<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for knowstoomuch</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/knowstoomuch/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/knowstoomuch/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:06:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How could this amazing device be improved?</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-could-this-amazing-device-be.html#comment-61316</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  Well, you have interesting strategies for debate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">knowstoomuch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:06:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How could this amazing device be improved?</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-could-this-amazing-device-be.html#comment-61125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To spell things out for you a little clearer, angry boy, my main problem was specifically with satirical comments along the lines of 'giving the people what they want'.  I'm absolutely uninterested in defending Steve's extra-caricular activities.  I don't give a fuck how many zen masters names you know, smarty pants.  Honestly, did you even READ what I was writing about?  You can make fun of Steve's personal activities alllll you want.  Just not what he does and how he does it, cause I doubt you could do it better.  Either you or Daniel.  That is all.  Peace.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">knowstoomuch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:22:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How could this amazing device be improved?</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-could-this-amazing-device-be.html#comment-61118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow.  how trendy.  how quaint.  Daniel (and you apparently) are familiar with the spiritual activities (if you can call that shit spritual activities) of someone like real Steve.  So what? The satire on Steve's spirituality was obviously not what I had a problem with.  Goodness, why are you so full of anger, faddah?  My name's a bit of satire in itself, so be careful getting so snarky before you even know me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">knowstoomuch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:18:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Internet Fame Convert?</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/does-internet-fame-convert/#comment-61007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Easy there, Spalding.  I wasn't replying to your thread if you could take note of that.  I wasn't calling you stupid--it was pointed again at the foolish kid who wrote the other response.  I don't want to embrace American politics unless someone like Ron Paul is running.  If he doesn't make it through the primaries, which he probably won't (cause republicans are almost as stupid as liberals), i'm not voting.  don't assume things buddy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">knowstoomuch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:01:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How could this amazing device be improved?</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-could-this-amazing-device-be.html#comment-60578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My name's not Katie.  And I'm not an Apple employee, I'm just horribly poor.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">knowstoomuch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:57:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Internet Fame Convert?</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/does-internet-fame-convert/#comment-60551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you are stupid.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">knowstoomuch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:44:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Internet Fame Convert?</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/does-internet-fame-convert/#comment-60549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do your research.  He won 10% of the vote at the Iowa caucus.  Beat Guliani.  How bout them apples.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">knowstoomuch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How could this amazing device be improved?</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-could-this-amazing-device-be.html#comment-60539</link><description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">knowstoomuch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:14:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How could this amazing device be improved?</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-could-this-amazing-device-be.html#comment-60538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;that's coming too, be patient.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">knowstoomuch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:12:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How could this amazing device be improved?</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-could-this-amazing-device-be.html#comment-60537</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Damn it.  The stupid registration process for me to post under a 'Disqus' name cost me the post that just took me at least 15 minutes.  God God, Damn it damnit.  It's only cause I'm on a windows, and the 'copy and paste' function is a bit more difficult to get to, so I haven't been regularly using the feature to keep my writing safely stored.  Damn windows.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steve Jobs is too great a god for your silly satire--that is so obviously not backed up with solid research--to entertain me more than annoy me.  You've annoyed me.  You know why?  Who are you, FAKE STEVE?  Some dude actually named Daniel who uses a blog as some sort of pseudo-therapy to deal with his ever-stewing disgust with either real Steve or the apple corporation in general?  Stop being so anti-corporation, and so anti-business for that matter!  Steve's simply being... umm well, a good businessman.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Who wants to make MORE money in the long run even if that means making it take just a LITTLE bit longer for you--or we, I mean--to hold a near-perfect iphone between your fingers.  You know, becoming a good businessman, well--at least, a better businessman, is--in my opinion--Steve's greatest accomplishment since coming up with the mac interface.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because he has learned how to be a better businessman, or get people to be good businessmen for him, or whatever he does, his stock has been on the RISE exponentially.  Take an awesome idea, interject some solid business sense, and you've got dollars and sense, if you pardon my colloquialism.  haha. (adventures in odyssey, anyone nerdy enough to get my allusion?)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You know, poor, under-researched Daniel, Steve wasn't always a good businessman, he used to give shit to the people WHEN they wanted it, and it used to be as much as what they wanted as he could  possibly manage.  Don't believe me?  Well, then, you probably don't believe that Steve flourished--not as much, but his ideas were good enough not to require business sense--before the iPod.  Yep, there was even Macworld before the ipod, you dweeb.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.S. I don't hate you, you just gave me this right to be totally frank via the anomnity of blogging.  Don't make this thing public if you can't handle people attempting to be honest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.P.S. Your desire to satirize Steve Jobs IS kind of hot.  Sure, I wouldn't marry you like that other chick, but she's crazy.  Who wants to marry an under-researched blogger?  Mimic someone whose field and history you know a bit better, Daniel.  Keep blogging, though, you're a great writer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">knowstoomuch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:12:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>