<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kode54</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/kode54/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/kode54/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:07:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: foobar2000 components</title><link>https://kode54.net/foobar2000-components/index.php#comment-4443192038</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe they're DSD audio and not Dreamcast audio format? Try foo_input_sacd.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:07:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: foobar2000 components</title><link>https://kode54.net/foobar2000-components/index.php#comment-4411508596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;foo_adpcm's XA parser supports multiple subsongs in a single file, while apparently VGMStream's does not, and only plays the stream identified by the first block of the file.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 20:50:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: foobar2000 components</title><link>https://kode54.net/foobar2000-components/index.php#comment-4410119683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, check if you have VGMStream installed, and make sure foo_adpcm's XA decoder is enabled and listed before VGMStream in the decoder priority, which is a feature that was added to foobar2000 in v1.4.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 20:19:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: foobar2000 components</title><link>https://kode54.net/foobar2000-components/index.php#comment-4405840608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The APEv2 tagger only writes to files that contain exactly one song. It does not support tagging files which contain multiple songs. I used to supply a ripper, but now I do not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 23:18:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: foobar2000 components</title><link>https://kode54.net/foobar2000-components/index.php#comment-4373013857</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you downmixing it properly? I can hear a flute there, but it comes in around 2:16. This file is 6.1 DTS-ES.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;E: Previously, the old decoder would decode it as 5.1.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:34:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Regarding foo_openmpt fork and the new foo_openmpt54</title><link>https://kode54.net/2018/01/regarding-foo_openmpt-fork-and-the-new-foo_openmpt54/#comment-4367509399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Open Preferences, locate foo_openmpt, uninstall it. It does not come packaged with foobar2000, you must have installed it yourself, or gotten upgraded to it from a version of my component that existed prior to the renaming of the fork.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 20:25:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Regarding foo_openmpt fork and the new foo_openmpt54</title><link>https://kode54.net/2018/01/regarding-foo_openmpt-fork-and-the-new-foo_openmpt54/#comment-4367468919</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not built into foobar2000. And it probably never will be. Settings for foo_openmpt are in Advanced Preferences.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you are referring to foobar2000 Mobile, there is no configuration for the module player there. And it's not OpenMPT based anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 19:46:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Regarding foo_openmpt fork and the new foo_openmpt54</title><link>https://kode54.net/2018/01/regarding-foo_openmpt-fork-and-the-new-foo_openmpt54/#comment-4367448185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The default *is* 44100Hz in foo_openmpt54. foo_openmpt (not 54) is not built into foobar2000, either, it's just the one officially supplied by the libopenmpt developers. And as of version 0.5, whenever that arrives, they're discontinuing it in favor of me building my releases, which already have a few more features than their component, some of which were borrowed from the XMPlay plugin. I also try to keep up with their updates, which is why I idle in their IRC channel.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 19:26:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Regarding foo_openmpt fork and the new foo_openmpt54</title><link>https://kode54.net/2018/01/regarding-foo_openmpt-fork-and-the-new-foo_openmpt54/#comment-4366181739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had just assumed that I made the default 44100Hz... I can make that change, but you’ll have to change your setting manually, as I don’t really want to force a reset to default on everyone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 01:02:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: foobar2000 components</title><link>https://kode54.net/foobar2000-components/index.php#comment-4329040128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It only supports these combinations of ROM names:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bitbucket.org/losnoco/foo_midi/src/a6420122f68e8eaf9c497912c6a83fd640a01a51/MT32Player.cpp?at=master&amp;amp;fileviewer=file-view-default#MT32Player.cpp-104" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://bitbucket.org/losnoco/foo_midi/src/a6420122f68e8eaf9c497912c6a83fd640a01a51/MT32Player.cpp?at=master&amp;amp;fileviewer=file-view-default#MT32Player.cpp-104"&gt;https://bitbucket.org/losno...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And these SHA-1 sums are known:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://github.com/munt/munt/blob/aa2a2f25d680bbac0281e50d596f4457b32fab93/mt32emu/src/ROMInfo.cpp#L26" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://github.com/munt/munt/blob/aa2a2f25d680bbac0281e50d596f4457b32fab93/mt32emu/src/ROMInfo.cpp#L26"&gt;https://github.com/munt/mun...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 21:11:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: foobar2000 components</title><link>https://kode54.net/foobar2000-components/index.php#comment-4273588667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for these. The latest version of foo_input_dts can now decode these.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 10:11:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: foobar2000 components</title><link>https://kode54.net/foobar2000-components/index.php#comment-4273588270</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try foo_input_sacd, which is not my component. It handles way more DSD formats. Plus, it decodes DFF compression a lot faster.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 10:11:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: foobar2000 components</title><link>https://kode54.net/foobar2000-components/index.php#comment-4273587513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, you'll have to use different overlays for different font sizes. Maybe look into one of the JS hosts for more flexibility?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 10:11:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Opkode - Blog</title><link>http://opkode.com/blog/slacks-bait-and-switch#comment-3799912135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Coincidentally, IRCCloud just opened beta support for their Slack integration, for paid subscribers only, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:54:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alarm.com Camera Vulnerability Exposed</title><link>https://www.ahmadnassri.com/blog/alarm-com-camera-vulnerability-exposed/#comment-3725052241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Would this have been fixed by a firmware patch yet? I'm just going to have to trust that my browser sessions are secure enough, including that they end those sessions within an hour or so now after logging in. I'm still kind of mad that they aren't using a JavaScript solution to interface HTML5 video controls. Hell, they could even just send encrypted passwords from the browser, and do the decryption in their command and control proxy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:14:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AMD Ryzen 1600X Cinebench</title><link>http://wccftech.com/?p=404701#comment-3166847455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wait a second, doesn't Ryzen *require* Windows 10?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:22:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hancock, MD: Free Caller ID for 2403432678</title><link>http://callername.com/2403432678#comment-2980186972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone from Marriott Hotels, robocalling my Google Voice number.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 20:11:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RedShark News - Thanks to Apple, this is the FCP X 10.3 review I can’t write</title><link>http://www.redsharknews.com/post/item/3896-thanks-to-apple,-this-is-the-fcp-x-10-3-review-i-can%e2%80%99t-write#comment-2980174505</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You won't find any OS version you haven't already elected to receive when it was still available. If he didn't ask for a copy of ElCap when it was available, it won't be in that list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It goes both ways, too. I had versions going back to Lion from back when I was toying with Hackintosh setups, but when I got my first real Mac, a Mac Pro 2013, the list was pruned of all versions prior to the first supported version on that Mac. Then I got buyer's remorse and returned it for a Retina 5K iMac, and then my Purchases list got pruned even further of Mac OS releases, so now the oldest it lists is Yosemite, the base version for this Mac.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 20:01:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Converting a Git repo from tabs to spaces</title><link>https://eev.ee/blog/2016/06/04/converting-a-git-repo-from-tabs-to-spaces/#comment-2863278836</link><description>&lt;p&gt;3 month late reply to this, to point out that I am guilty of having done this for specific reasons: Code and files that are indented with 4 space tabs, but then I want to indent a comment, or indent parts of a function call that I wrapped to multiple lines, and I want them to match up in any editor. So I'll tab indent to the current context depth, then space indent the remaining lines to the correct alignment. Ugly, I know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My current use of mostly Xcode and Vim has left me using spaces instead of tabs in all my code now, though, unless the code I'm working with already uses tabs. I've run into plenty of PHP code that uses tab or space indents, and even enforces indentation on the emitted HTML code, often using lines like:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;echo '(literal newline)(indentation)(HTML code)';&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2016 00:22:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Remix OS 3.0.101 Images Available for VirtualBox and VMware</title><link>https://www.osboxes.org/remix-os-3-0-101-images-available-virtualbox-vmware/#comment-2861658600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where are the Off-The-Air updates?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:37:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lexual's blog</title><link>http://lexual.com/blog/setup-pelican-blog-on-s3/#comment-2839652688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eww, Cloudflare. No thanks. Route 53 is still only $0.50 per zone per month, and the CloudFront service for a small site such as this would be in the pennies per month.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Plus, I have some friends who situate their entire home behind a VPN, and I know from hearing of their experiences that Cloudflare constantly serves known VPN users with bulky and annoying CAPTCHA portals, even when it would have saved bandwidth and processing to just serve up a cached copy of the actual content. And as far as I know, CloudFront only does this sort of blocking if you specifically configure it, and it's total blockage, not CAPTCHA nonsense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 22:21:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lexual's blog</title><link>http://lexual.com/blog/setup-pelican-blog-on-s3/#comment-2839628513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It would definitely cost in the pennies per month, even if you use CloudFront. S3+CF only cost me in the two to six dollars per month because I occasionally serve up multi-gigabyte content to my friends through the service.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 22:01:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lexual's blog</title><link>http://lexual.com/blog/setup-pelican-blog-on-s3/#comment-2839626722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, it would make sense to use CloudFront, although it increases the cost ever so slightly. You also want to remove the --public-acl option from the Makefile, and configure your CloudFront distribution to have private access to your S3 bucket. Then you'll be configuring the DNS records to alias the CloudFront distribution instead of the S3 bucket. ...and I just realized that I'm replying to a three year old comment, on a blog that didn't live far past its inception.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 22:00:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OnePlus 3 vs OnePlus 2 quick look</title><link>https://www.androidauthority.com/oneplus-3-vs-oneplus-2-quick-look-698306/#comment-2731419903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I mean, damn, if a Retina 5K iMac, running at $2500+ can barely drive a slightly bigger than Quad HD display, what hope does a mobile device with a tiny battery have of doing that?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:30:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OnePlus 3 vs OnePlus 2 quick look</title><link>https://www.androidauthority.com/oneplus-3-vs-oneplus-2-quick-look-698306/#comment-2731416801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"The presence of a Full HD screen on a 2016 flagship is a hard pill to swallow" I JUST WANT MY STUPID RECTANGLE TO BE MORE EXPENSIVE&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kode54</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:27:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>