<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for markloundy</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/markloundy/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/markloundy/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 20:35:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Village eyed for part of San Jose's El Paseo de Saratoga mall</title><link>https://www.mercurynews.com/?p=6240184#comment-4555081020</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pau did not “take away” Lucky’s. They wanted to leave and Sand Hill let them out of the lease early.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 20:35:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Could You Draw A Dot Within 50 Miles Of Your House?': Why Map Skills Are Important For Severe Weather</title><link>https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2019/04/19/map-skills-severe-weather#comment-4432313551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;“Might” not “may.” This is about literacy, after all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2019 11:35:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A photo editor's plea: Let’s be solution-based instead of an echo chamber</title><link>https://www.poynter.org/news/photo-editors-plea-lets-be-solution-based-instead-echo-chamber#comment-3751821956</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you, Sue. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 10:38:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: These tools will help you find the right images for your stories</title><link>https://www.poynter.org/news/these-tools-will-help-you-find-right-images-your-stories#comment-3749882872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When did Poynter toss professional photographers and picture editors over the gunwales? This is execrable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 01:05:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changes on the way for the look of heraldsun.com website</title><link>http://www.heraldsun.com/opinion/opinioncolumnists/ashley/x929090117/Changes-on-the-way-for-the-look-of-heraldsun-com-website#comment-2210950009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sad that there was nobody on your staff knowledgable enough or assertive enough to tell you, "no, this is not going to work."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:26:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taylor Swift makes concessions on photography contract</title><link>http://www.poynter.org/2015/taylor-swift-makes-concessions-on-photography-contract/359433/#comment-2153842744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They don't credential wires, so that's out. The contract forbids relicensing, so if a publication did that, it would be in violation of the contract. "Getting away" with it is not good way to go through life.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:36:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taylor Swift makes concessions on photography contract</title><link>http://www.poynter.org/2015/taylor-swift-makes-concessions-on-photography-contract/359433/#comment-2152032186</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Commercial use wasn't permitted before. That always required an explicit contract. The problem is that freelancers cannot license their images for editorial use. Future licensing revenues comprise the majority of image income for many shooters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just because the language is better doesn't mean that it's good – or acceptable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:04:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taylor Swift makes concessions on photography contract</title><link>http://www.poynter.org/2015/taylor-swift-makes-concessions-on-photography-contract/359433/#comment-2149721899</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From the above story, it appears that the contract is still a rights grab, but slightly less horrifying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:03:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 First Photos from the History of Photography</title><link>http://petapixel.com/2015/05/23/20-first-photos-from-the-history-of-photography/#comment-2043463512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#17 was actually of much better quality and has since been reconstructed from the original data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/03/12/citizen-science-restoring-the-first-earthrise-image-ever-taken-help-needed-for-the-lunar-orbiter-image-recovery-project/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/03/12/citizen-science-restoring-the-first-earthrise-image-ever-taken-help-needed-for-the-lunar-orbiter-image-recovery-project/"&gt;http://wattsupwiththat.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2015 18:03:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: National Press Photographers Association moving to Grady College</title><link>http://old.poynter.org/news/mediawire/309447/national-press-photographers-association-moving-to-grady-college/#comment-1752140741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What is the NPPA going to do with headquarters building it owns in Durham?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 17:33:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
  
  
Honda, Khanna spar in only 17th Congressional District debate</title><link>http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_26676901/honda-khanna-spar-only-17th-congressional-district-debate#comment-1623883956</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Please train your people to capture audio properly. The candidate audio is nearly unintelligible and, when you turn the volume all the way up to hear it, the pre-roll ad makes your ears bleed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:53:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some news orgs are killing comments, but not just because their commenters are terrible at being humans</title><link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2014/04/some-news-orgs-are-killing-comments-but-not-just-because-their-commenters-are-terrible-at-being-humans/#comment-1347742648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Organizations that eliminate comments  don't understand how they work. Allusions to comment "systems" confirm that ignorance. There is no easy or cheap way to run good engagement. It requires hands-on work by skilled, experienced professionals. It cannot be effectively automated or scaled.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:13:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Denver Post strengthens sponsored content designation on energy section</title><link>http://old.poynter.org/news/mediawire/248290/denver-post-strengthens-sponsored-content-designation-on-energy-section/#comment-1343807006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The fact that they hadn't seen any complaints indicates that the advertorial subterfuge is working as intended.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:23:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Getty Going Free Is Such a Big Deal, Explained in Getty Images</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/03/why-getty-going-free-is-such-a-big-deal-explained-in-getty-images/284264/#comment-1275895500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sean, This is a very old and well established principle in the publishing industry and in publishing law. The term "commercial use" in this context does not mean merely that money changes hands. It refers to the promotion of a separate product. That's how editorial use can sometimes be Fair Use and commercial use is almost never Fair Use. It's also why commercial usage rates are far higher than editorial rates and why model releases are typically not required for editorial use.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 19:18:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Getty Going Free Is Such a Big Deal, Explained in Getty Images</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/03/why-getty-going-free-is-such-a-big-deal-explained-in-getty-images/284264/#comment-1274462506</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is really no confusion about "commercial use" in the publishing industry.  Commercial use is when an image is used with or to promote a separate product. The presence of advertising in an editorial vehicle has no bearing on that at all. Again, this is not a new concept for industry professionals and it is not a gray area.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 23:05:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Insult to injury at PA Turnpike  pile up.</title><link>http://www.examiner.com/article/insult-to-injury-at-pa-turnpike-pile-up#comment-1252659418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alex, Images uploaded to Facebook are not fair game for anyone. Then FB TOS only allow them to be used by Facebook itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:26:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: God Help Me, I Just Watched 8 Versions of A Christmas Carol: Movies | KQED Public Media for Northern CA</title><link>http://www.kqed.org/arts/movies/article.jsp?essid=130172#comment-1162549010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alastair Sim's is, from my view, the definitive performance. I need to put on a sweater just thinking about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:41:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogger vs Journalist</title><link>http://threads2.scripting.com/2013/june/bloggerVsJournalist#comment-946617956</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I understand the desire for a binary-based surroundings. It's a lot easier to deal with things if they are fully "this" or "that." But most of reality consists of slices of continua.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some bloggers are journalists and vice versa. What counts are the specific actions. I don't care if the originator of an important story is my local baker who just happened to be interested in local politics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The whole attempt to qualify the work of somebody based on their needlessly assigned pigeonhole is a distraction from the more important issues raised by the stories written by bloggers/journalists.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:07:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oregonian hopes to &amp;#8216;keep reporter numbers where they are today&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://www.poynter.org/2013/oregonian-hopes-to-keep-reporter-numbers-where-they-are-today/216779/#comment-940735645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does that "90" number include photographers? Editors?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:56:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The future of news, as viewed from 1993: What we got right, and very wrong</title><link>https://www.geekwire.com/2013/digital-future-news-1993/#comment-925670229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;According to some snap research, the cost of tablets is at the low end of the cost range for radios in the 1930s.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_did_a_radio_cost_in_the_1930's" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_did_a_radio_cost_in_the_1930's"&gt;http://wiki.answers.com/Q/H...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:55:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VIDEO: Dwight Howard Loses Free Throw Contest to TJ Simers&amp;#8217; Daughter</title><link>http://www.lakersnation.com/video-dwight-howard-loses-free-throw-contest-to-tj-simers-daughter/2013/06/03/#comment-921617454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm told that this was a completely scripted event. True, or not?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:58:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The future of news, as viewed from 1993: What we got right, and very wrong</title><link>https://www.geekwire.com/2013/digital-future-news-1993/#comment-921583695</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We've got five iPhones, five laptops and an iPad in our 2013 household. The numbers and the functionality were nearly right-on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:40:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: After Failed Attempts at Nuclear Fusion, NIF Shifts Priorities</title><link>http://www.kqed.org//news/story/2013/05/01/120178/after_failed_attempts_at_nuclear_fusion_nif_shifts_priorities?category=bay+area#comment-882707189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is that it? Have they given up on developing fusion at the NIF?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:06:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can a news org publish someone&amp;#8217;s Twitter photo?</title><link>http://old.poynter.org/news/mediawire/203923/can-a-news-org-publish-someones-twitter-photo/#comment-799932494</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ironically, it might not have become Fair Use until she made an issue of it, thereby making the image itself the subject of a news story.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:36:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Giant Coffee and Bagel Find New Home | KQED Public Media for Northern CA</title><link>http://www.kqed.org//news/story/2013/02/08/116011/giant_coffee_and_bagel_find_new_home?category=economy#comment-794204827</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Picture?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markloundy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:34:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>