<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for karlgilis</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/karlgilis/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/karlgilis/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:16:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Strake | The myth of the page fold: evidence from user testing</title><link>http://thestrake.com/post/207585789#comment-20708156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The page fold is not a myth. It’s reality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whether users want to scroll or not, depends on the type of page and the type of website.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A nice article illustrating when users want to scroll (and when not) can be found at &lt;a href="http://webusability-blog.com/page-fold-fact-or-fiction/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://webusability-blog.com/page-fold-fact-or-fiction/"&gt;http://webusability-blog.co...&lt;/a&gt;. It also gives some good examples of good use of the area above the page fold.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">karlgilis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:16:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The myth of the page fold: evidence from user testing | cxpartners &amp;rsaquo; Jon Aizlewood LifeStream</title><link>http://lifestream.carbongraffiti.com/items/view/3624/the-myth-of-the-page-fold-evidence-from-user-testing-cxpartners#comment-20708131</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The page fold is not a myth. It’s reality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whether users want to scroll or not, depends on the type of page and the type of website.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A nice article illustrating when users want to scroll (and when not) can be found at &lt;a href="http://webusability-blog.com/page-fold-fact-or-fiction/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://webusability-blog.com/page-fold-fact-or-fiction/"&gt;http://webusability-blog.co...&lt;/a&gt;. It also gives some good examples of good use of the area above the page fold.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">karlgilis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:16:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: betashop, The myth of the page fold: evidence from user testing</title><link>http://betashop.com/post/207334622#comment-20706244</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whether users want to scroll or not, depends from situation to situation. Visitors will not always scroll.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It depends on the type of page and the type of website.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A nice article illustrating when users want to scroll (and when not) can be found at &lt;a href="http://webusability-blog.com/page-fold-fact-or-fiction/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://webusability-blog.com/page-fold-fact-or-fiction/"&gt;http://webusability-blog.co...&lt;/a&gt;. It also gives some good examples of good use of the area above the page fold.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">karlgilis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:42:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>