<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of mahnve</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/mahnve/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/mahnve/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 04:12:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Document Database Query Language</title><link>(u'http://nosql.mypopescu.com/post/725226065',%2058036879L)#comment-58036879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been thinking along the lines of a common query framework or even a document mapper for a while.&lt;br&gt;It is probably possible in a sense, but having an entirely common interface would leave it somewhat decimated as some features just aren't there for some document stores. &lt;br&gt;It's an interesting idea, but I can't really decide if it's only just that - interesting, but not really practical, usable or desirable.&lt;br&gt;In the end, I would probably prefer a framework specialized towards the database product I'm using rather than one that is riddled with trade-offs for supporting the ones I'm _not_ using.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sven Johansson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:37:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Document Database Query Language</title><link>(u'http://nosql.mypopescu.com/post/725226065',%2058228905L)#comment-58228905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alex,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The benefit would be small, for sure, unless the framework simplifies the data access by aligning it more to how we are used to do CRUD. &lt;br&gt;I wouldn't limit such a framework to only a query language, but also include, or even focus more on, mapping/serialization of objects.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Compared to the JPA effort, I think that the challenge to design a common API/query language for document stores is a different beast entirely. &lt;br&gt;As the relational databases are more aligned to each other, especially with their mostly common query language, they obviously lend themselves better to these kind of abstractions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the different document databases somehow would agree on a common language, that would change the game completely, though. &lt;br&gt;Personally I think the MongoDb folks are on the right track - since the storage format is usually JSON or JSON-like, it makes sense to me to query it using javascript.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But don't get me wrong - I'm not trying to say that this is a fools errand. I'm just thinking out loud.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sven Johansson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:57:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Emacs JS2 Mode Indentation Fix</title><link>(u'http://www.christianrecovery.blogsplat.com/past/2010/10/21/emacs_js2_mode_indentation_fix/',%20798824429L)#comment-798824429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;js2-mode indentation doesn't suck. It's just drunk.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sven Johansson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 04:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>