<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for luomat</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/luomat/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/luomat/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:58:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: i am your canadian boyfriend</title><link>http://atsween.tumblr.com/post/87987923#comment-7363792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You really ought to send this URL to @AmyJane since she was (IIRC) the first one to make the saying popular, at least the one who added the phrase to my vocabulary on the twitter almost a year ago: &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/AmyJane/status/779396127" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://twitter.com/AmyJane/status/779396127"&gt;https://twitter.com/AmyJane...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:58:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: i have a blog. what did you ever do? - whenever i’m feeling down, i just watch this...</title><link>http://srslainey.com/post/87594727#comment-7318400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the most awesomely adorable thing ever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:45:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Everything Buckets</title><link>http://log.scifihifi.com/post/76989703#comment-6136289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;His argument was simply overly broad.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DevonThink is great, but it will work better if I put all of my "Project X" things in one database and all of my "Project Y" things in another.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yojimbo is great for storing snippets of information, but stuff enough PDFs in there and kiss syncing goodbye.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Spotlight is great, but I find it works a lot faster if I have put some of my stuff into specific folders that I can then search in, and only if I fail to find it then do I make a broader search.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And of course, Spotlight fails to do a whole lot of pattern matching that would make it more powerful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't throw everything into any bucket.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nor do I want everything just laying around without any organization whatsoever.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Assuming that Alex has some folders inside his Home directory, he agrees.  It's just to what extent.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:52:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web makeover!</title><link>https://blog.dropbox.com/2008/12/web-makeover/#comment-4383397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only thing still missing (IMO) is the ability to checkout Revision on the webpage, vs having to go into the Finder/Explorer/whatever on the desktop.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:38:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A New Faith Coalition</title><link>http://www.sojo.net/blog/godspolitics/?p=3593#comment-3576789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Sarah Palin had been male, John McCain wouldn't have selected her. So you could call that sexist too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Colin Powell called her unqualified. Does that make him sexist?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(It's amazing how fast Powell's reputation sank in the eyes of many Republicans as soon as he went all "Maverick" and broke with his party.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They wouldn't let her be interviewed by the press until they "showed her some deference". Is that sexist?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;McCain eventually wouldn't let her be interviewed by herself. Does that make him sexist? Or was he simply afraid that she would embarrass herself every time she talked to a reporter?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Palin's lack of qualification was seen by all with eyes to see. George Will said it. Newt Ginginch said it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lots of people said it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But the biggest demonstration came from Palin's own mouth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And before you blame it on the "liberal elites" go and watch the clips for yourself and listen to her stumble over words and make total nonsense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch the interview with Charles Gibson were she-who-could-see-Russia-from-her-house didn't know the Bush Doctrine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch her fail to list any newspaper or magazine that she reads, opting instead for "All of 'em!"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch her fail to be able to list any Supreme Court decision other than Roe v Wade.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any of these things, in a male or female candidate, would be seen as lacking for someone worthy to be a heartbeat from the presidency.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To call it sexism is to try to pretend that the emperor had clothes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is there racism in our country? You bet, and Palin et al played on it as much as they could, along with the guilt by association of everyone / anything they could.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The voters rejected it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And so should you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Will you remember the scripture to pray for our elected leader? Or does that only count for Republicans?  I've prayed for George W. Bush despite disagreeing vehemently with his policies and not thinking much of him as a person or a president.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sick and tired of hearing that when Republicans get voted in we need to thank God and when Democrats get voted in we need to pray for our country because it's going down the toilet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:13:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A New Faith Coalition</title><link>http://www.sojo.net/blog/godspolitics/?p=3593#comment-3576640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's what you need to learn:&lt;br&gt;"Born Again Evangelical" is not the same as "Christian".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While all Born Again Evangelicals may call themselves Christian, but not all Christians call themselves Born Again Evangelicals&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While I consider myself to have been "born again" and could name for you a specific date, time, and place, I would not align myself with that group in a poll, because that specific group has aligned itself with politics of exclusion, supported war, and ignores the poor, all of which I see as anti- (as in "against") Christ.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In that same poll that you refer to:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p2" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p2"&gt;http://edition.cnn.com/ELEC...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Catholics who attend weekly services went 50/49 for McCain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Catholics who attend less often went 58/40 for Obama.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Weekly church attenders went 55/43 for McCain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;White Protestant "Not Born Again" went 55/44 for McCain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So the real revelation here is that you only consider Born Agains to be true Christians.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suspect the Pharisees thought they were the only "true believers" in their day too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:01:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A New Faith Coalition</title><link>http://www.sojo.net/blog/godspolitics/?p=3593#comment-3576470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; Many of us view the Election of this evil man as a tragedy on the level of 9-11&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many of us view your comment as unspeakably offensive, potentially racist, and downright nonsense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Does ANYONE really have any doubts that this guy's goal is to&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; dramatically INCREASE the number of abortions?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Approximately EVERYONE BUT YOU has doubts that ANYONE wants to increase the number of abortions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obama said what many of us have known for years: no one is pro-abortion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He'd also like to end the deaths of our soldiers in a war that we never should have gotten into in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You have slandered the man, a fellow Christian, and I pray that God will heal your soul.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For shame. Jesus spoke truth. You speak hatred, fear, and lies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That is a big part of what was rejected with Obama's election. I just hope the party of Karl Rove can rise to the challenge, repent of its evil ways, and stop its divisive politics of "divide and conquer" which are not the politics of Jesus. They are the politics of hate and fear and lies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:49:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Hiatus From Twitter &amp;#8211; Why You Should Join Me</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/my-hiatus-from-twitter-why-you-should-join-me/#comment-1011766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Yesterday I announced I am permanently and officially on hiatus from Twitter."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is it a hiatus, or is it permanent?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Figure that out and maybe I'll read more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:04:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AveryEdison.com</title><link>http://www.averyedison.com/post/24/07/2008/16/49/35/#comment-994099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't mind the DM quoting, as I said the same thing to others in public as well ("SHE STARTED IT!" or at least "SHE MADE ME!"). I had no idea the thing was going to take off like it did.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For me, I sincerely hope that this has done permanent damage to "EPIC FAIL" and "FAIL" because they were so far beyond overuse already.  In fact, one ironic twist to this whole event was that early on, before it had taken off, Merlin Mann wrote:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(quote)&lt;br&gt;We'll never get these guys to quit saying "FAIL." At this point, it's in their DNA. Like steampunk, Cheetos, and crying while masturbating.&lt;br&gt;(endquote)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/hotdogsladies/statuses/866154638" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/hotdogsladies/statuses/866154638"&gt;http://twitter.com/hotdogsl...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Was that my intention at the beginning? Nope. It was just a play on words, something that I thought of in passing and thought would be forgotten nearly instantly (as 99% of Twitterisms are).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But when others started to play with it, I immediately saw the possibilities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I made several attempts (and even I'm not egotistical enough to go find them now) to move beyond the obvious (I think "Brother of the guy who played Batman: ERIC BALE" was one of my personal favorites). What I noticed (since, initially at least, most of them were either @replies to me or people I followed) was that there was a whole lot of "low hanging fruit" that people went to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some people really went at it well, most notably a guy I am a HUGE fan of, Eric Meyer: &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/meyerweb" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/meyerweb"&gt;http://twitter.com/meyerweb&lt;/a&gt; who had some unique and playful entries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have no personal knowledge, but I think that Moltz was being playful, and Gruber was being serious, which is one of the reasons that I enjoy Moltz, and just one of the reasons why I think Gruber needs to lighten the hell up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:13:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thanks for waiting :)</title><link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/42858313#comment-949305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Any chance you could post and MD5 of the original file so we know it hasn't been mucked with if we download it from a different site?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:20:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Remiel: Netflix Says They&amp;#039;re Sorry</title><link>http://remiel.info/post/29927302#comment-290007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OTOH, Blockbuster Online would have hoped that no one noticed, and then denied it, and then raised their prices 7%.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:01:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hit Me On My iPhone</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/hit-me-on-my-iphone.html#comment-94435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd rather have to listen to It's a Small World on 24hr loop.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:37:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hit Me On My iPhone</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/hit-me-on-my-iphone.html#comment-94432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd rather have to listen to It's a Small World on 24hr loop.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:37:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Macworld challenge</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/another-macworld-challenge.html#comment-73670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I'm proud to announce that as of today, Back to My Mac will actually work, and .Mac will no longer be a huge black sucking hole.  Existing customers will be given a free year for each year they have suffered through our horribly blundering so-close-to-being-great idea.  Thank you.  And now, John Mayer will depress the crap out of you."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:08:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Macworld challenge</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/another-macworld-challenge.html#comment-73666</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I'm proud to announce that as of today, Back to My Mac will actually work, and .Mac will no longer be a huge black sucking hole.  Existing customers will be given a free year for each year they have suffered through our horribly blundering so-close-to-being-great idea.  Thank you.  And now, John Mayer will depress the crap out of you.  Then "&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@luomat</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:04:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>