<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for lukecowell</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/lukecowell/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/lukecowell/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:40:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: GiraffeSoft | Welcome to smarter web app development.</title><link>http://giraffesoft.com/blog/2009/02/18/floss-week-is-taggable-tagging-that-isnt-on-drugs.html#comment-12820620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wondered the same thing. Tags belong to taggable, 'Posts' do not also belong to taggable, so you can only see tags for a post, but not posts for a tag&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I made it work, but it's probably inefficient. A named scope with some SQL would probably be a lot faster.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  def self.find_all_by_tag(tag)&lt;br&gt;    &lt;a href="http://Post.all.select" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Post.all.select"&gt;Post.all.select&lt;/a&gt; {|p| p.tag_list.include?(tag)}&lt;br&gt;  end&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lukecowell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:40:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>