<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for llboyd</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/llboyd/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/llboyd/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:40:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Wave crashes on beach of overhype</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/01/google-wave-crashes-on-beach-of-overhype/#comment-18064647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My question is this: did google ask for this much hype and promote it? Or did a wave of nerds like yourself just do what you usually do and get yourself all excited over the next thing that comes out from hot company X? I honestly don't know bc I don't waste my time reading the daily headlines or blogs.  Nonetheless, thanks for your insight.  i'm sure I'll give it a go at some point regardless.  cheers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:40:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Natural Gassssssssss</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/06/natural-gassssssssss/#comment-10940990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;money&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:47:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Natural Gassssssssss</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/06/natural-gassssssssss/#comment-10804390</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and that's why you're the man aiki.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:46:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Natural Gassssssssss</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/06/natural-gassssssssss/#comment-10804347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thx bru&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:46:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Natural Gassssssssss</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/06/natural-gassssssssss/#comment-10804332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good one. thanks Upside.  another one that I should have mentioned, that I myself am long right now is PGH.  Despite it's healthy foreign tax divy, it's pretty moNEY way to play oil/nat gas AND the USD/CAD.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:45:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Worst&amp;#8230;acquisition&amp;#8230;EVER</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/05/worstacquisitionever/#comment-10157246</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you're correct. thanks Terence.  Editing this now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:14:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Biofuel Prayer</title><link>http://gregor.us/policy/the-biofuel-prayer/#comment-9323217</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gregor: great posts as usual.  your article seems to make sense to me but wanted to pass along to my dad as he is in the alternative energy field and has a lot of expertise here.  wanted to share with you his response and get your reaction:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Thanks for asking. I disagree. Could the auto industry or the oil industry ever have become strong or stayed afloat without massive government subsidies. No. And the same is true for many other industries. So, investing tax dollars in biofuels that demand more accountability with regard to the life cycle analysis of GHG emissions....meaning that biofuels have to significantly outperform fossil fuels to be eligible for incentives...........makes sense to me. The energy intensive ethanol plants are already on the ropes. The plants that are not drying their wet distillers grains, are sequestering their CO2 and using it for enhanced oil recovery or some other application and are using milo as an alternative feedstock are producing a pretty green/sustainable fuel and that is what we need to move forward. If we just say ixnay to biofuel no big deal for the next few decades likely. Time for the naysayers to die off. But what happens to those that will have to pay $10/gallon when oil supply is so constrained that our fossil fuel economy is in peril. And do you feel good enriching nations that hate America and fund terrorists? Let's spend our money to fuel the economy in the USA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, long story short is I am somewhere in between. Don't abandon oil and it's huge energy advantage over plant based fuel but let''s invest in biofuels and work towards transitioning."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:17:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Restructuring of Global Oil Demand</title><link>http://gregor.us/oil/the-restructuring-of-global-oil-demand/#comment-8863495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;excellent post as usual Gregor.  nothing to add here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:02:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Second Market Is Emerging</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/04/a-second-market-is-emerging/#comment-8607129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hopefully it'll ultimately provide the IPO market some healthy competition (that it's already getting from foreign markets) and whip the regulators with some reality - scale back on some of the costly oversight.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:13:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the GOOG 411</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/04/the-goog-411/#comment-8268322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this must be added from @firstadopter :&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can $GOOG shareholders re-price employee options now that the stock is up?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://stocktwits.com/u/firstadopter/1535661695" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://stocktwits.com/u/firstadopter/1535661695"&gt;http://stocktwits.com/u/fir...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:37:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the GOOG 411</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/04/the-goog-411/#comment-8267530</link><description>&lt;p&gt;noted! thx Upside&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:13:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Texas</title><link>http://andyswan.com/blog/?p=190#comment-8225215</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, i'm pretty sure i would've moved to austin already if there were more salty water around/near it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:08:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EVERYBODY&amp;#8217;s Model is Wrong&amp;#8230;Some Just MORE than Others</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4005#comment-7613792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;bravo. agree on all points.  we need a LOT LESS gov't at all levels; best thing  they could do is make statement showing full support of the capitalistic enterprise and hand over the reigns - then go radio silent for the foreseeable future.   gov't produces nothing, rather all it does is apportion.  all this does is create one more uncertainty that industry has to worry about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:02:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New York</title><link>http://andyswan.com/blog/?p=180#comment-7547617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;was just reading a bizweek article on wealthiest towns in America.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/03/0317_richest_zips/1.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/03/0317_richest_zips/1.htm"&gt;http://images.businessweek....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SOOO much wealth in NY and Cali; both facing similar problems - ridiculously high % of taxes paid by so few.  they are also  both continually ranked highly as very unfriendly to business for a variety of reasons.  (most coming at the hand of gov't, not surprisingly).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;it'll be interesting to see how the wealth shifts around the US in the coming decades with many Southern and Midwestern states working aggressively to attract new businesses.  ...and then there's that whole cost of living thing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;as a southerner, i'm excited for the future as most of the current wealth in the south is concentrated in old money and while many are well intentioned, it doesn't necessarily flow through the system like it perhaps could.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...only drawback will be having to deal with even more of them damn yankees.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StockTwits users all over it&amp;#8230;again</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/03/stocktwits-users-all-over-itagain/#comment-7381813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;right on bru.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:44:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UK Update: Credit and Oil</title><link>http://gregor.us/oil/uk-update-credit-and-oil/#comment-7350180</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow.  why is my country (US) not buying obscene amounts of oil? how can we be so shortsighted? i guess I'll have to do it myself. thx for this Gregor&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:56:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tax Policy: A Tool for Good or a Weapon of Mass Destruction</title><link>http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698411494/tax-policy-a-tool-for-good-or-a-weapon-of-mass#comment-7274970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;100% agree; and there is no better consumption tax plan out there than the FairTax.  The most researched tax plan ever created.  Would do wonders.  &lt;a href="http://www.fairtax.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.fairtax.org"&gt;www.fairtax.org&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:37:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Makers and diet, with a dash of macroeconomic pontification, please</title><link>http://andyswan.com/blog/?p=153#comment-7141374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ha - great article; also makes me feel better about the amount of time i have spent in the bars myself - all research, all the time&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:50:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rules in stone</title><link>http://andyswan.com/blog/?p=156#comment-7069682</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like that basketball analogy - very good point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;lb&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:48:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StockTwits Brunch Transcript Sat Morn Feb 28, 2009</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/03/stocktwits-brunch-transcript-sat-morn-feb-28-2009/#comment-6914280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;welcome&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:42:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chill Pill&amp;#8230;Deep Breath&amp;#8230;Serenity Now&amp;#8230;FIRE!</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4072#comment-6906640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;+1&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:24:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t trust Robinhood.</title><link>http://andyswan.com/blog/?p=147#comment-6568488</link><description>&lt;p&gt;+1 sir.  couldn't agree more. -- &lt;a href="http://fairtax.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="fairtax.org"&gt;fairtax.org&lt;/a&gt; will take us straight to that world&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:40:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome the New Interns</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/02/welcome-the-new-interns/#comment-6399844</link><description>&lt;p&gt;a-thank-you&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:42:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LindzonPalooza Decides to Open to The Public?</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4050#comment-6383503</link><description>&lt;p&gt;totally in on the cage fight.  MMA FTW&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:38:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome the New Interns</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/02/welcome-the-new-interns/#comment-6381280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thx bru.  i was telling phil and seth how spx jumped right after the announcement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llboyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:14:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>