<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for karlgoldfield</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/karlgoldfield/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/karlgoldfield/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:40:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Politics In 140 Characters Or Less</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/columnists/politics-in-140-characters-or-less/#comment-1017621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This was a refreshing post and I believe that we will all find ourselves up against Web 2.0 questions. As a citizen, my choices may not be as severe as those who hold public office, but I want to take the challenge a bit further.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What should we do about the soon to be hundreds of trillions of words in cyberspace?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How will we effectively categorize people and content when everyone and everything somehow is linked to everything else (At least by the 3rd degree)?&lt;br&gt;, &lt;br&gt;and what is appropriate use of the internet by who's definition?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, I agree with this right wing and quite confilicted senator that they cannot take away his twitter. What they can do is penalize him for breaching federal regulations. If he does not like that, I have a wire tap, some inequalities in human rights, and a strong arm of segregation to shove in his face, along with the rest of his two Americas buddies in Congress.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">karlgoldfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:40:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prospecting Solution Sales &amp;#8211; Part 1 of 2</title><link>http://changeforge.com/prospecting-solution-sales-part-1-of-2/#comment-884389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With the objectives of proper prospecting one can take the traditional funnel mentality of the age old pipeline and turn it into a slightly slanted tube. The focus can be on activity that matters instead of activity for activity's sake.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great post and I will be back.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">karlgoldfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:21:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Reactor: On Patience (Week Two)</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/startup-reactor/startup-reactor-on-patience-week-two/#comment-727438</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post and point! I work with startups and this foolish mentality is common. I agree you have to spend money to make money, but there must be  a balance. Balance gets you to a tipping point, not abuse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">karlgoldfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:41:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>