<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for megancromwell</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/megancromwell/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/megancromwell/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 05:20:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Who’s the bigot: Christians? Or those attacking them?</title><link>/2012/07/26/who%e2%80%99s-the-bigot-christians-or-those-attacking-them/#comment-599486461</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Being gay is not a sin. It's the act. I truly believe there are people whose brains get wired differently  and cannot help whom they are attracted to. It is acting on that attraction that is the sin.  And mostly, it is the breaking of God's law of chastity and virtue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am going to make an analogy here, and y'all don't read anything more into it. Being a pedophile isn't illegal. Being an individual with an aberrant attraction to children isn't illegal. It is the ACTING on that that is morally and legally wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(DISCLIMER: I am not saying homosexuals are child molesters. I am not insinuating anything even remotely close. I just needed an example that is comprehensible in its simplicity)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 05:20:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who’s the bigot: Christians? Or those attacking them?</title><link>/2012/07/26/who%e2%80%99s-the-bigot-christians-or-those-attacking-them/#comment-599479701</link><description>&lt;p&gt; By their fruits...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What fruit has the destruction and disdain for the traditional family and chastity borne? An astronomical number of unwed poverty stricken  single mothers, broken homes, unsupervised amoral children, and rampant abortion and sexually transmitted disease. Yep, those are such good, respectable fruits.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 05:09:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rally to ban word 'retard' in Massachusetts</title><link>http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/local/rally-to-ban-word-retard-in-massachusetts#comment-37524627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a Palin supporter and I thought it was ridiculous when she got all up in a huff over the word. It only has as much power as you give it, and if you choose to get offended over a word, then that is your problem. I want Rahm Emmanuel gone for reasons other than he used the word retarded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Definition of Retard: 1) to cause to move more slowly or operate at a slower rate; "This drug will retard your heart rate." 2) anyone who gets offended over the word retard.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Post 9811</title><link>http://24ahead.com/n/9811#comment-37522510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am the Tea Party Leader and I WILL lead a new kind of representative to Washington!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:29:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rally to ban word 'retard' in Massachusetts</title><link>http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/local/rally-to-ban-word-retard-in-massachusetts#comment-37509968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is ridiculous. You can't criminalize speech like this! You just...Can't. When you ban words, you control language, then you control thought. Retard is a perfectly good word. Flippin morons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you're offended, you choose to be so.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:45:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BLOG - 910 KNEW</title><link>http://talk910.com/pages/blog.html?feed=330296&amp;article=5988487#comment-16390326</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You could catch Mark Levin on KSFO 560 instead of KGO 810 :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:07:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BLOG - 910 KNEW</title><link>http://talk910.com/pages/blog.html?feed=330296&amp;article=5988487#comment-16314687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it hate radio because you disagree, Mr or Ms. Hurrah? &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BLOG - 910 KNEW</title><link>http://talk910.com/pages/blog.html?feed=330296&amp;article=5988487#comment-16314540</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe it was "be careful what you wish for..."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:45:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BLOG - 910 KNEW</title><link>http://talk910.com/pages/blog.html?feed=330296&amp;article=5988487#comment-16314456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you. The explanation just doesn't seem to jive, right? I think they're running scared, and just like when they dropped Glenn Beck and Jerry Doyle before, it's going to bite them in the butt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:43:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BLOG - 910 KNEW</title><link>http://talk910.com/pages/blog.html?feed=330296&amp;article=5988487#comment-16310687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm trying to avoid a knee-jerk reaction here; it seems, however, bad timing to remove Dr. Savage at the same time he's fighting the British to remove his name from the watch list. I dislike the "going in a different direction..." spiel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please clarify: What is this new direction? And the "more local content" sounds eerily like the "Localism Boards" that the White House has been pushing. These are just my first reactions...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From what I hear, however, John &amp;amp; Ken are on top of California issues, which is good; we have to impact California in order to impact the nation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:35:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BLOG - 910 KNEW</title><link>http://talk910.com/pages/blog.html?feed=330296&amp;article=5988487#comment-16310195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Savage can still be heard on AM 650 out of Sacramento from 3-6 PM.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:26:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KNEW-AM Admin</title><link>http://www.910knew.com/admin/ver2/feed_manager2/index.php?ftpage=article_edit.act&amp;aid=5988487#comment-16310013</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm trying to avoid a knee-jerk reaction here; it seems, however, bad timing to remove Dr. Savage at the same time he's fighting the British to remove his name from the watch list. I dislike the "going in a different direction..." spiel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please clarify: What is this new direction? And the "more local content" sounds eerily like the "Localism Boards" that the White House has been pushing. These are just my first reactions...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From what I hear, however, John &amp;amp; Ken are on top of California issues, which is good; we have to impact California in order to impact the nation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">megancromwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:23:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>