<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of kmanaveeyan</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/kmanaveeyan/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/kmanaveeyan/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:53:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Legal Crackdown Jams Michael Moore&amp;#8217;s Slacker Uprising</title><link>(u'http://www.wired.com/underwire/2008/10/legal-crackdown/',%20125914441L)#comment-125914441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a non U.S resident, I'm increasingly annoyed by artists and companies constantly doing interesting things with their U.S rights, and not allowing anyone else in on the fun - but I think in this case, Michael Moore has been with Miramax, and therefore the Weinstein's for years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The answer is simple. I'll just make sure I never pay money to see anything coming out of the Weinstein company again (&lt;a href="http://www.weinsteinco.com/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.weinsteinco.com/)"&gt;http://www.weinsteinco.com/)&lt;/a&gt; whether that's through piracy, or simply abstaining from their films.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:20:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yay</title><link>(u'https://www.eventmanagerblog.com/yay/',%203063300L)#comment-3063300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Marketing? Marketing?...lol. Seriously, congrats on joining the list, and inspiring me to make sure you don't start catching me!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;abbr&amp;gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;/abbr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;abbr&amp;gt;&lt;em&gt;Dan Thorntons last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewayofthewebnet/~3/408677784/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewayofthewebnet/~3/408677784/"&gt;Getting Shirky on camera&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;/abbr&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:09:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Like to Make Money with Music?</title><link>(u'http://chris.pirillo.com/would-you-like-to-make-money-with-music/',%20167762839L)#comment-167762839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This seems to be the way the music industry is headed, as it allows artists etc to take advantage of the resources record companies traditionally promoted, whilst not having to hope they are the flavour of the month to get signed in the first place - and without essentially have to pay back an advance loan.&lt;br&gt;There are some alternatives out there, like &lt;a href="http://www.slicethepie.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.slicethepie.com"&gt;www.slicethepie.com&lt;/a&gt; so it just means seeing which ones have enough members to get some bands out there to get publicity for the service and have enough members to reach a tipping point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:27:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://venturebeat.com/2008/10/27/survey-shows-web-20-makes-its-way-into-the-work-place/</title><link>(u'http://venturebeat.com/2008/10/27/survey-shows-web-20-makes-its-way-into-the-work-place/',%203324239L)#comment-3324239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whilst I sympathise with the problems of managing large scale IT infrastructures, surely this proves employees will always utilise tools outside the corporate firewall, and therefore, IT management would be far better off if they spent the time and effort necessary to educate users, rather than restrict them?&lt;br&gt;Putting personal use to one side, the other big driver I've seen for using software outside the firewall is because it's far quicker and easier when it's needed to complete an urgent task, than trying to get IT approval and installation - so employees under pressure take what they perceive is the quickest and easiest route.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:27:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media For Small Business: Caminito Argentinean Steakhouse</title><link>(u'http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-for-small-business-caminito-argentinean-steakhouse/',%203324439L)#comment-3324439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A new Chinese takeaway did a great job when it originally opened near me. Not only did it send out a pack including a letter describing why it was good, a menu, a voucher for free beer etc, but every time I ordered from them, I'd get a phone call 2-3 hours later from the shop, asking if the meal was OK...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's the only time I've known it to happen, and it's a great way to generate loyalty for an additional 5 minutes per order. It also means they'd actually know if a driver was slacking, or the food had been sat on etc, rather than anonymously losing a customer who wasn't encouraged to give feedback.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:43:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media For Small Business: Caminito Argentinean Steakhouse</title><link>(u'http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-for-small-business-caminito-argentinean-steakhouse/',%203324835L)#comment-3324835</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No problem - and the only other Chinese I've ever ordered from was one whose delivery driver always chatted to use about our plans for the weekend etc - it turned out he was the owner!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just wish I'd transferred the post I'd written about it to my new domain already to link to - my surprise is pretty obvious.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The big lesson it also reinforced for me is that the idea of personal connections and social promotion should never just be about online marketing - for instance Innocent drinks allow and encourage people to visit their HQ pretty much anytime they like - how many companies would include that alongside their Facebook vanity page?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:13:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: "Become an online expert" and "generate a nice side-income" (in the clouds maybe)</title><link>(u'http://www.blogherald.com/2008/10/27/become-online-expert-generate-side-income/',%20262021482L)#comment-262021482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd love for such as expert to come and update my blogs for me so easily, so I could relax, spend more time with my family, and still get the benefits of exchanging knowledge and building my personal reputation online!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's never an easy way to make lots of money - if there was, we'd all do it, raise the competition, and it would get as hard as anything else...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:15:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Corporates Should View Comment Policies</title><link>(u'http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-corporates-should-view-comment-policies/',%208527147L)#comment-8527147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good post, and as someone who spent 7 years moderating the forums/chat rooms for &lt;a href="http://motorcyclenews.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="motorcyclenews.com"&gt;motorcyclenews.com&lt;/a&gt; amongst others, it's definitely important to set some boundaries if the forum/community is accessible to all ages. A simple swear filter generally catches the most offensive words, for example, and simple reminders work for most people...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But the line on off-topic posts is harder to judge a lot of the time - it's a fine line between keeping things 'on topic' and killing conversations, assuming there's any agreement between the founders and the conversationalists on what 'on topic' constitutes in the first place! For most applications, having an 'on topic' forum, and a 'general' one does a good job of allowing focus, without killing the more general noise a community will want to indulge in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm more worried by the fact Pepsi appears to have imported it's own ToS to apply to the FriendFeed room!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:48:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pepsi Reaches out to Digital People in Analog</title><link>(u'http://www.chrisbrogan.com/pepsi-reaches-out-to-digital-people-in-analog/',%208527136L)#comment-8527136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if it was influenced, in any way, by Coke's recent push to drive loyalty via promotional codes?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:15:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guest Post- Twitter- To Converse or to Broadcast-THAT is the Question</title><link>(u'http://www.chrisbrogan.com/guest-post-twitter-to-converse-or-to-broadcast-that-is-the-question/',%208527202L)#comment-8527202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've actually done side by side tests of Twitter accounts for brands, one automated, and one staffed by a real, live human who attempted to engage in conversations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can probably guess which one was more popular!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:05:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Is The ROI For Social Media?</title><link>(u'http://socialmediaexplorer.com/content-sections/tools-and-tips/what-is-the-roi-for-social-media/',%203340419L)#comment-3340419</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there not a bit of an elephant in the room, in that a business which is participating in conversation is still doing it to grow business and eventually make money - or it's not actually a business?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even open source business models are still business models which in some way aim to reward the originators financially to allow them to do what they do?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And there are quantifiable aspects around human conversations - e.g. the amount of them happening. Then it's down to automated/human interpretation to judge the sentiment and value of each one if that's whats required.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm a big fan of Katie and Avinash, and the quality and value of conversation are definitely the best metrics of engagement - but you still need to figure out where engagement sits for the rest of the business, and how it's integrated into other areas. If it's contributing to natural search results, for example, then without any measurement of other outcomes, the results are all attributed to SEO work, and engagement is disregarded. If it's driving purchase conversions, but not being tracked, then the natural assumption is that traffic from search, or a bigger display ad etc have driven the end result.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's easy, when you've involved in social media every day, to assume that it's just a natural thing that everyone gets should be integral to every part of a business, and that quality of conversation in itself should be accepted as result enough - but that's not going to convince anyone who isn't already a convert...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:02:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Is The ROI For Social Media?</title><link>(u'http://socialmediaexplorer.com/content-sections/tools-and-tips/what-is-the-roi-for-social-media/',%203340698L)#comment-3340698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No problem. As a Community Marketing Manager, tackling the strategy and tactical implementation of engagement across the portfolio of a 'traditional' magazine,radio,TV and internet company, it's obviously a philosophical and practical dilemma I'm pretty familiar with!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think on a philosophical level, it's easier to say what we should be doing, but there's a risk that we never join the dots between the philosophical end game (with some case studies), and the practical reality of most companies - this is the area where the biggest challenge occurs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's a big responsibility for social media specialists to be able to plan the ideal strategy from the social perspective, the old school perspective, and the transitional perspective, and to somehow juggle the three in a way which educates and transforms business and marketing for the better. The good thing is that the very tools and philosophy we all espouse, which is collaboration etc, is actually a huge asset in doing this!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:36:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloggers More Influential Than Friends for Purchase Decisions</title><link>(u'http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/bloggers-more-influential-than-friends-for-purchase-decisions/1894',%203342933L)#comment-3342933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's the artificial separation between offline friends, online friends, and people who I know via their blogs, social networks, microblogging etc? I need to check before I can answer!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:21:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MTV Brings Back Music Videos With MTVMusic.com</title><link>(u'http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/mtv-brings-back-music-videos-with-mtvmusiccom/1896',%203353808L)#comment-3353808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It'd be more amazing if it wasn't for the fact I just get a notice telling me I'm outside of the U.S, therefore the company couldn't be bothered to sort out the copyright legalities yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:57:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the engaging 'brand'</title><link>(u'http://eaonpritchard.blogspot.com/2008/10/engaging-brand.html',%203406364L)#comment-3406364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, and I think a lot of us would have predicted the outcome for levels of interest - I wouldn't be surprised to see him go and do a radio show like Howard Stern's etc...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm a big fan of comedians who were deemed offensive at the time - Lenny Bruce and Bill Hicks spring straight to mind, and while I think it's fine to apologise to the individuals in this case, nothing more than an apology was due.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Especially when the first time the lady at the centre of the controversy was quoted, it was to say she didn't want to say anything until she'd spoken to her agent!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:43:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mark Evans Launches Twitterrati</title><link>(u'http://www.blogherald.com/2008/11/11/mark-evans-launches-twitterati/',%20262060578L)#comment-262060578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like I was ahead of the game when I launched &lt;a href="http://www.140char.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.140char.com"&gt;www.140char.com&lt;/a&gt; back in April!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's cool to see some other people writing about similar topics, although seeing Darren Rowse launch with a large number of followers because of his previous work did make me pause for thought having been building up 140char from scratch!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just hope we don't end up with 100 new blogs all covering the same content, and that everyone in the space can start finding ways to work together to make some interesting and unique content.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:16:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A page full of thank yous for some great people | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>(u'http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/07/a-page-full-of-thank-yous-for-some-great-people/',%203738199L)#comment-3738199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a cool thing to do....nice work! And I'm proud if I helped you in any way...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:21:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shut Up- You&amp;#8217;re Helping the Customer!</title><link>(u'http://www.chrisbrogan.com/shut-up-youre-helping-the-customer/',%208528153L)#comment-8528153</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The lesson from this should be that every company, regardless of whether it has a formal social media marketing campaign or not, needs to have clear guidelines on employees communicating via blogs and social networks etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd suggest somewhere like the BBC guidelines to be a good start.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is just one example from a company which doubtless has 100 other employees chatting happily on Facebook, Myspace, Twitter etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As I recently said in answer to the question 'Should a brand use social media?', it's a pointless question, because your employees and customers already are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:01:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Internet Marketing is Like Driving Supercars</title><link>(u'http://www.chrisg.com/super-cars/',%2046281157L)#comment-46281157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd definitely be interested, bearing in mind I'm a blogger, automotive journalist, and work on marketing for some large automotive magazines and websites!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:22:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guest Comment: Why Music Can&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;Just Be Free&amp;#39;</title><link>(u'http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-guest-comment-why-music-cant-just-be-free/',%2018836434L)#comment-18836434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't there one major point to acknowledge? When there is talk about music becoming free, it isn't suggesting that artists shouldn't be reimbursed for their efforts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's suggesting that the cost of distribution and retail of a physical product containing music is now replaced by the low cost of electronic distribution, and therefore it might make more sense for artists to use free music as a way to build interest and promote themselves - making the money from merchandise, live events and other mechanisms - e.g. Radiohead, Nine Inch Nails etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're also assuming that making something free to obtain means that there won't be different levels of popularity - just because everything is free doesn't mean it's all good. Most website content is free to consume but some sites are a lot more popular than others, due to promotion, recommendation, ranking etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And surely Wikipedia, for example, shows people will participate in creation for reasons other than payment. People do it for recognition, personal branding, because they like sharing, because they want to get one over on big industry etc. I put in time and effort on my personal blogs because they have numerous benefits - none of which is financial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And if the creation of music copyright began 150 years ago - music began a long time earlier! Copyright is a by product of a business model for content creation, not a reason for it's existence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:06:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guest Comment: Why Music Can&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;Just Be Free&amp;#39;</title><link>(u'http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-guest-comment-why-music-cant-just-be-free/',%2018836436L)#comment-18836436</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a bit late for &lt;a href="http://last.fm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="last.fm"&gt;last.fm&lt;/a&gt; (After CBS bought it), but there are plenty of other options out there which are pretty interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's interesting to see EMI aiming to start innovating, rather than leaving it to tech companies like Apple, iLike, &lt;a href="http://Last.fm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Last.fm"&gt;Last.fm&lt;/a&gt; etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:47:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gmail Themes. That&amp;#039;s Totally Ninja.</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/gmail-themes-thats-totally-ninja/',%2071840166L)#comment-71840166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was about to recommend Google Redesigned from GlobexDesigns as well. I've been using it for a couple of months and even had people at work stop as they walked past to ask what it was...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:29:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IT Must Learn to Bend or Business Will Break</title><link>(u'http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_must_learn_to_bend.php',%20110498093L)#comment-110498093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funnily enough, I've just blogged about this from a different perspective, quoting RWW's coverage of the Accenture report on employees using technology that isn't approved by company IT.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When employees and customers are all finding their way around the restrictions, the restrictions need to be removed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obsessing about new news</title><link>(u'http://scobleizer.com/2008/11/23/newnews/',%209711973L)#comment-9711973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember the first time I encountered a feed reader, and I still get a lot of my news that way, but for me, Twitter is probably the main channel (I'm still getting into Friendfeed).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's why I started a blog on microblogging (&lt;a href="http://140char.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="140char.com"&gt;140char.com&lt;/a&gt;), having experienced finding news on Twitter such as Heath Ledger's death, the UK earthquakes, the US and Chinese earthquakes etc before mainstream news channels or my feed list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And it comes filtered by the relevancy of friend recommendation, which is why I've never really used Digg or Techmeme as much as I could have done for news. It's not the wisdom of crowds I'm after - it's the wisdom of my own crowd...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:36:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jameson Does Pandora Right</title><link>(u'http://www.chrisbrogan.com/jameson-does-pandora-right/',%208528890L)#comment-8528890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a longtime Irish whiskey drinker, it's good to see Jamesons doing something which is appropriate for the place it's displayed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just a shame it's on Pandora, and I'm outside the U.S!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>