<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for keithhanna</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/keithhanna/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/keithhanna/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:01:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The UCI Project, what it could mean for Iowa tech</title><link>http://www.techsentry.org/?p=260#comment-13414370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When the cloud subscriber needs to ensure the availability of the applications running in the cloud, they are going to demand SLA contracts.  Once that has been put on the table, then the cloud provider needs to have 'instrumentation' for the purpose of defining, measuring and reporting performance against contracted SLAs.  Will every cloud subscriber 'trust' the provider's infrastructure to spin up capacity real-time, dynamically?  Or, will their be a significant portion of the market that requires SLAs be established and met.  IMHO, we're never go to be 100% free of instrumentation, back office administration, reporting, etc...at least not across the broad marketplace of potential cloud subscribers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">keithhanna</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:01:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>