<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kzdhfkjldsh</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/kzdhfkjldsh/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/kzdhfkjldsh/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:44:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;CatholicGoogle&amp;#8221; has got to be some kind of trademark violation,&amp;nbsp;right?</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/01/03/catholicgoogle-has-got-to-be-some-kind-of-trademark-violation-right/#comment-16187234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Look, if you’re interested in walling off the Internet from a certain set of religiously minded patrons, that’s fine. But you can’t use the name of a company to brand your particular form of Internet censorship. Not only does CatholicGoogle use Google’s name, but they co-opt their distinctive color scheme as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks and Regards&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Register Domains</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:44:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>