<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for komone</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/komone/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/komone/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:17:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bitcoin's Latest Scaling Twist: Support is Building for a UASF</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoins-latest-scaling-twist-support-building-uasf/#comment-3251735319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do believe that UASF has nothing to do with the thing that is Bitcoin, apart, of course, from exposure marketing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:17:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fire the Miners? Radical Ideas Emerge as Bitcoin Fork Talk Escalates</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/fire-the-miners-radical-ideas-emerge-as-bitcoin-fork-talk-escalates/#comment-3218283116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ludicrous headline. Ludicrous article. Sorry folks, you just don't "get" Bitcoin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:40:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sell and Short: Bitcoin Traders Are Preparing for a Possible Fork</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/sell-short-bitcoin-traders-preparing-possible-fork/#comment-3215905994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's a question: Will Bitcoin fork at all for more than a few hours? I suspect not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:41:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Bitcoin Traders Should Know About Technical Analysis</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-traders-know-technical-analysis/#comment-3176391940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see a lot of negative responses in the comments - but I do think you gave a fair and  balanced analysis, and included clear and sensible cautions about how to use this technique when making judgements about future market trends. Personally, I think this is a very good and well-written article.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:54:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Greg Maxwell Breaks Down Blockchain: The 'Uncontrollable Noun'</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-blockstream-greg-maxwell-blockchain-uncontrollable-noun/#comment-3133101618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An alarming lack of vision indeed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 19:39:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Construct 2017: Life After SegWit? Bitcoin's Tech Gridlock Takes the Spotlight</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/construct-2017-life-segwit-bitcoins-tech-gridlock-takes-spotlight/#comment-3131336155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is tiresome. Are you asserting that segwit txns are compatible with existing wallet implementations? If so, you are incorrect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My last response to you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:40:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Construct 2017: Life After SegWit? Bitcoin's Tech Gridlock Takes the Spotlight</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/construct-2017-life-segwit-bitcoins-tech-gridlock-takes-spotlight/#comment-3131258233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is my last reply to you. You appear to conflate the solution to bigger block size with segwit. This is a logical mistake.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:38:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Construct 2017: Life After SegWit? Bitcoin's Tech Gridlock Takes the Spotlight</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/construct-2017-life-segwit-bitcoins-tech-gridlock-takes-spotlight/#comment-3131233738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's trivially obvious that it's required, and I too am tired of discussion about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:18:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Construct 2017: Life After SegWit? Bitcoin's Tech Gridlock Takes the Spotlight</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/construct-2017-life-segwit-bitcoins-tech-gridlock-takes-spotlight/#comment-3131231248</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I took the "bigger blocksize" requirement as obvious. I absolutely do believe this requirement is urgently required as a key to usability. My nodes are all BU.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:16:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Construct 2017: Life After SegWit? Bitcoin's Tech Gridlock Takes the Spotlight</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/construct-2017-life-segwit-bitcoins-tech-gridlock-takes-spotlight/#comment-3131155199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lightning doesn't need segwit to work. It needs certain tx malleability fixes, but there's various approaches. For Lightning to be practical, it also needs a routing solution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please let us not deny the practicalities, or we just spin around alternative facts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:14:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Java Without If - Ashton Kemerling</title><link>http://www.ashtonkemerling.com/blog/2017/01/26/java-without-if/#comment-3124125436</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome. You discovered FP.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW Erlang, Rust&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:43:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hash Functions all the way down</title><link>http://aras-p.info/blog/2016/08/02/Hash-Functions-all-the-way-down/#comment-2819524021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sha256&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:55:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Startup Technical Diligence is a Waste of Time</title><link>http://codingvc.com/why-startup-technical-diligence-is-a-waste-of-time/#comment-2781794444</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with most of your comments. What is missing is that the value proposition must be technically *possible*. Doesn't matter how, and likely doesn't matter who - if it's well designed. What can guarantee ultimate failure is a VP that isn't technically possible to achieve (i.e. is illogical). Technical due diligence is therefore not about capability of the enterprise but about logical consistency.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:21:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: System Under Test: GNU Make</title><link>https://lowlevelbits.org/system-under-test-gnu-make/#comment-2743444916</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True QA people should write tests not just execute them and watch for boolean flags of failure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:54:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
          a simple mind hack that helps beat procrastination
        </title><link>http://shyal.com/blog/a-simple-mind-hack-that-helps-beat-procrastination#comment-2738286178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...until you face the issue that definition of the first step requires a full understanding of the task ahead. This is a conundrum in software applications since if the software existed you would not be writing it. If the aim is not worthwhile, the steps are likely very obvious. If the aim is to "innovate" (which it usually is) then you have to understand the whole thing in order to define the correct first step. My 2c.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:59:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How&amp;nbsp;To Retain User Engagement After Website&amp;nbsp;Redesign</title><link>https://icons8.com/articles/how-we-lost-47-of-our-users-after-a-redesign/#comment-2723086168</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I await your wisdom and insights&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 06:34:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How&amp;nbsp;To Retain User Engagement After Website&amp;nbsp;Redesign</title><link>https://icons8.com/articles/how-we-lost-47-of-our-users-after-a-redesign/#comment-2719662328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your posting was a great read, I appreciated the candour and intent. So often I skip (tldr) many similar but your post has real lessons. Good luck as you move forward!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 19:03:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How&amp;nbsp;To Retain User Engagement After Website&amp;nbsp;Redesign</title><link>https://icons8.com/articles/how-we-lost-47-of-our-users-after-a-redesign/#comment-2719588992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My thoughts (FWIW): &lt;br&gt;1) Three clicks is too many. &lt;br&gt;2) Users are smart - they like clarity but not to be treated like a dumbass&lt;br&gt;3) Graphical whizzery must itself have a meaning or function&lt;br&gt;4) "Coolness" fades real fast - like at the second visit&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 18:07:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My time with Rails is up</title><link>https://solnic.codes/2016/05/22/my-time-with-rails-is-up/#comment-2690121575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And yet you didn't consider Erlang?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 21:14:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bitcoin Price Ends Turbulent Week as Bull Run Fades</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-price-turbulent-bull-run/#comment-2650018055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Then, almost as soon as you say it, it embarassingly racks back up to 455+. Prediction is hard business :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:29:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have Software Developers Given Up?</title><link>http://blog.dantup.com/2016/04/have-software-developers-given-up/#comment-2646397035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see you and some others read through the word "usually". BTW I'd add Postgres to the "cream of the crop".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 19:13:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have Software Developers Given Up?</title><link>http://blog.dantup.com/2016/04/have-software-developers-given-up/#comment-2644502231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Free stuff is usually... well... not as good as stuff you pay for and/or have an SLA for... maybe that's the reason here?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:14:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Functors, Applicatives, and Monads in Plain English</title><link>http://www.russbishop.net/monoids-monads-and-functors#comment-2638234511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a great post!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 22:39:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Secret Shame of Middle-Class Americans</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/05/my-secret-shame/476415/#comment-2632584076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps the most real piece of writing I have seen for quite some time. Bravo!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:41:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deconstructing Typography Best Practices – Why Vertical Rhythm? | Zell Liew's blog about web design and development</title><link>http://zellwk.com/blog/why-vertical-rhythms#comment-2552268170</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes I totally agree with your point about rhythm. It's a fascinating and thought provoking article. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">komone</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:42:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>