<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for khunhunter</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/khunhunter/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/khunhunter/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:24:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Like Most Teabaggers, Author John O&amp;#8217;Hara is Misinformed</title><link>http://blogs.alternet.org/dh1976/2010/04/21/like-most-teabaggers-author-john-ohara-is-misinformed/#comment-46103588</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm fairly certain that my six figure salary exceeds yours my friend.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Using a Leftist usual lack of knowledge you "ASSSume" that your income is higer, wrong again.  I own my own businesses and have done well even in this economy; although I have had to lay off valueable employees for no other reason than govt. mishandling and interferance.  And I always find it amusing when someone throws out how they make so much money, ergo their opinion is superior to all others, typical liberal rant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ONLY A LIBERAL would respond so stridently to my posts, the reason is obvious, you don't have facts or logical arguements so you just yell names.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; And the same dynamic existed under Bush...government has little say over anything anymore,&lt;br&gt;To quote one of our few political sages, "there you go again." Dems such as Barney Frank were and are behind the mortage debacle. Dems forced lendors to give mortgages to people who had no chance of repaying their mortgages including but not limited to allowing borrowers to get a mortage with "stated income" on the form, no way to check or verify that they made enough to realistically pay the mortage.  In addition, if you know someone who can read, write and has access to a library you can find out just how many Libs had their hands in the mortgage crisis and how many have their iincomes in offshore accounts.&lt;br&gt; it is the corporations that are in control and the extent to which they promote demonizing the federal govt as the cause of all problems depends on how well the administration serves their interests.  &lt;br&gt;Corporations do not have as much influence as you would like to believe regardless of the press; most recent legislation shows this.  However if you consider the "nonprofits" (and I use that word sarcastically) such as Acorn have far and away more influence and cause alot of damage to the individual and the country.&lt;br&gt;A corporate friendly one does not have corporate driven movements to demonize them, corporate threatening ones do, and they convince people to say that...&lt;br&gt;I have yet to see or hear from a corporate rep. who threatened or slandered the Fed. Govt.   however the reverse is and has been the rule of the day, with daily diatribes from liers and outright fools such as but not limited to Peolosi, Reid, Boxer, etc on and on and on. &lt;br&gt;By the way, companies and corporations, EMPLOY people make goods, sell goods and benefit people. Governments restrain, control and hurt people most of the time. No corporation imprisions people, Governements do. When companies make poor business decisions they GO OUT OF BUSINESS.  Not so for the Govt. they have a printing press and make their own money.  Companies have to live within their means or fail..Govts. just kick the can down the road for future generations to take care of. Corporations do no impinge on civil liberties, Govts. do with great regularity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is so much more but who cares, those that don't already knows will never get it, those that know it and can face reality, look out for themselves, take responsibility for their own conduct dont' need it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">khunhunter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:24:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Like Most Teabaggers, Author John O&amp;#8217;Hara is Misinformed</title><link>http://blogs.alternet.org/dh1976/2010/04/21/like-most-teabaggers-author-john-ohara-is-misinformed/#comment-46042236</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Either admit you're completely ignorant and just don't know the facts, or you're Republicans in silly costumes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps had you read the full entry, you would understand&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SO TYPICAL OF THE LEFT...NO MENTION OF THE SLANDER AND LIES THEY LEVIED AGAINST GW BUSH., NO MENITION OF THE FACTS THAT THE PRESENT PARTY CONTROLING THE FED GOVT IS CORRUPT, LIES TO THEIR CONSTITUENTS, IS ARROGANT AND WILL NOT LISTEN TO THE VOTERS.  Just the usual, "if you don't agree with me, your'e....." I read the article and understood it completely.  Now quickly all you out of work liberals, start yelling the liberal words, "you are a racist, you hate poor people, boo hoo, we are going to threaten you with violence and slander."  All great liberal comebacks, because it is obvious you can't argue on the facts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">khunhunter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:13:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Like Most Teabaggers, Author John O&amp;#8217;Hara is Misinformed</title><link>http://blogs.alternet.org/dh1976/2010/04/21/like-most-teabaggers-author-john-ohara-is-misinformed/#comment-45901863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am certain the same diatribes, spin doctors etc are saying much the same things in China, Iran, and in the early days of our republic the British govt. &lt;br&gt;"Tea Party" members/supporters are not by in large ignorant, racist etc.  but please don't let that stop you from slandering us (not that it would); if the truth those identifying themselves as on the left are in my experience very self centered myoptic people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">khunhunter</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:30:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/01/21/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6124970.shtml</title><link>http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/01/21/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6124970.shtml#comment-30889636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said my dull witted liberal friend.... I mean Edwards is a "man of da people" he has always helped us.....(yet I can imagine anything he has ever done to help anyone but himself)... An being such a great philanthropist, he refused to deny his mistress, out of wedlock children, I mean she must have asked for it!  And to soothe his wife's fears he "streatched the truth" about his affair to help her too! God the man is a saint! And on top of that, he was so considerate that even though it would have been much easier to "keep it in his pants, or practice safe sex", he went the extra mile and knocked up his mistress, lied to the electorate, and with an act of ultimate sensitivity, lied to his wife, in the hospital about the whole thing.  But wait don't forget, he has now sacrificed himself yet again, and instead of sending Doctors, nurses, healthcare practisioners or supplies, he took up a seat on a "voter paid for plane" and flew to Haiti so that he could, HELP EVERYONE YET AGAIN!&lt;br&gt;I predict he is on the "fast track to sainthood"! And "gufaw" to all you evil nay sayers...WE ALL KNOW THAT THIS ALL THE FAULT OF G.W. BUSH AND THOSE NASTY, EVIL CONSERVCATIVES AND THEIR LACKY REPUBLICAN LAP DOGS!  JUST LIKE HUGO CHAVEZ HAS SAID!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">khunhunter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:42:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/01/21/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6124970.shtml</title><link>http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/01/21/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6124970.shtml#comment-30888639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For heavens sake...be mericiful...Can you guys "imagine what it is like" if you are a low-life P.I. lawyer, who lied to your wife, lied to your mistress, lied to the electorate? No to mention that while your wife of many years is fighting for her life against breast cancer, you go out and "knock up" your mistress, then lie to everyone about it? Oh my God, "how would you like to have to be in the same house with her, ALONE, after that?  Besides, the boy probably sees an excellent chance at some "Haitian tail" from some poor, starving women in Port a Prince!  I mean be reasonable, the guy has needs!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">khunhunter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:32:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Supreme Court will Review Obama’s Citizenship</title><link>http://davidortez.com/2008/11/23/supreme-court-will-review-obama%E2%80%99s-citizenship#comment-3983021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This law suit was kicked a long time ago, it is old news.&lt;br&gt;The courts will not consider such a suit unless the person bringing the suit has&lt;br&gt;"legal standing" to bring it.  Perhaps if there is a lawyer or someone else in the legal profession viewing this blog they can add more detailed and cogent infromation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">khunhunter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>