http://disqus.com/by/mariabarrett/enThu, 05 Jul 2012 14:07:25 -0000http://boingboing.net/2012/07/04/medieval-codex-calixtinus-reco.html#comment-577150077<p>Why, after 25 years, did he need to fake a contract to make it look like he had a permanent job? Isn't 25 years a permanent job?</p>mariabarrettThu, 05 Jul 2012 14:07:25 -0000http://ash10.com/2009/06/how-to-re-tweet-properly/#comment-14834692<p>Nope, it's doing it again. Will send it your guide!</p>mariabarrettFri, 14 Aug 2009 10:48:38 -0000http://ash10.com/2009/06/how-to-re-tweet-properly/#comment-14832094<p>TBH it's not doing it now so maybe it was a bug that's been fixed.</p>mariabarrettFri, 14 Aug 2009 09:46:45 -0000http://ash10.com/2009/06/how-to-re-tweet-properly/#comment-14828866<p>I agree entirely BUT not all website RT tools follow the protocol. I recently RTed a tweet on Twitteriffic and was rightly ticked off by it's author (@charlesarthur as it happens) for crediting the remark to him rather than the original tweeter. I had no recollection of editing this out. Next time I retweeted a retweet(!) I was especially carefully and noticed that Twitteriffic had dropped the second name on the list, the tweeter who had made the original comment. I had to manually re-add it. Teaching people to use the protocol is good of course and this guide is helpful and clear, but how do we make sure the Twit clients follow it too? </p>mariabarrettFri, 14 Aug 2009 08:03:31 -0000