<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for lobrien</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/lobrien/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/lobrien/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 15:33:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 30 A-10 Thunderbolt II Jets Take Part In Elephant Walk Exercise At Moody AFB</title><link>https://theaviationist.com/2017/05/23/30-a-10-thunderbolt-ii-jets-take-part-in-elephant-walk-exercise-at-moody-afb/#comment-3322894699</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Please, please, _please_ post video of 30 Warthogs performing a "minimal interval takeoff."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 15:33:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 12 Best Old 97’s Songs :: Music :: Lists :: Paste</title><link>http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2015/10/the-12-best-old-97s-songs.html#comment-2333508123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ironic that "Longer Than You've Been Alive" can't make it on the list since it's recent! But, honestly, "Most Messed Up" might be even stronger an album than "Too Far To Care" : Longer, Wheels Off, Get it On, Wasted, etc. (But, yeah, "Barrier Reef" FTW.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:35:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swift: The joys of cascading lets</title><link>http://ericasadun.com/2015/04/14/swift-the-joys-of-cascading-lets/#comment-1967302193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you'll grow to love it. Scott Wlaschin has started describing this pattern as "railway-oriented programming" (&lt;a href="http://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/posts/recipe-part2/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/posts/recipe-part2/)"&gt;http://fsharpforfunandprofi...&lt;/a&gt; and it can be generalized to apply to many situations. For instance, I am currently using an `Either` variation that allows functions to return "either" a `Success&amp;lt;T&amp;gt;` or a `Failure&amp;lt;U&amp;gt;`  so the `Failure` is parameterized so that it contains a reason (perhaps a string, perhaps an errorcode, etc.). In the same way that you do not have to check every time for nil or errorcode in your code, my code *reads* like it's solely concerned with the `Success` track (what Eric Meijer calls "the happy path"), but in fact, at the end of the expression, if at one point something produced a `Failure`, it's been propagated along perfectly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:00:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - Most Appreciated Rewards at Software Project Completion?</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,e731098c-89b5-4b82-8d7b-14b64a319881.aspx#comment-1002766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Green field" == "Blue sky" : I guess I'd define it as a project that  &lt;br&gt;is unconstrained by legacy choices regarding technologies, techniques,  &lt;br&gt;or codebase.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:52:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - Tag Soup: &lt;strike&gt;Worse than Ugly&lt;/strike&gt; Perfectly Valid</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,ec3f4e38-2a89-4f4b-8824-af5807911491.aspx#comment-977574</link><description>&lt;p&gt;PAC requires good (maybe rare) discipline in maintaining the object  &lt;br&gt;hierarchy. If you are not good at refactoring concerns "up" and "down"  &lt;br&gt;into  higher- and lower-level components, you end up with a great big  &lt;br&gt;monolithic control.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:26:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - Incompetent American Programmers</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,cd4a40f8-0549-4332-83d6-a71eca0d4417.aspx#comment-403834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a powerful story and I regret that the field will lose you. My only issue is your statement that there was an explicit decision by "big players" at a specific point in time (8 years ago). While you're right to mark 2000 as a crucial year in outsourcing, I see the events of 2000-2003 (which is to say, the sudden erosion of freelance programming wages and a general plateau or fall-back in salaries) as being driven by the environment. The dot-com money pipeline had dried up and the Web had made the logistics of remote development much more practical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If by "big players" you mean the invisible hand of capitalism, I suppose I agree with you. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:39:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - Incompetent American Programmers</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,cd4a40f8-0549-4332-83d6-a71eca0d4417.aspx#comment-403728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with all your points. However, I _regret_ that the job of "take a spec and bang out working code" has gone the way of, say, shoe-making, leather-working, and other jobs where global competition has not just been a matter of economics but a loss of quality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:22:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - Incompetent American Programmers</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,cd4a40f8-0549-4332-83d6-a71eca0d4417.aspx#comment-403584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In 26 years of professional programming, 19 years writing and speaking to audiences and corporate clients, and 7 years editing magazines with an aggregate monthly audience of 150,000, I've observed a lot of software developers, a lot of teams, and a lot of systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - The ACM is Using ColdFusion to Deliver the CACM Electronically</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,5c11a026-5a6c-4c51-a65f-b95ba959a1ee.aspx#comment-386221</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's the best laugh I've had in a while.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:14:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - I'm Looking to Hire Freelance Ruby Programmers</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,1d765e54-5007-487b-a689-882d62ae9fd4.aspx#comment-384596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I was referring to India, which is very often treated in discussions as if it's the only country in the world producing lower-cost developers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:30:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - I'm Looking to Hire Freelance Ruby Programmers</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,1d765e54-5007-487b-a689-882d62ae9fd4.aspx#comment-381403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With the dollar imploding and American developers becoming relatively cheaper, I imagine that it's doubly-hard to be a freelancer in Europe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:55:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - 30K application lines + 110K testing lines: Evidence of...?</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,1e1d2066-8a6f-4eb9-aff8-4298736712bc.aspx#comment-347779</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've filtered no comments at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:58:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - Rolled Back To Older Das Blog...</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,50bd025d-3450-480b-a1cc-9ae35debe433.aspx#comment-137250</link><description>&lt;p&gt;test comment made with old das blog&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:58:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - Comments By Disqus... Let Me Know</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,29823864-d6a9-4b04-b040-bf983d925e9d.aspx#comment-121032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a comment by Larry&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:45:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knowing.NET - Comments Still Don't Work: Say Nothing More Substantial Than &amp;quot;You're So Gay!&amp;quot;</title><link>http://www.knowing.net/PermaLink,guid,73d3c807-a945-414f-bd8b-b46e71df4c7c.aspx#comment-120970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a comment, hosted on Disqus&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lobrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:59:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>