<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for maggiefox</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/maggiefox/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/maggiefox/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:37:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: #Humblebrags: How to Promote Yourself Without Sounding Like A Jerk</title><link>http://www.careercontessa.com/conversations/how-to-humblebrag//#comment-3525241788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the link love - I posted that four years ago, and it's just as relevant today. Get out there and unapologetically show your awesome!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:37:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Are All The Women In Tech?</title><link>http://www.digitalistmag.com/future-of-work/2016/02/04/where-are-women-in-tech-03974402#comment-2528388290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Helen - thank you very much for your comment, and it's not easy being a pioneer. So great to hear that your daughter is following in your footsteps!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:11:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Social Media Group, Syncapse restructuring cause alarm for social agencies?</title><link>http://www.itbusiness.ca/blog/should-social-media-group-syncapse-restructuring-cause-alarm-for-social-agencies/38847#comment-983407578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Eliza, thanks for your comment. Paid, earned and owned have been part of our vernacular since the beginning (please see &lt;a href="http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/11/02/building-channel-or-why-microsites-are-a-bad-idea/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/11/02/building-channel-or-why-microsites-are-a-bad-idea/"&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt;), and we helped kickstart some of the leading thinking on how this comes together to deliver business value. With regard to your reference to "churn", I'm confused - please provide me with an example of how SMG differed from any other agency in staff turnover. We had a great team that did incredible work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:52:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Social Media Group, Syncapse restructuring cause alarm for social agencies?</title><link>http://www.itbusiness.ca/blog/should-social-media-group-syncapse-restructuring-cause-alarm-for-social-agencies/38847#comment-982528836</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some very thoughtful analysis, and a very interesting read. Laurie has it right in that Syncapse and SMG were two very different organizations that changed direction for very different reasons. My decision to downsize SMG, as noted here, had nothing to do with finances and everything to do with personal and strategic choices. Changing markets (virtually all agencies now have the ability to deliver execution) and the desire to focus on "put[ting] a big smile on the CFO’s face" as Sulemaan suggests, have allowed me to focus on the work I love. Happily, it's also a very different space from a competition perspective; not many folks have seven years' experience consulting on social with some of the biggest brands in the world :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A couple of quick points of clarification: we worked primarily in the US because that's where our initial clients were based (Ford, SAP) and because the budgets and opportunities were generally much larger in that market, especially early on. SMG also never provided web development unless it was part of a social media execution. We were founded as, and remained, a pure-play social media shop.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:28:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BBDO Digital Planning Director Douma Heads to Publicis</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/bbdo-digital-planning-director-douma-heads-to-publicis/51276#comment-952694618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haters gonna hate, especially when they can hide behind anonymous comments. Collin's going to rock it. Congrats to both!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 06:37:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SXSW PanelPicker</title><link>http://panelpicker.sxsw.com/vote/4303#comment-623920121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think we should turn this into a cage match. Who's in? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:45:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Journalists beware: Shell Arctic hoax signals move from subtle spin to activist deception</title><link>http://www.poynter.org/2012/journalists-beware-shell-arctic-hoax-signals-move-from-subtle-spin-to-activist-deception/181706/#comment-592199588</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you're pointing your finger in the wrong direction. This simply means that journalists need to do their homework. Since the average person is not likely to, that sounds to me like an opportunity to justify your existence and provide some value.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:42:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GoInstant to be Acquired by Salesforce.com</title><link>http://www.goinstant.com/goinstant-to-be-acquired-by-salesforce-com/#comment-583325311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Betrayed by Disqus' link preview. DAMN YOU.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:26:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GoInstant to be Acquired by Salesforce.com</title><link>http://www.goinstant.com/goinstant-to-be-acquired-by-salesforce-com/#comment-582736668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Damn. Busted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 22:19:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GoInstant to be Acquired by Salesforce.com</title><link>http://www.goinstant.com/goinstant-to-be-acquired-by-salesforce-com/#comment-582471732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats, Jevon! Super amazing for you and the team! Thought you might like to check out &lt;a href="http://www.runningwithheels.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/roller-skate-clogs.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.runningwithheels.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/roller-skate-clogs.jpg"&gt;this piece&lt;/a&gt; about the acquisition as well: some great analysis!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:50:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Week 2012: Hashtags, Infographics and Momentum, Oh My #SMW12</title><link>http://www.cmswire.com/cms/social-business/social-media-week-2012-hashtags-infographics-and-momentum-oh-my-smw12-014550.php#comment-442275574</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the mention, and that comment spawned a new hashtag, #deadpuppy - used to indicate a social profile that's been abandoned ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:26:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My First Half Marathon</title><link>http://www.pardonthedisruption.com/2011/11/14/my-first-half-marathon/#comment-384742244</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Chip, I'm a little late, but congrats on your finish! Great to see you in Denver, let's hope it's not another four years before we get the chance to hang out!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:49:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FPinfomart partners with Social Media Group to offer full-suite of traditional and social research and consulting services   | Editors | National Post</title><link>http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/10/25/fpinfomart-partners-with-social-media-group-to-offer-full-suite-of-traditional-and-social-research-and-consulting-services/#comment-343733334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jonathan, we are thrilled about this partnership! The ability to offer our clients an end-to-end, holistic view of issues and influencers is truly unique in the market. Looking forward to continuing our great work together!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:39:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Women Dissatisfied Enough?</title><link>http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/nayar/2011/09/are-women-dissatisfied-enough.html#comment-300383923</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting argument. If I can distill it down (please correct me if I'm wrong):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Women have to stop being lazy ("excuses for inability") and/or deciding that they'd rather do something else&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. We need to make more women executives aware of inequality so us "ladies" will take up the charge and force change!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interesting perspective. Has it occurred to you that perhaps what corporate America is selling, many women are simply not interested in buying? Might it be you, not us?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:12:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SXSW 2012 - The State of B2B Social Media</title><link>http://panelpicker.sxsw.com/ideas/view/13319#comment-299264309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for all your kind words - and great question, Eric - if we can make this panel happen, what do you want us to talk about?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:38:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GrowLab &amp;#038; FounderFuel Launch</title><link>http://staging.startupnorth.ca/2011/06/02/growlab-founderfuel-launch/#comment-224732011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a week late to this, but still want to chime in (and thanks for including me in your list, David - I'm in great company!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd actually like to reframe this as a discussion about innovation. For&lt;br&gt; an organization that was established to foster innovation, FounderFuel appears to be remarkably unaware of how important diversity is in that process. This post (&lt;a href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/01/diversity-powers-innovation-economy/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/01/diversity-powers-innovation-economy/)"&gt;http://www.scienceprogress....&lt;/a&gt; from *2008* speaks specifically to the power (and importance of) diversity in innovation:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Economic research on the creative power of groups demonstrates that &lt;br&gt; teams composed of smart people alone may not generate innovative  &lt;br&gt;solutions to technical problems. According to Scott Page, Professor of  &lt;br&gt;Complex Systems, Political Science, and Economics at the University of  &lt;br&gt;Michigan, diversity within those groups leads to a diversity of  &lt;br&gt;problem-solving approaches and drives the power to innovate."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So nevermind "boys vs. girls" - let's talk about who wants to get the best results.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:45:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Market to the &amp;#8220;Untouchables&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.blogworld.com/2011/05/26/how-to-market-to-the-untouchables/#comment-216118789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the great post, glad you enjoyed the session!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:34:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boutique Analyst Firm Altimeter Adds Industry Leader Brian Solis to Its Team</title><link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/boutique_analyst_firm_altimeter_adds_industry_lead.php#comment-163261155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations to you all - a stellar team of thinkers. Well done!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:03:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: letter.ly</title><link>http://letter.ly/internetmarketing/best-internet-marketing-posts-and-newest-marketing-trends-for-january-2011#comment-139136482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like this idea, I really do. I paid $10 a month to prove it. BUT - there are too many links. I need it to be a shorter list of awesome rather than a big list of okay. I simply don't have the time to read through it all. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trend: How Social Media Boutiques are Winning Deals Over Traditional Digital Agencies</title><link>http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2010/12/21/trend-how-social-media-boutiques-are-winning-deals-over-traditional-digital-agencies/#comment-116631359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IMHO the ones with the most to risk in this new disruption are the digital agencies. Social strategies are quickly becoming digital strategies, and they touch all parts of the org, not just marcomm.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't tell you how many RFPs we've responded to/won this year from large global orgs who have been dabbling but are now getting serious. They're *all* looking for specialist agencies. Your research perfectly dovetails with our experience in the market.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All I want for Christmas is an @armano infographic... ;-) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:51:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Changes the Default New User Avatar [PIC]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/09/14/twitter-egg-avatar/#comment-87338674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unlimited Vacation: It&amp;#8217;s the Thought that Counts</title><link>http://erinbury.com/post/1313347492#comment-87049157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Erin - thanks so much for the post, and yes, I do believe that ALL employees should take a minimum number of days (ask anyone who works with me - I have been know to literally badger people to tell me when they are taking time off... I'm looking at you, Jordan.) I  my personal experience, if I don't get an extra day or two every 8 weeks or so, I start getting burned out and "working stupid". Time off is essential to mental health and productivity. Sadly, there's no way to literally force someone to take a vacation!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:38:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: XX Tech Founders</title><link>http://staging.startupnorth.ca/2010/09/30/xx-tech-founders/#comment-83463824</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks so much for including me in this great list - and I love, love, LOVE that it's as long as it is. Let's make it longer!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 10:30:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Write a Social Media Proposal</title><link>https://www.ignitesocialmedia.com/social-media-strategy/how-to-write-social-media-proposal/#comment-70808621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Lisa, thanks for the link. And we agree that the RFP template we developed earlier this year is absolutely being used incorrectly. Instead of defining needs, procurement departments are including the whole thing verbatim. We've been invited to respond to a few of those (the ultimate revenge) and are planning to make revisions that help guide people a little better in, as you've said quite well, "being reasonable"!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great post!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:44:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media RFP Template</title><link>http://sociablebusiness.com/blog/2010/05/26/social-media-rfp-template/#comment-52597263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Dennis - so glad you found our template a useful platform to build on. A reminder that the SMG template is available in editable format, online, for free &lt;a href="http://www.socialmediagroup.com/social-media-rfp-template/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.socialmediagroup.com/social-media-rfp-template/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggiefox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 06:38:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>