<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for mglenn1975</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/mglenn1975/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/mglenn1975/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:00:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hands-on: Turbo charge your MacBook Pro graphics performance with the Akitio Node eGPU over Thunderbolt 3 [Video]</title><link>https://9to5mac.com/2017/01/18/hands-on-akitio-node-egpu-tubro-charge-apple-2016-macbook-pro-thunderbolt-3-video/#comment-3107986833</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff, did you benchmark against the 15" Radeon Pro 460 or do you only have access to a machine with the integrated GPU?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, what's the deal with having to plug in a USB device to enable hardware acceleration? Is that a bug?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:00:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spy photos all but confirm 2016 MacBook Pro’s OLED touchpad</title><link>http://www.cultofmac.com/430982/spy-photos-all-but-confirm-2016-macbook-pros-oled-touchpad/#comment-2706486692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's probably the interface for the rumoured OLED strip which would stretch out across the top.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 10:48:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Tesla Model S: Automobile Of The Year?</title><link>http://www.fastcoexist.com/1680837/the-tesla-model-s-automobile-of-the-year#comment-698836631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I assume the grill is for air conditioning. If the award was just for outside appearance, I agree, even for all its beauty it's not a new external design. I don't believe however, the award is the prettiest new body. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You have a beautiful, functional sedan that can potentially run on clean electricity which performs at the same level as a BMW M5. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But yeah, it's 600 pounds heavier than a Porsche Panamera as you say. If it performs well, so what? I feel like we're being trolled. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple responds to EPEAT concerns</title><link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2012/07/10/apple-responds-to-epeat-concerns/#comment-584202562</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The reasons why still seems unclear. The problem as many seemed to point out was that the new MacBook Pro line would not meet EPEAT standards due to method by which the parts are glued together thereby making them difficult to recycle.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is this not the issue and merely a co-incidence or is still the issue and Apple is trying to re-frame it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jim, have you tried contacting Apple Canada to see how this affects their recycling program? They seem to imply that the provincial third party programs can recycle the equipment but I wonder if they can with the new machines?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:16:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You CAN Be Too Thin: Why Design For Disassembly Is So Important, And Why Apple's New Computers Really Do Suck</title><link>http://www.treehugger.com/gadgets/you-can-be-too-thin-why-design-disassembly-so-important-and-why-apples-new-computers-really-do-suck.html#comment-582725655</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lloyd, did you contact Apple to see if these still meet with their recycling guidelines or that of its partners? I agree it could be a problem but perhaps they have a way of separating the parts more easily that some believe?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/ca/recycling/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.apple.com/ca/recycling/"&gt;http://www.apple.com/ca/rec...&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.ontarioelectronicstewardship.ca/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ontarioelectronicstewardship.ca/"&gt;http://www.ontarioelectroni...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 22:04:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wind Turbine Makes 1,000 Liters of Clean Water a Day in the Desert : TreeHugger</title><link>http://www.treehugger.com/wind-technology/wind-turbine-makes-clean-water-desert.html#comment-499993116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where have I seen this before? &lt;a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Moisture_vaporator" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Moisture_vaporator"&gt;http://starwars.wikia.com/w...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:41:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toronto's New Subway Trains Are A Different Kind of Ride : TreeHugger</title><link>http://www.treehugger.com/public-transportation/torontos-new-subway-trains-are-different-kind-ride.html#comment-424470972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Even the most recent of the last generation did not have centre poles but instead the centre hand grab rail similar to the current trains. The problem with these news ones is they have less than 50% of the train with the centre hand rail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The new design has no central rail below the now larger space occupied by heating and cooling systems at each end of the train. The rail in the centre is also shortened by the security cameras on either end of it needing a gap for it's field of view.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally, there are no overhead rails near the doors, only lower grab handles. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;During rush hour periods, it makes the train harder to ride as you are frequently in a location with nowhere to hold on to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:15:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Cyclists Blow Through Stop Signs: It's Physics : TreeHugger</title><link>http://www.treehugger.com/bikes/why-cyclists-blow-through-stop-signs-its-physics.html#comment-366844406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the cost of replacing stop signs with cameras and maintaining them would be cost-prohibitive. Ideally a roundabout would be better but I don't know if a traditional intersection has the room and frankly most North American drivers don't know the rules for a roundabout. On Broadway near Bayview there are two roundabouts and probably due to cluelessness one of them actually had stop-signs added.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lloyd is dead on. The point here is safety and to encourage more people to ride. It's better for congestion and better for the environment. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would imagine if the law stipulated roads where the speed limit is 40 kph or less it would target only those streets where traffic is limited but in the end laws are only as effective as a rider or driver is cautious. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:50:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://thepracticeofcode.com/post/8681712620</title><link>http://www.practiceofcode.com/post/8681712620#comment-282212129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No it doesn't, but thank you for the data. I now know the ramifications. Much appreciated! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:59:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://thepracticeofcode.com/post/8681712620</title><link>http://www.practiceofcode.com/post/8681712620#comment-281210419</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome. Have a recent 2010 so I'd be very interested.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:35:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battle of the iphauxn killers &amp;#8211; Nokia to rain on RIM&amp;#8217;s storm?</title><link>http://wirelessnorth.ca/2008/12/02/battle-of-the-iphauxn-killers-nokia-to-rain-on-rims-storm/#comment-4145954</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Flash doesn't perform well on my 2.3GHz MacBook Pro, so I would be surprised if full Flash worked at all on a mobile. Flash sites tend to trend towards a large fixed size as well so I don't know if the experience will be able to scale down to mobile. Performance aside, leaving Flash off a smart phone may be a better experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:15:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rogers HSDPA network slowing down?</title><link>http://wirelessnorth.ca/2008/08/14/rogers-hsdpa-network-slowing-down/#comment-1854988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a follow-up the speeds are really varying. At times I'm seeing 1.5-2 Mbps.Probably a combination of network traffic and protocol implementation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:34:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rogers HSDPA network slowing down?</title><link>http://wirelessnorth.ca/2008/08/14/rogers-hsdpa-network-slowing-down/#comment-1480339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Using Speedtest on iPhone, Queen and Spadina, Toronto with full 3G signal, 367 Kb/sec down and 95 Kb/sec up. Switching to WiFi 3159 Kb/sec down and 1829 Kb/sec up. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:11:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>