<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for markpack</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/markpack/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/markpack/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 06:38:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 6 innovative new search engines to keep an eye on</title><link>https://searchenginewatch.com/2017/11/29/6-innovative-new-search-engines-to-keep-an-eye-on/#comment-3652444625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for responding. I guess I'm surprised that given the very low, even disturbing, quality of search results GoodGopher provides for some fairly standard searches, there wasn't even any caveat such as "innovative, but currently failing to provide good results" or even "innovative but shows many drawbacks from the approach it is taking".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure how you can judge something as being innovative without also taking into consideration how well or not it is working - innovations that are of interest are ones that achieve something, surely? Otherwise I've got 528 perpetual motion innovations to share...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 06:38:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 innovative new search engines to keep an eye on</title><link>https://searchenginewatch.com/2017/11/29/6-innovative-new-search-engines-to-keep-an-eye-on/#comment-3647293669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rather surprised at the inclusion of GoodGopher: do a search on something like 'Holocaust' and look at the results which come up. Is this really an example of a good, innovative search engine?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 04:35:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Imaginary money: your cash won't be real in the future</title><link>http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/imaginary-money-your-cash-won-t-be-real-in-the-future-1322397#comment-2722979429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's "real" about the money we carry round now? I've got in my pocket a tattered piece of paper with an out of date picture of the Queen of England on it. In what sense is that a "real" piece of value? It's a social and economic construct (and one which works rather well I reckon) but it's not real. It's an artificial signifier of value.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:17:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five most interesting search marketing news stories of the week</title><link>https://searchenginewatch.com/2016/05/27/five-most-interesting-search-marketing-news-stories-of-the-week/#comment-2704315605</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is the margin of error on ComScore's data really so low that a 0.2% change can be reasonably described as a 'rise' or a 'fall' rather than 'statistically unchanged'? I'm sceptical (and writing up every change as being a story even when it's within the margin of error makes is a widespread journalism flaw) but perhaps there's some solid evidence that a 0.2% change really is statistically significant...?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 07:42:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Ad Contrarian: Nothing's Older Than An Ignorant Young Person</title><link>http://adcontrarian.blogspot.com/2016/04/nothings-older-than-ignorant-young.html#comment-2621141261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I have just the PR company for you: &lt;a href="http://www.markpack.org.uk/138519/walking-stick-pr-firm-launched-firm-ageing-country/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.markpack.org.uk/138519/walking-stick-pr-firm-launched-firm-ageing-country/"&gt;http://www.markpack.org.uk/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 04:30:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress file type is not permitted for security reasons</title><link>http://pixert.com/blog/wordpress-file-type-permitted-security-reasons/#comment-2511382419</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just what I was looking for - thanks for providing such clear instructions. Much appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 06:33:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to use Facebook’s new Audience Optimization Targeting</title><link>https://aafd.contentive.com/hrleader/?p=56725#comment-2478556841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now this is curious - when I hover my mouse over the cross-hairs button, I get a different, and clearer, pop up text. For me it says "Narrow the audience..." which (seems to) answer the question about whether using this feature means the post will be seen by people who haven't yet Liked the page.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2016 05:06:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Cooperative Energy has double billed me for electricity'</title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/money-saving-tips/jessicainvestigates/12112541/Cooperative-Energy-has-double-billed-me-for-electricity.html#comment-2473317093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not only Co-op Energy's communications that are flawed. Their move to a new IT system was badly botched and even worse managed, with Co-op directors repeatedly failing to mention sorting out the mess as being a priority for them (details at &lt;a href="http://www.markpack.org.uk/133969/co-operative-energy-review/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.markpack.org.uk/133969/co-operative-energy-review/"&gt;http://www.markpack.org.uk/...&lt;/a&gt; ). No-wonder that the latest Ombudsman figures shows Co-op Energy to be the most complained about utility company in the country.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2016 04:00:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 10 most annoying phrases in Marketing 2015</title><link>http://www.marketingmagazine.co.uk/article/1376635#comment-2412220116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The less you use phrases such as these, the more time you have for opening thought corridors for your clients.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 04:15:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How PR embargoes killed news</title><link>http://www.prweek.com/article/1374745#comment-2385078308</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Press release embargoes were a normal thing well before 2005. Take as an example this book from 1995 - &lt;a href="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DxKtudHV58AC&amp;amp;pg=PA76&amp;amp;dq=press+release+embargo&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=press%20release%20embargo&amp;amp;f=false" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DxKtudHV58AC&amp;amp;pg=PA76&amp;amp;dq=press+release+embargo&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=press%20release%20embargo&amp;amp;f=false"&gt;https://books.google.co.uk/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Far from the idea of embargoes being something new that has recently crept up on people, surely the more accurate account is that they've been around for longer than the web, and if anything what's happening recently is the death of them?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:54:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Ad Contrarian: Same Circus, New Monkeys.</title><link>http://adcontrarian.blogspot.com/2015/08/same-circus-new-monkeys.html#comment-2184327156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One day I'll hear someone say, "The population is getting older, so we must get better at appealing to older people". Perhaps. Possibly. Just maybe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:11:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Billing bungles: is Co-op Energy the new npower?</title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/energy-bills/11661878/Billing-bungles-is-Co-op-Energy-the-new-npower.html#comment-2079629283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And are all the problems really stemming from the March change? My problems started before then and from what they've told me through my various complaints (now with the Ombudsman) they were having other problems before that too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 04:13:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Buzzfeed investigation emails undermine business of &amp;#039;rival&amp;#039; online news provider</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/buzzfeed-investigation-emails-undermine-business-rival-online-news-provider#comment-1993831138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that Buzzfeed has published its investigation, I wonder if that's still your view? It looks a pretty rigorous investigation to me - and just the sort of scrutiny media outlets should subject each other to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:00:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The newspaper preparing for a coup - and Labour is doing nothing to stop them</title><link>https://opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/adam-ramsay/newspaper-preparing-for-coup-and-labour-is-doing-nothing-to-stop-them#comment-1951420335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are two problems with that scenario Adam. First, it's hardly a "newspaper coup" if, as you put it the events "relies on Labour refusing to form a government". How is Labour refusing to do something which then ends up harming then anything other than a case of self-harm by Labour?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second, hanging on as PM to call an election - which you talk about in the piece - still isn't relevant, as the power to call an election doesn't rest with the PM. So why mention it at all?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:43:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The newspaper preparing for a coup - and Labour is doing nothing to stop them</title><link>https://opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/adam-ramsay/newspaper-preparing-for-coup-and-labour-is-doing-nothing-to-stop-them#comment-1949645483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How does "If Cameron can stay even briefly as PM, then he can call a second election" with the Fixed Term Parliaments Act?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cameron can only call a second election if he can put together a two-thirds majority to vote for one (or if he contrives to lose a no confidence vote against himself but then manages somehow to win one against Labour). Neither look at all plausible routes, so I'm left baffled expect perhaps by the reference to "if Cameron can stay even briefly as PM" which makes me wonder if you've forgotten about the rules of fixed term Parliaments and think the PM can still act unilaterally?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Either way, the restrictions of fixed term Parliaments seem to blow a big hole in the chain of possible events that is painted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 16:43:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exclusive: Nick Clegg enlists Basil Fawlty to play Farage in TV debate rehearsals</title><link>http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2015/04/exclusive-nick-clegg-enlists-basil-fawlty-to-play-farage-in-tv-debate-rehearsals/#comment-1939471741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Given his record of doing party political broadcasts for the party over the decades, I'd guess he therefore knows rather more about the party than you if you'd missed that :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 04:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don’t judge a book... Why the Lib Dem manifesto cover belies their green record</title><link>https://friendsoftheearth.uk/blog/don-t-judge-book-why-lib-dem-manifesto-cover-belies-their-green-record#comment-1851645126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really surprised by the comment "I can only judge what has happened, not what might have happened in different circumstances."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Surely judging what might happen under other circumstances is absolutely central to effective campaigning?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You need to judge what the possible different scenarios are and so how best to influence what happens as a result. If you've got those skills, then of course you can apply them to understanding (or judging) the past just as much as to trying to shape the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you want to be even half-decent at campaigning that is... which I'm sure you'll argue is what FoE aims to be!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:52:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The danger of hanging your hat on experimental statistics</title><link>http://blog.shelter.org.uk/2015/01/the-danger-of-hanging-your-hat-on-experimental-statistics/#comment-1828840674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're quite right to caution about how these statistics are interpreted. I wonder though if you didn't apply enough caution to your own interpretation as you talk about the average rent increase, then make a reference to some figures being above average - "And for some people – particularly those in London or for new entrants and people moving home – costs will have increased even more" - but don't similarly talk about other figures necessarily being below average.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or in other words, you say - here's the average, now here are some  outliers one side and let's ignore the outliers the other way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's of course a very common habit in the media to do just that, but I'm surprised in a piece about how to interpret statistics you go for the same lopsided approach?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(On a more subjective point, I think the revised figures still show a big gap between rent changes in real levels overall and most of the rhetoric about rent increases. As your graph shows, there hasn't been a huge different between rent increases and inflation over the last few years, but that's not what you'd guess if you listened to the phrases usually used when people talk about rents.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 08:50:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: De Re Commentari</title><link>http://orderorder.wordpress.com/?p=181666#comment-1740528021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Given what a small proportion of the audience of most blogs read the comments section, doing pretty much anything to it is unlikely to kill it off I'd have thought.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:50:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The lost art of software testing</title><link>http://scripting.com/2014/09/21/theLostArtOfSoftwareTesting.html#comment-1610497847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A big problem with consumer products (and reviews of them) is that those reasonable trade-offs are rarely communicated to the possible purchasers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For example, for tech I use every day I prefer solid and reliable over latest and flashiest. There's no reason every product or version should be like that as lots of people have different views - but it's a real pain that reviews so rarely get into this sort of information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I guess it's easier (exact weight and precise height is far easier and quicker to give than 'is it reliable?') - but easier isn't always best.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:14:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warren Buffett&amp;#8217;s Best Kept Secret to Success: The Art of Reading, Remembering, and Retaining More Books</title><link>https://open.buffer.com/how-to-read-more-and-remember-it-all/#comment-1365982034</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One other tip I'd add - I started writing book reviews for Amazon for most of the books I read, as it's a great way to capture my thoughts on the book and the most useful points whilst they are fresh in my mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Writing them down helps crystalise my thoughts and put them more firmly in my memory (a bit like writing notes in a training session) - plus it means I have the notes readily available for future reference.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 05:10:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warren Buffett&amp;#8217;s Best Kept Secret to Success: The Art of Reading, Remembering, and Retaining More Books</title><link>https://open.buffer.com/how-to-read-more-and-remember-it-all/#comment-1365981074</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely - listening to audio books on my commute has restored my previous voracious reading habits which had got squeezed out by being just too busy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The tricky thing I find is to select books that don't require full concentration all the time, so that I don't miss a key piece of information because I've stopped to concentrate on a train destination indicator board for a few seconds.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 05:08:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Illiberal Democrats</title><link>http://leftfootforward.org/2014/01/the-illiberal-democrats/#comment-1221457232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My own personal experience is that it's far from rare for the media, including the BBC, to get how they describe me wrong, even if I've checked it in advance with the relevant producer. For me it's never caused a serious problem, but it also means I'm not surprised if it has caused a bigger problem for others.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 03:03:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Research built a smart elevator that uses AI to figure out what floor you&amp;#8217;re going to</title><link>http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2014/01/20/microsoft-research-built-smart-elevator-uses-ai-figure-floor-youre-going/#comment-1210423018</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you've got that right. The actual implementation in this case isn't of much use as pushing a button works pretty well for an easy interface. What's significant is that it's the next few baby steps towards technology pulling data about you to predict what you want.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:08:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Haringey send man £147 council tax demand for home he hasn’t owned since 1996</title><link>http://www.hamhighbroadway.co.uk/news/haringey_send_man_147_council_tax_demand_for_home_he_hasn_t_owned_since_1996_1_3187699#comment-1193528172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No wonder Haringey Council is one of the most complained about in the whole country!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pack</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>