CNAMEs + subdomains.

Re: Same-domain iframe communication - Michal Charemza

michalc — Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:18:06 -0000

Sorry about my slow reply... I notice you said "folder". If you're using "file://" then I think most browsers (under default configuration) treat any access to "file://" as cross domain, so the technique here won't work.

Re: Same-domain iframe communication - Michal Charemza

michalc — Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:15:40 -0000

There is a way you can the `scope` function to work even if debug info is disabled. You could set the parent iframe's scope under a data key of `$scope`, which the scope function (which still exists even if debug info is disabled) uses.


appInParentWindow.directive('iframe', function() {
  return {
    restrict: 'E',
    link: function(scope, element) {
      element.data('$scope', scope);
    }
  };
});

You can see this working at http://plnkr.co/edit/EsGn0b...

It's probably a bit hacky though, as the fact that the `scope` function uses a data key `$scope` I don't think is documented and is liable to change. It might be better might be to call `data` directly from the iframe app rather than relying on Angular's `scope` function.

Re: Same-domain iframe communication - Michal Charemza

michalc — Sat, 18 Jul 2015 03:55:03 -0000

No, you haven`t missed anything. If you set

$compileProvider.debugInfoEnabled(false)

then the

scope

function isn't available, and this technique won't work.

As a small attempt to defend myself :-), the abilility to remove the debugging info was added to Angular in the commit https://github.com/angular/..., about a month after I posted this tip.

Re: Using range inputs with Angular

michalc — Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:30:17 -0000

Nice tip!

Re: Same-domain iframe communication - Michal Charemza

michalc — Mon, 11 May 2015 08:07:02 -0000

It's used from within the iframe, not from the parent page, so there is no trouble. It works by how its defined: it is the iframe that contains the page running that code. This is unique from the point of view from inside the iframe, even if there are other iframes in the parent page.

Re: Same-domain iframe communication - Michal Charemza

michalc — Sun, 29 Mar 2015 03:48:16 -0000

Not quite sure what you mean by $compile, as I'm not suggesting to use that in this case. The other use-cases: perhaps yes, the custom Javascript one, or maybe custom CSS that would also only be applicable in an iframe. I think certain rich text-editors loaded their content in an iframe (at least a few years back when I last looked at them), so interacting with something like that might be a case. Other people have posted here that have found this tip useful, so you can always ask them as well :-)

Re: Same-domain iframe communication - Michal Charemza

michalc — Sat, 28 Mar 2015 05:04:04 -0000

There are (or at least were) 3rd party authentication systems that you can load up in an iframe, and after authentication can redirect to a page that you specify, i.e. that can be on the same domain as the parent page. This can then communicate using the techniques given here to the main app that authentication was successful (or failed). Note however, the 3rd party can forbid being loaded in an iframe by certain X-Frame-Options headers.

Re: Same-domain iframe communication - Michal Charemza

michalc — Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:31:33 -0000

You're welcome :-)

Re: Same-domain iframe communication - Michal Charemza

michalc — Thu, 08 Jan 2015 03:28:05 -0000

Good to hear! :-)

Re: Same-domain iframe communication - Michal Charemza

michalc — Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:41:01 -0000

You're very welcome, pleased it was useful.

Re: Using Angular.js Factories To Get Remote Data

michalc — Mon, 02 Sep 2013 02:20:15 -0000

I notice getFruitsAsync takes a callback parameter. Would a "more Angular" way of doing it be to just return the result of the http.get call, which is a promise object, so the calling function can handle the callback, along with any error conditions?

Re: Integrating Pusher With Ember

michalc — Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:02:42 -0000

Great post. Thanks!

A question though: do you know of a way to inject the singleton into data-store adapter instances? I'm trying to use the same singleton in both the route(s) and the in the data store adapter.

Edit: I posted this question at http://stackoverflow.com/qu...

Re: Login Required - Castle Royle Golf & Country Club

michalc — Tue, 15 May 2012 07:22:40 -0000

Hello

Re: FancyUpload - Swiff meets Ajax

michalc — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:24:49 -0000

Oh... this was meant to be in reply to Clem's Unofficial update thread. (But of course the original HistoryManager is great) I think the logging in thingy doesn't work well if you reply to a post, but then need to login. It seems to post it as a new thread.

Re: FancyUpload - Swiff meets Ajax

michalc — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:21:12 -0000

This is great: I've tried it out and it seems to work great! This is exactly what I've been looking for.

Re: FancyUpload - Swiff meets Ajax

michalc — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:27:52 -0000

(Sorry that I posted this in a new thread and also replied to my old one as well... I must have got confused!)

Re: FancyUpload - Swiff meets Ajax

michalc — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:26:15 -0000

However, I have now noticed some strange behavior after the upgrade. Intead of a nice smooth increase to 100% for each file, it just seems to jerk all the way to 100% when it is finished (although I think once I have seen one intermediate value quickly). It is now not as nice and smooth as it used to be.

Re: FancyUpload - Swiff meets Ajax

michalc — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:24:35 -0000

After upgrading Flash, although it works, I have noticed some strange behavior (in both Firefox 2 and 3). The progress bar for each upload now just seems to jump all the way to 100% (although sometimes I see one intermediate level), instead of a nice smooth progress bar that I used to see.

Re: FancyUpload - Swiff meets Ajax

michalc — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:58:17 -0000

Ah... I have just upgraded Flash to the most recent version, and it seems to work fine now!

Re: FancyUpload - Swiff meets Ajax

michalc — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:27:40 -0000

(I'm on Linux by the way)

Re: FancyUpload - Swiff meets Ajax

michalc — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:20:13 -0000

Hi,

Thanks for making such a great piece of code by the way!... I am about to include it in a site I'm working on. However...

I can't get the demo to work on Firefox 3. The upload gets to 100% (usually), but it doesn't ever give the "uploaded an image" message, with the size of the image, which does appear in Firefox 2. Any suggestions on how to get this to work?

Michal