<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for louisbclark</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/louisbclark/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/louisbclark/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:44:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Raymond Tallis Takes Out the 'Neurotrash'</title><link>http://chronicle.com/article/Raymond-Tallis-Takes-Out-the/129279/#comment-333935105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hmm, I *thought* Churchland and Dennett needed properly-educated (not fundamentalist) opposition. Not entirely sure Tallis is that opposition...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">louisbclark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:44:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-20127599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ironic. I saw Groove when it first released (c. 2001). back then it didn't appeal to the Enterprise (those on the inside reflected they thought "moms exchanging recipes" would be their paradigmatic user). it cost c. $29.95 and could be used by individuals (effectively) the Groove Server came later and now that MS has it and added it to the top-line version of Office, your perception is accurate: it's a costly Enterprise (captial "E") solution only. perhaps to live out its useful life as a Sharepoint client.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;but still, ironic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">louisbclark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:56:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-20127064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So... how is Wave going to succeed where MS Groove (soon to be "Sharepoint Workspace") failed? one answer: it has a much better chance of becoming ubiquitous and doesn't have the ramp-up. But the notion that people are DYING to collaborate and fail to do so because of technology has not panned out to date&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">louisbclark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:46:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>