<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for mbwatcher</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/mbwatcher/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/mbwatcher/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:44:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What Up in East MB Near $2M?</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/blog/what-up-in-east-mb-near-2m.html#comment-1352460966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aha Bubba, you were right. I needed to make a fix to the first version. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:44:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Voorhees FSBO Gives Up, Hires Up</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/blog/voorhees-fsbo-gives-up-hires-up.html#comment-993086922</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The FSBO in the Sand you're thinking of is probably 3601 Crest. That ran a month and is now listed with an agent. Just cut to $1.949M.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:15:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (3/10)</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/blog/sunday-opens-310.html#comment-825737657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Horses, I agree that's below market but there is the hassle factor of it being short term (6 months then mo-to-mo) which is very likely because they're drafting plans for a remodel/rebuild and then they boot the tenant...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:37:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: East MB En Fuego?</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/blog/east-mb-en-fuego.html#comment-823229045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well stated, Horses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:44:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (2/22-2/23) | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2013/02/weekend-opens-222-223.html#comment-811823657</link><description>&lt;p&gt; MB F/D, send me an email&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (2/9-2/10) | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2013/02/weekend-opens-29-210.html#comment-794636603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;317 27th is looking for backups so they should have done the open, IMHO. 420 36th is "on hold," open house canceled, will come back to market in March. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:05:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Look Who Found Buyers | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2013/02/look-who-found-buyers.html#comment-793710203</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Commenting on commenters is kind of meta, MBNovice, but not necessarily off topic. Ooops, I'm commenting on a comment about commenters. Sorry. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 01:36:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spring Rush Starts Out Pricey | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2013/02/spring-rush-starts-out-pricey.html#comment-792474006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bubba, I am as shocked as you are re: 3309 Pacific, working on a post with reference to its longer history.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:53:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spring Rush Starts Out Pricey | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2013/02/spring-rush-starts-out-pricey.html#comment-791203363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1633 Nelson: Sold to a developer in '06, offered as a short sale 2011-12, stuck in short sale limbo since Feb. 2012, NODs in '12 and foreclosure sale notice issued Dec. 2012, but I don't see any further resolution to it yet. Temporarily posted as "sold" in Nov. 2012 in error (automatic switch to sold after a certain number of months in escrow).  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:32:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saturday Opens (2/2) | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2013/02/saturday-opens-22.html#comment-788213862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Carey: Seller aspirations? Remember it started as a FSBO, which are frequently quite high-priced. Then dropped $1K when it hit the MLS. Give it time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:16:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2012 Sales &amp; Medians West of Sepulveda | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2013/01/2012-sales-medians-west-of-sepulveda.html#comment-783540597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are some off-market sales that go unreported for peoples' individual reasons. But most sales arranged off market do get reported on the MLS. So your point about demand driving off-market sales is valid. (I arranged 2 last year.) No dispute there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The truly hard point to get at is how many sales weren't reported, and are therefore out of these data sets? You can have your 4x greater demand without 4x greater unreported sales... that's my point in saying, simply "we don't know" if unreported off-market sales would have changed the 2012 data.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:52:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2012 Sales &amp; Medians West of Sepulveda | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2013/01/2012-sales-medians-west-of-sepulveda.html#comment-782779410</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Horses, this is a question that can only be answered with data. Do you have the data? Because I don't.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And to be clear, the point is: Was there an unusually large % of _unreported_ off-market sales? If yes, then the resulting (interesting) question is: Would data from those sales have skewed the median price and/or sales totals significantly?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Frankly this requires a deep-dive into data that is probably not worthwhile for anyone, though it would be fun to know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:43:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Year's Quitters | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2012/09/the-years-quitters.html#comment-770718817</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too much for too little? Great location with potential, even in the current house, but you'd really like to see the views featured better in a modern house.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 02:05:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (1/12-1/13) | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2013/01/weekend-opens-112-113.html#comment-765540885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, a much more original-looking house at the corner of 1st/Morningside shares the lot with 332 1st Place, though the structures are separate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 23:03:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (1/12-1/13) | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2013/01/weekend-opens-112-113.html#comment-765079892</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Any TH or condo has shared land and rules associated with the land and use of the property. TH or condo are legally the same, though "condo" for most people connotes a larger building; TH is an informal term. Standalone/ detached TH distinguishes it from attached units with shared walls, but any joint rules still apply. SFRs include the free use of the land underneath without duty/ restriction from any other property. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:25:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Listing of 2013 Has a Deal | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2013/01/first-listing-of-2013-has-deal.html#comment-763894890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep Horses, I was wondering about Alma. I'll see it today and get the story. I guessed they meant to do some kind of remodel and found they couldn't pull it all together. TBD. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:32:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let the Market Decide | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2012/12/let-market-decide.html#comment-730744336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;28th has a tenant problem of some nature, sounds like BS to me but it is taking time to resolve.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let the Market Decide | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2012/12/let-market-decide.html#comment-728690247</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Add to this mix today's closing at 1536 21st, a polished but original "Roth" built home with a very odd feature of garage access to the master. Bid up from $1.199m start to $1.300m close.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:35:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick 23% Markup Fails | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2012/11/quick-23-markup-fails.html#comment-727181272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Watch out – rumor is this one will actually close for a $200k markup, +8% over April, +$60k or so net to seller after costs of sale. And Novice, not sure how to answer your q but will see if I can find something.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:39:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mortgage Tax Credit in the Crosshairs? | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2012/11/mortgage-tax-credit-in-crosshairs.html#comment-723228741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Point there was that you could see a shock at first until prices adjust. In time, yes, you'd see prices down and "affordability" (which factors in price, rates and deductions) balancing out again. It's touchy to calculate the impact of subidies like this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:27:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick 23% Markup Fails | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2012/11/quick-23-markup-fails.html#comment-721737364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When it hit the market 3 months after selling in April, it would have been a sales comp for itself, negating the +$600k markup in asking. It didn't seem undervalued in April. But we'll see now since we're almost 8 months removed from the last trade. 23%?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:59:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 'F' Word: Flippers | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2012/11/the-f-word-flippers.html#comment-720305864</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Buyers take note: Make sure to see if any flipper's work was done with permits. The building report you get while in escrow will show the extent of remodeling that was, or wasn't, permitted. Watch out for a partially permitted remodel – to save pennies on permit fees, they may have limited the work they subjected to inspection. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:32:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: East MB Auction Wrapup | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2012/11/east-mb-auction-wrapup.html#comment-709106462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They've changed the price on the active listing for 1761 Voorhees to $1,386,500. That's the "overbid" amount required in court in 60 days. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:23:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marginal Properties, Quick Deals | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2012/11/marginal-properties-quick-deals.html#comment-704315770</link><description>&lt;p&gt; 892 DOM!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:59:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tale of An Off-Market Sale | Manhattan Beach Confidential</title><link>http://www.mbconfidential.com/2012/11/tale-of-off-market-sale.html#comment-702016288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gato, there definitely are a few worth looking at, including one of the new construx which later posted in the mid-2.5s over on 30th St. I will try to be systematic about pulling out some sales for the Trees, off-mkt., for an upcoming post. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MBwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:00:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>