<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kjbuckley</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/kjbuckley/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/kjbuckley/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:46:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: SOL[I]D - Interface segregation principle</title><link>http://rubyblog.pro/2017/07/solid-interface-segregation-principle#comment-3403176147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, SRP might lead you to ask why a calculator is being asked to handle saving something in the first place!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kjbuckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog question | Scott Adams Blog</title><link>http://blog.dilbert.com/post/122344182276#comment-2097271561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks fine (18px font size) to me in Chrome 43.0.2357.124 (64-bit) on Mac OS X 10.10.3 (14D136).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kjbuckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:43:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I miss about HackDays  ·  Betta Coding</title><link>http://cristianobetta.com/blog/2012/04/29/what-i-miss-about-hackdays-dot-dot-dot/#comment-513595960</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FWIW, yesterday's Ipswich Hack day was great. Very casual, no vendors pushing their products (although Tom had managed to get a few to hand over cash and prizes). Just a bunch of people having fun hacking on whatever they fancied, using whichever APIs they thought looked interesting or useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kjbuckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:40:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guide to Agile Practices</title><link>http://guide.agilealliance.org/guide/refactoring.html#comment-487271583</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"the code modifications corresponding to such entries can be verified to be behaviour-neutral: no new unit tests or functional tests are introduced, for example"&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Functional tests I can understand, but surely some refactorings – &lt;em&gt;extract class&lt;/em&gt;, say – would be expected to introduce new unit tests?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kjbuckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 09:56:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Redirect permanent</title><link>http://blog.jbrains.ca/rescue-legacy-links#comment-94088483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does that mean I have to simplify &lt;a href="http://www.halfarsedagilemanifesto.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.halfarsedagilemanifesto.org/"&gt;http://www.halfarsedagilema...&lt;/a&gt; too now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kjbuckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 04:42:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tom Morris: 2010-04-19</title><link>http://blog.tommorris.org/post/1230912227/microsoft-schools-the-e-book-pretenders#comment-45469410</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Prags &lt;a href="http://pragprog.com/frequently-asked-questions/ebooks" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://pragprog.com/frequently-asked-questions/ebooks"&gt;get it right too&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kjbuckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:51:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From TextMate to VIM for Rails Coders</title><link>http://zigzag.github.com/2010/02/14/from-textmate-to-vim-for-rails-coders.html#comment-35630760</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But in VIM, I have to fall back to the shell command like find . -type f|grep rb$|xargs grep xxx. Do you have any suggestion for it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Install &lt;a href="http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2572" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2572"&gt;ack.vim&lt;/a&gt; (and make sure you have ack itself on your system), then just type &lt;code&gt;:Ack xxx **/*.rb&lt;/code&gt; (or simply &lt;code&gt;:Ack xxx&lt;/code&gt; to search the whole project).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kjbuckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:26:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Testing Third Party HTTP APIs - Richard Livsey and Bartoz Blimke - Ruby Manor</title><link>http://effectif.com/ruby/manor/faking-http-requests-during-testing#comment-25830455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A while ago I had a similar problem, and cobbled together &lt;a href="http://github.com/kerryb/fakettp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://github.com/kerryb/fakettp"&gt;FakeTTP&lt;/a&gt;. It's a Sinatra app that you can post chunks of Ruby code to, to determine how it should respond to requests. Because it's a standalone app it's aimed at acceptance/integration testing rather than unit testing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's pretty basic, and for 99% of cases something like WebMock will be much more suitable, but FakeTTP might be useful if the code that makes the request isn't run directly from the code under test (maybe it's on the back of a queue, or for integration tests it might be another app altogether).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kjbuckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:40:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ruby Manor - Ruby</title><link>http://effectif.com/ruby/manor#comment-25754121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm probably being an idiot, but when I try to either follow a 'continue reading' link or go directly to eg &lt;a href="http://effectif.com/ruby/manor/short-order-ruby" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://effectif.com/ruby/manor/short-order-ruby"&gt;http://effectif.com/ruby/ma...&lt;/a&gt;, I get 301ed back to the main article page.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kjbuckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:22:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has Twitter finally mainstreamed syndication?</title><link>http://www.jasonkolb.com/weblog/2009/07/has-twitter-finally-mainstreamed-syndication.html#comment-13660495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess the difference with Twitter is that it's just a website (or it can be if you want it to).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's no messing around installing feedreaders or setting up Google Reader or whatever -- if you have a Twitter account already you just hit 'follow' and you're away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kjbuckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:00:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Homeworking builds teamwork &amp;#8211; and communities</title><link>http://steveellwood.com/2009/06/28/homeworking-builds-teamwork-and-communities/#comment-11859202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As you say, it depends on the type of work you're doing. I have a bad habit of forgetting that there are parts of the company (like, say, 99.9% of it or so) that aren't involved in writing software, but for those that are (or who have another team-based creative role), I think co-location is hugely beneficial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If your job doesn't involve working as part of a team (an actual team doing something together, not just a bunch of people under the same manager), then I expect home working is at least as effective as working in an office (and cheaper), as long as you don't end up isolated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kjbuckley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:51:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>