<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for marklise</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/marklise/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/marklise/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:26:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google: Afraid of looking like a bully?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/09/google-afraid-of-looking-like-a-bully/#comment-316429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed -  Ethan also raises an important question:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Maybe its time to evaluate what the inherent value of Campfire really is, if its so easily duplicated as to cause this latest in a series of stupid blog hand waving?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:26:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Engine: Competitor or knock-off?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/07/google-engine-competitor-or-knock-off/#comment-312349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Comments by Leah Culver (of Pownce) to Robert Scoble after the announcement echo that statement - it's a valid argument.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:18:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Engine: Competitor or knock-off?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/07/google-engine-competitor-or-knock-off/#comment-310912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd agree with it being classified as a knock-off for now, but I think the plan is definitely to compete in the future.  Python is only temporary, and to dismiss the service based on language alone is a bit premature in my opinion.  The interesting part will be what the next language they'll support is, and how soon that comes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:28:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you using Firefox 3? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/03/28/areYouUsingFirefox3.html#comment-279213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Eric @cyprien @shawngrimes, Flock's next release will have FF3 under the hood.  Using Flock 1.3pre - which is FF3 (disclaimer - I work there).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;FF3 is a huge performance improvement over FF2.  Most simple add-ons will work the same in FF3, developers just need to update their install.rdf file.  Some will need rework.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:17:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>