<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for mattgranfield</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/mattgranfield/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/mattgranfield/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:46:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;talking about this&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://davidgillespie.com/facebooks-talking-about-this/#comment-380911772</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, that makes perfect sense - and yep, there's going to be a maximum(ish) number of fans who will like a brand on Facebook, but it's always been about engagement. I don't think there's ever been a brand that would prefer 100 fans and 100 engaged people over 100,000 fans and 90 engaged people!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:46:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Economic Hitmen &amp;#8211; How it is done</title><link>http://davidgillespie.com/the-economic-hitmen-how-it-is-done/#comment-314644472</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 22:25:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://rachelhills.tumblr.com/post/10256402924</title><link>http://rachelhills.tumblr.com/post/10256402924#comment-312164461</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome cover! I'll have to get me a copy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:39:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Funny because it&amp;#8217;s true.</title><link>http://davidgillespie.com/funny-because-its-true/#comment-304599006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This lol'ed me. Hard.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:26:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The new data capture - Emotional DNA Data</title><link>http://adspace-pioneers.blogspot.com/2011/09/new-data-capture-emotional-dna-data.html#comment-304597735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And wouldn't it be great if a brand could figure out your happy place and send you a return train ticket there! Some people might find that scary, but to be honest, I'm really looking forward to mapping my life this way, I'm guessing it'll happen with a smartphone-like device that also processes transactions. I wrote a piece last year about the emotional attachment to transactions (&lt;a href="http://www.mattgranfield.com/2010/09/the-emotion-of-tax-returns/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mattgranfield.com/2010/09/the-emotion-of-tax-returns/)"&gt;http://www.mattgranfield.co...&lt;/a&gt; which you commented on somewhere or other, I really can't wait to see that actually mapped out, you know?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:23:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This bird had flown</title><link>http://davidgillespie.com/this-bird-had-flown/#comment-302607949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah sorry, didn't realise the comment had already been posted&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:26:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This bird had flown</title><link>http://davidgillespie.com/this-bird-had-flown/#comment-302607821</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't tell me you're writing fiction, my friend?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:26:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.davidgillespie.com/post/7206075600</title><link>http://www.davidgillespie.com/post/7206075600#comment-241554693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're in New York!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:27:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The myth of the City of Angels</title><link>http://www.davidgillespie.com/post/4163885384#comment-233904894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd be lying if I said this wasn't some of the best writing about a city I've ever read.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:20:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.davidgillespie.com/post/3837716823</title><link>http://www.davidgillespie.com/post/3837716823#comment-233902446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You didn't talk about his voice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:14:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://rachelhills.tumblr.com/post/2963726350</title><link>http://rachelhills.tumblr.com/post/2963726350#comment-135619156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love the chart! I work for free for two reasons:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Because it's about something I passionately believe in, in which case I want the widest audience possible and I don't mind not getting paid.&lt;br&gt;- Because it's good self-promotion with a tangible benefit (eg. I work in marketing so I sometimes write pieces for Marketing Magazine as an expert, which will lead to more business, but as soon as they want me write something which isn't self-promo, it's wallet out)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That aside, I don't think you can start out with high goals of writing for a grand masthead without slaving away for those little indie publications you talk of.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:27:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The sorrows and joys of being a misfit</title><link>http://rachelhills.tumblr.com/post/2846728155#comment-134264390</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really like this Rachel, but I'd take the argument further. Bullying breeds empathy, but it also creates a unique sense of cultural perspective which forces victims to rebel against the perception of normal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the closer a person’s experiences lay to the cultural centre of gravity, the harder it is for them to make good art.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 06:45:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.davidgillespie.com/post/2380272690</title><link>http://www.davidgillespie.com/post/2380272690#comment-114956110</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gorgeous shot!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:05:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diamonds aren&amp;#8217;t forever: the marriage question</title><link>http://rachelhills.tumblr.com/post/1594173416#comment-100173253</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd never thought about not getting married as a protest against those who aren't legally able to. Maybe someone should organise a giant 'un-wedding', where straight couples who want to get married invite everyone along but then don't tie the knot in protest :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 21:29:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R U OK? I'm not!</title><link>http://www.jonathancrossfield.com/blog/2010/10/r-u-ok.html#comment-85752968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So Jonathan, what would you have done differently? Would you have used social media at all?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:56:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R U OK? I'm not!</title><link>http://www.jonathancrossfield.com/blog/2010/10/r-u-ok.html#comment-85751382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jonathan, I was one of the people who joked about RUOK day - I actually had no idea who was behind it and thought it was just some random meme. If I'd bothered to investigate further I could have found out, but since there's a new meme every other day I had no compelling reason to want to know more. You're right when you say that token gestures like a DM on Twitter to ask if someone is OK aren't the right way to go about seriously enacting change or really 'reaching out' to someone, but this campaign wasn't about that. Read the tips for starting an 'R U OK' conversation on the official website (&lt;a href="http://www.ruokday.com.au/content/how-to-start-a-ruok-conversation.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ruokday.com.au/content/how-to-start-a-ruok-conversation.aspx"&gt;http://www.ruokday.com.au/content/how-to-start-a-ruok-conversation.aspx&lt;/a&gt;) and you'll see there's no mention of Twitter, or Facebook. It's all about spending time with someone:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Put the invitation out there: "I've got time to talk". Maintain eye contact and sit in a relaxed position - positive body language will help you both feel more comfortable. Often just spending time with the person lets them know you care and can help you understand what they're going through..."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The video by Hugh Jackman wasn't talking about social media either. I don't think you can chastise the campaign because they chose to use Twitter as one awareness channel. I agree with the points you made, but I think you've missed others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All that aside, even though I didn't know who was behind the meme I still got in touch with a couple of people I thought might be struggling, asked if they were OK and made a time to catch up with them next time I'm in their city. I probably would have done that anyway, but RUOK Day was a nice reminder.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matt&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:41:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CHAT ROULETTE : New Social Media Marketing Landscape for Brands?</title><link>http://adspace-pioneers.blogspot.com/2010/03/chat-roulette-new-social-media.html#comment-40275455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm with you - I think ChatRoulette makes brands cool by association, the effectiveness is dubious though. Bit like Second Life really (&lt;a href="http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/bigpond-pulls-plug-on-second-life-20091117-ijq2.html)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/bigpond-pulls-plug-on-second-life-20091117-ijq2.html)"&gt;http://www.smh.com.au/techn...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:01:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to sell 4.2 million burgers &amp;#8211; a McDonald&amp;#8217;s case study</title><link>http://www.markpollard.net/how-to-sell-4-2-million-burgers-a-mcdonalds-case-study/#comment-16171570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Holy cow, you're not exactly a man of few words Mark! Good luck in the awards!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 02:16:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital Bowerbird</title><link>http://www.lanipauli.com/post/182440681#comment-16143951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tee-hee, you're too kind! See you Friday!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:03:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 top Australian blog lists</title><link>http://www.digitaltip.com.au/7-top-australian-blog-lists#comment-13965047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tip! You left out my 'Complete List of Australian Marketing Interwebs Bloggers; Sorted by Region' &lt;a href="http://www.dpdialogue.com.au/zakazukhazoo/the-complete-list-of-australian-marketing-interwebs-bloggers-sorted-by-region/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.dpdialogue.com.au/zakazukhazoo/the-complete-list-of-australian-marketing-interwebs-bloggers-sorted-by-region/"&gt;http://www.dpdialogue.com.a...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shame on you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 01:48:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8 reasons to use Twitter in promotions</title><link>http://www.digitaltip.com.au/index.php/8-reasons-to-use-twitter-in-promotions/#comment-10503416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was chatting to Kat from One Green Bean the other day about this, it's a great campaign - both client and agency should be proud. I wonder how many people are actually winning jeans though!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Granfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:56:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>