<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of michaeljpastor</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/michaeljpastor/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/michaeljpastor/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:02:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The FPhone</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2007/08/the-fphone/',%201117L)#comment-1117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about a MID with a headset?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you want only WiFi as the network transport, or telco data protocols like GPRS?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/MID" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/MID"&gt;http://webseitz.fluxent.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:43:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Boston is Bloggiest</title><link>(u'http://blog.outside.in/2007/08/20/why-boston-is-bloggiest/',%201353521L)#comment-1353521</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about giving the 2 "raw" numbers for each city?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:26:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Changing Publishing Landscape &amp;#8211; Introducing Wrox Blox</title><link>(u'http://ckwebb.com/publishing/the-changing-publishing-landscape-introducing-wrox-blox/',%2014361286L)#comment-14361286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's a great idea.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those particular first titles don't interest me much, though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And, depending on the layout requirements, I think you should consider providing HTML alongside PDF.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:53:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Techmeme: A Cautionary Tale</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2007/11/techmeme-a-caut/',%2015653L)#comment-15653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find that TailRank does a better job of filtering, but perhaps it filters too much to the people I already read...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:26:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The serverless Internet company</title><link>(u'http://scobleizer.com/2007/11/16/the-serverless-internet-company/',%209693765L)#comment-9693765</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe that SmugMug stores all their image files on S3.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But that doesn't mean&lt;br&gt;* their webservers run on EC2&lt;br&gt;* they don't need some sort of database to generate views from meta-data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clearly they're still running something&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/10/01/dell-md3000-great-das-db-storage" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/10/01/dell-md3000-great-das-db-storage"&gt;http://blogs.smugmug.com/do...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:41:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The serverless Internet company</title><link>(u'http://scobleizer.com/2007/11/16/the-serverless-internet-company/',%209693792L)#comment-9693792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe because Mogulus is focused on live/streaming video, they have less in the way of archives to generate views/lists on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(For a long time the Yahoo directory was driven by static files rather than a db. On the other hand, to *search* that directory, rather than browse its hierarchy, would still require a persistent engine. On the other-other hand, maybe you could generate your index, store it on S3, etc....)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some actual details (I googled but didn't find anything) on Mogulus' infrastructure would take this beyond smoke.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>(u'http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html',%2019542L)#comment-19542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How much value would the rating process add over TailRank's "My Tail" feature, which just reports items linked to by the people you select?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Don't Want To Consume Media That I Can't Interact With</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2007/11/i-dont-want-to/',%2020118L)#comment-20118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At the moment of reading that may be true, but that doesn't mean you don't want more interaction *around* the reading itself. Sharing, looking up confirming/denying opinions/data (even for fictional scenarios), etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Highlighting" features may be key to being able to go back to things you want to take non-reading action on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:36:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Programming less (Scripting News)</title><link>(u'http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/28/programmingLess.html',%2022978L)#comment-22978</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Could you give a really specific example of a data structure change you've made? &lt;br&gt;* the before&lt;br&gt;* the issues&lt;br&gt;* the change/solution&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:11:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What To Say To A Roomful of CTOs</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2008/01/what-to-say-to/',%2069527L)#comment-69527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really sorry I couldn't make it this month to the meeting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:59:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote Of The Day</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2008/01/quote-of-the-da/',%20108873L)#comment-108873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I used to think McCain had principles, but I think he sold them to the Bush administration, just like Colin Powell did.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:05:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Yahoo! Can Get Out Of The Microsoft Bear Hug</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2008/02/how-yahoo-can-g/',%20127109L)#comment-127109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This seems even more pessimistic about exits for startups than your TimesAChangin recent bit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Who's making actual operating revenue? That's sustainable/non-evil (which, according to Umair, would exclude Facebook)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:10:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Yahoo! Can Get Out Of The Microsoft Bear Hug</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2008/02/how-yahoo-can-g/',%20128373L)#comment-128373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, I was also thinking that, rather than pile up cash to spend on acquisitions they do nothing with, maybe Google should keep a lower share of AdSense revenue made on a site, so those sites can make more money and be more viable as independent entities...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2006/10/21/google-adsense-giving-publishers-average-of-78-revenue-share/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2006/10/21/google-adsense-giving-publishers-average-of-78-revenue-share/"&gt;http://www.mydigitallife.in...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:48:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Head Is In The Cloud This Morning</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2008/02/my-head-is-in-t/',%20160713L)#comment-160713</link><description>&lt;p&gt;a related-but-different issue is whether this leads to a near mono-culture in infrastructure, with worrisome implications for macro net resilience&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guidelines for competing with Twitter (Scripting News)</title><link>(u'http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/02/28/guidelinesForCompetingWith.html',%20188425L)#comment-188425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, do you personally use the SMS  features much, in either direction?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't. I wonder what % do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:39:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guidelines for competing with Twitter (Scripting News)</title><link>(u'http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/02/28/guidelinesForCompetingWith.html',%20191256L)#comment-191256</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been thinking that the twitter folks always mention that they get more traffic from their API than from direct access.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder if that's a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or whether eye-candy-apps are creating more load than "real use".&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Maybe Obamaman should name his VP now (Scripting News)</title><link>(u'http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/09/maybeObamamanShouldNameHis.html',%20218814L)#comment-218814</link><description>&lt;p&gt;JimWebb voted for the "Protect America" update to FISA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/z2007-08-08-FisaProtectAmericaSigned" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/z2007-08-08-FisaProtectAmericaSigned"&gt;http://webseitz.fluxent.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:44:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Disruptive Entrepreneur&amp;#8217;s Dilemma</title><link>(u'http://scobleizer.com/2008/03/18/the-disruptive-entrepreneurs-dilemma/',%209702696L)#comment-9702696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I still don't see a compelling need here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andrew identifies&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. places like taxis that don't handle a credit card. This problem is already going away in NYC, I expect it might be easier to solve the problem that way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. situations with high credit card fraud problems. Where are those? Paying for online content (or ASP service like 37signals) could be one, since there's no physical good shipped.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finding the niche audiences with the compelling need seems like the right place to start... (identify multiple options, to find cases with less need to BoilTheOcean).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:51:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Audience Prompter</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2008/03/the-audience-pr/',%20258283L)#comment-258283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What might be a good compromise idea: you (the speaker) get a friend to monitor the backchannel, and send you a msg (tweet? or longer?) only if they have a recommendation based on what they're reading. They're your coach/aggregator.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:26:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Declining Power Of The Firm</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2008/04/the-declining-p/',%20313583L)#comment-313583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that rather than make huge profits which they plow into acquisitions which they can't integrate, the big players like Google should keep a smaller piece of the ad-revenue pie, so that players in their eco-system (hello AppEngine) can build a sustainable model...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:13:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Need A New Path To Liquidity</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2008/04/we-need-a-new-p/',%20320213L)#comment-320213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there are 2 dimensions here which will be increasingly unbundled:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. what governance/ownership model maximizes future profitability (from actual revenues) of a start-up? Does it *need* to be brought into a big player to leverage that parent's user base, revenue stream, etc?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. assuming a future stream of profitability, how can some near-term liquidity be provided to those investing their time and money?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it's going to be hard to answer/change #2 until there are more cases of start-ups staying "independent" while reaching profitability.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even once that happens, the next question becomes whether, as a potential provider of liquidity, you can feel safe about future profitability, esp if your cash can be seen as reducing motivation of the founders... Staying independent raises an exec-succession issue that hasn't been solved either...&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:39:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fred Wilson Dot VC</title><link>(u'http://fredwilson.vc/post/31454252',%20324150L)#comment-324150</link><description>&lt;p&gt;comparing to StumbleUpon might be interesting&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:26:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This is Nuts</title><link>(u'http://www.usv.com/posts/this-is-nuts',%20325395L)#comment-325395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here are some links in chrono order&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jan3'2007 &lt;a href="http://www.harris.com/view_pressrelease.asp?act=lookup&amp;amp;pr_id=2031" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.harris.com/view_pressrelease.asp?act=lookup&amp;amp;pr_id=2031"&gt;http://www.harris.com/view_...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;* picture of handheld &lt;a href="http://www.harris.com/images/fdca.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.harris.com/images/fdca.jpg"&gt;http://www.harris.com/image...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;May14'2007 challenges with handhelds (biometric security, GPS) &lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=292016" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=292016"&gt;http://www.computerworld.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;July15'2007 history; criticism of lack of RiskManagement process &lt;a href="http://www.govexec.com/features/0707-15/0707-15s2.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.govexec.com/features/0707-15/0707-15s2.htm"&gt;http://www.govexec.com/feat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apr03'2008: big failure report &lt;a href="http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9074818&amp;amp;intsrc=hm_list" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9074818&amp;amp;intsrc=hm_list"&gt;http://computerworld.com/ac...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apr09'2008: blaming govt not contractor &lt;a href="http://govexec.com/dailyfed/0408/040908n1.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://govexec.com/dailyfed/0408/040908n1.htm"&gt;http://govexec.com/dailyfed...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:45:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adding Intelligence To Search</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2008/04/adding-intellig/',%20343716L)#comment-343716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's really awesome about this is that it might nudge companies toward actually posting *real* ranges as corrections to the Indeed estimate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:31:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#039;s Gift to NYC - Continuations</title><link>(u'http://continuations.wenger.us/post/32040035',%20353426L)#comment-353426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are many of the NYers early-enough employees to have made big $?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:02:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>