<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for metacritique</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/metacritique/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/metacritique/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:22:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://alexwhines.tumblr.com/post/833172231</title><link>http://alexwhines.tumblr.com/post/833172231#comment-63291125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"decent?"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:22:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://natface.tumblr.com/post/782006230</title><link>http://natface.tumblr.com/post/782006230#comment-60980838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! Glad you like it. I think we're back in business, at least for now. I'll have another one coming up shortly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://langer.tumblr.com/post/395322611</title><link>http://langer.tumblr.com/post/395322611#comment-34993956</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does D--- stand for Dreadlocks comma Blonde?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:27:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey folks,</title><link>http://metacritique.cc/post/394865087#comment-34891667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;true -- guest contributions have been archived in the sidebar thingy. There was this weird 24-hour period where OPB had suggested they wanted to interview me about the blog on the radio, and I had a lot of inner turmoil about the fact that i hadn't posted in months and that the most recent posts weren't my own writing and didn't really reflect what the project was about, and so i decided to bump the guest contributions to a pseudo-semi-archive without actually deleting them. But then OPB had a scheduling conflict and it didn't end up happening, so, here we are, me being selfish and alone, as usual. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:46:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tumbledore.tumblr.com/post/393276231</title><link>http://tumbledore.tumblr.com/post/393276231#comment-34804529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally on your side. This is ridiculous. Pitchfork seems to have handled it gracefully, though Tumblr's handled it very badly. Have you corresponded with Tumblr staff since the above email?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:41:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alex Whines - Because one post on the the relative frequencies...</title><link>http://alexwhines.tumblr.com/post/316916604#comment-28644348</link><description>&lt;p&gt;oh, i just read it. nevermind.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:53:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alex Whines - Because one post on the the relative frequencies...</title><link>http://alexwhines.tumblr.com/post/316916604#comment-28644017</link><description>&lt;p&gt;is that stick figure facing toward us? if so, you've got left and right mixed up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: matt langer - Avatar is a bad film.
 Not because it lacks any...</title><link>http://langer.tumblr.com/post/301628906#comment-27973352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;don't understand this argument. possible misuse of the phrase "uncanny valley" (as i understand it, the closer the resemblance, the more disturbing the effect?). counterexamples too obvious and plentiful: by your logic, this morning's washington post is more valuable/truer than the odyssey? is this an argument for nonfiction over fiction? is there a place for allegory? are we discarding storytelling whose bases are "not real" or "not believable"? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:35:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Every Day I'm Tumblin'</title><link>http://tumbledore.tumblr.com/post/299051655#comment-27499592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;makes me think i should start printing things with human blood&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:16:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Every Day I&amp;#039;m No Longer Tumblin&amp;#039; The Best Songs of 2009 - Every Day I'm Tumblin'</title><link>http://tumbledore.tumblr.com/post/306726346#comment-27499216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;D.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:15:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A putting place: benfound:

 Yes, this is actually what I look like...</title><link>http://turnlizer.tumblr.com/post/306618816#comment-27490608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you're just jealous&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:56:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sweetness and Light</title><link>http://natface.tumblr.com/post/304854322#comment-27409629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ps, to address the point, how about majestically mediocre? Spectacularly mediocre? An inspiration of mediocrity?  Mediocrity pursued monomaniacally by a director of greater vision, resources, and true talent for the mediocre than the world had ever known? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:42:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sweetness and Light</title><link>http://natface.tumblr.com/post/304854322#comment-27409464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Even better! Thanks crucially for reminding me of Borat. And yes, of course the list needs definition. At the time I was just pulling out the movies that struck me from lists of all the oscar nominees this decade. But I've got the list defined now. It's not going to be of movies per se: it's going to be the top 5 (or 6 or 7 if I think of more) *concepts* in movies this decade. #5, for example, is "male androgyny." Johnny Depp in Pirates, Heath Ledger in Batman, Cate Blanchett in I'm Not There, and so on. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:39:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wait, what. (All of those guys from Half-Baked went on to...)</title><link>http://whydoihaveablog.tumblr.com/post/298167411#comment-27172686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how do you get it where you can reply to a batch all at once?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:58:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: annagrams</title><link>http://annagrams.tumblr.com/post/298203771#comment-27171961</link><description>&lt;p&gt;!!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Miss u&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:12:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A putting place: You guys, I’m plunking.</title><link>http://turnlizer.tumblr.com/post/289606139#comment-27097391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;no "after" picture?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;also that girl's laughter is a death knell&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"so hopefully the doorbell doesn't ring HAHAHA"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:41:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wait, what.</title><link>http://whydoihaveablog.tumblr.com/post/291616168#comment-26738345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why aren't we real-life friends? I have family in Massachusetts (Brookline and Sudbury) and I visit once a year maybe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:53:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Locomotive Hootenanny</title><link>http://locomotivehootenanny.tumblr.com/post/269765031#comment-24856889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;dear person,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i had a brilliant idea involving a moose yesterday, which may or may not have been a turning point determining the next few years of my life and perhaps the decades after that, and i thought of you. moose have power.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:05:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wait, what.</title><link>http://whydoihaveablog.tumblr.com/post/265493774#comment-24477468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and yet you answered no on my survey?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ps: &lt;a href="http://www.nplusonemag.com/vampire-studies" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nplusonemag.com/vampire-studies"&gt;http://www.nplusonemag.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:33:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That Obscure Object</title><link>http://bohemea.tumblr.com/post/265433336#comment-24475202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;glory of glories!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:43:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That Obscure Object</title><link>http://bohemea.tumblr.com/post/265383294#comment-24474687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;facebook photo! &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/ben.lansky" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.facebook.com/ben.lansky"&gt;http://www.facebook.com/ben...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:30:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life is hard. Here is someone.</title><link>http://meaghano.com/post/260890157#comment-24243770</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Um, Mary Shelley published Frankenstein when she was 21&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:51:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: brainland</title><link>http://brainland.tumblr.com/post/249137260#comment-23903393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://whydoihaveablog.tumblr.com/post/254693383/via-christinefriar-ive-watched-this-video" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://whydoihaveablog.tumblr.com/post/254693383/via-christinefriar-ive-watched-this-video"&gt;http://whydoihaveablog.tumb...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:36:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wait, what.</title><link>http://whydoihaveablog.tumblr.com/post/252597277#comment-23775766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;oh my god. possibly better than this picture of my brother (also for tap class): &lt;a href="http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs026.snc1/2651_1066216980603_1381380050_30251867_6708567_n.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs026.snc1/2651_1066216980603_1381380050_30251867_6708567_n.jpg"&gt;http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.ne...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Also, John Is Not My Favorite Beatle</title><link>http://filmosophy.tumblr.com/post/248659675#comment-23486987</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cassius Daniels' Fabulous Attic sounds way too good to be a Wes Anderson movie. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">metacritique</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:29:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>