<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jsnx</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jsnx/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jsnx/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:26:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Some Notes on Distributed Key Stores</title><link>https://randomfoo.net/2009/04/20/some-notes-on-distributed-key-stores#comment-8540288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would really like to know how this discussion turns out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Dusek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:26:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Ruby Dream A Shell?</title><link>http://www.metacircus.com/hacking/2009/03/17/does-ruby-dream-a-shell.html#comment-7350052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good show; but the distinction between builtins and ordinary executables is relatively great in this shell. That's what makes a shell, after all -- "first class" executables tied together with pipes and so on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Dusek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:53:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Tuesday: The Fiddly Bits</title><link>http://blog.urbantastic.com/post/81336210#comment-6627873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would be very interested to know more about why you left GAE.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Dusek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:12:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hacking the Amazon S3 SLA</title><link>http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2008-10-23-hacking-the-amazon-s3-sla.html#comment-6481558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Suppose that request fails; should he issue any more requests? Absolutely no... Suppose the request fails; should he issue any more requests? Absolutely..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both parts taken together are hard to make sense of.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Dusek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hacking the Amazon S3 SLA</title><link>http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2008-10-23-hacking-the-amazon-s3-sla.html#comment-6428631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Suppose that request fails; should he issue any more requests? Absolutely not: If his first request fails, the attacker has achieved a 100% Error Rate for that 5-minute interval. Suppose the request fails; should he issue any more requests? Absolutely: Zero failed requests out of one request means an Error Rate of zero, and issuing more requests can't make that any worse.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You mean, "Suppose the request succeeds; should he issue any more requests?" ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Dusek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:44:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>