<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kari_helgason</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/kari_helgason/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/kari_helgason/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:07:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: All women want to dress the same</title><link>http://www.stylehop.com/blog/2008/06/25/all-women-want-to-dress-the-same/#comment-744125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, I think you are absolutely right. Fashion can involve risks, but the very word itself means something that's stylish or accepted at the moment. The experienced fashionistas know exactly that. Those that take risks usually also have to know that in order to predict the future, know what will be accepted though it's not "fashion" at the exact moment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I also think this all goes for men as well. Though the menswear forest isn't nearly as big as the womenswear jungle, it also takes a lot of effort. Except menswear is much more codified and has stricter rules and therefore makes the risk-taking business even more difficult. Not taking risks there and following the exact fashion is probably easier though. Us men have a strict mold to fit into, and that's relatively easy, but breaking out of it is more difficult, as proven by Prada and Costume National recently.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kari_helgason</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:07:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>