Disqus - Latest Comments for jschwimmer

Re: http://blog.jayparkinsonmd.com/post/21853869585

Joshua Schwimmer — Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:32:59 -0000

Awesome. But where did you put the framed human hair sculpture?

Re: http://infosnack.net/post/19847558793

Joshua Schwimmer — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:38:41 -0000

Also check out "Don't Shoot the Dog".

Re: Sleep No More One-On-One with Malcolm

Joshua Schwimmer — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:19:51 -0000

SPOILER ALERT: MACBETH DIES AT THE END.

Re: http://infosnack.net/post/16116858918

Joshua Schwimmer — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:45:44 -0000

$50 or so more per year if you have a subscription.

Re: http://infosnack.net/post/14387308321

Joshua Schwimmer — Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:15:56 -0000

My answer here: http://www.explainxkcd.com/...

(A couple of quibbles in retrospect but mostly right.)

Re: http://infosnack.net/post/14191020865

Joshua Schwimmer — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:42:12 -0000

Whoops, spoke too soon.

Re: Begin

Joshua Schwimmer — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:33:27 -0000

You're a true fan. True 650? Oh my god.

Re: Sleep No More Spoilers

Joshua Schwimmer — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:26:33 -0000

Thanks! (I wish there was a wiki...)

Re: http://infosnack.net/post/11069036578

Joshua Schwimmer — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:58:52 -0000

Got it. Turned "scale images" off.

Re: Think Like a Doctor: A Father Loses Strength

Joshua Schwimmer — Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:01:30 -0000

(Hint: Answer 20 - 21 on the New York Times comment is the right one.)

Re: http://infosnack.net/post/1005155157

Joshua Schwimmer — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:32:24 -0000

I'd love a copy of this poster. Does anyone know where to get one?

Re: http://infosnack.net/post/3920376767

Joshua Schwimmer — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:39:22 -0000

Don't think so!

But, oh man, they just introduced "click to delete" organs... goo.gl/q8eqE

Re: http://infosnack.net/post/3157784258

Joshua Schwimmer — Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:49:34 -0000

(This is for all you photo nerds.)

Conditions, mostly — it was a handheld shot during the wedding parade at 5:30 AM and I processed the hell out of it with Noise Ninja. Surprising how well it came out.

Re: http://infosnack.net/post/2424448991

Joshua Schwimmer — Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:57:59 -0000

Tor doesn't provide encryption, just anonymity. I highly recommend luxsci.com, which is what I use to send encrypted email to patients and other physicians. Thanks for reading. Feel free to comment anytime.

Re: Your Next Stethoscope Should Be Electronic. Here's Why. (Littmann Electronic Stethoscope Model 3000 Review)

Joshua Schwimmer — Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:17:10 -0000

I suspect iPod headphones would look undoctorly.

Re: http://infosnack.net/post/1417902237

Joshua Schwimmer — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:10:15 -0000

That post was just sitting there, patiently waiting for your response.

I'd never seen anything like that before, either.

Re: http://infosnack.net/post/1431715429

Joshua Schwimmer — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:56:06 -0000

Kevin,

Thanks for the comment. Hopefully companies will soon start using the iPhone 4 as a control panel for medical devices...

Re: http://jschwimmer.net/post/825502985

Joshua Schwimmer — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:38:36 -0000

Test

Re: http://jschwimmer.net/post/949093423

Joshua Schwimmer — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:12:12 -0000

Test comment.

Re: http://jschwimmer.net/post/825502985

Joshua Schwimmer — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:05:56 -0000

Occasionally byzantine, but fun. I'd more enthusiastically recommend China Miéville and Richard Morgan.

Re: http://jschwimmer.net/post/802785383

Joshua Schwimmer — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:12:42 -0000

In a big way, too. Here's the CR blog entry, which they posted a immediately after my comment:

http://blogs.consumerreport...

In practice, I personally find the antenna thing to be a non-issue.

(Aside from the antenna problem, the iPhone 4 is CR's highest rates smartphone: http://www.macrumors.com/20... ).

Re: http://jschwimmer.net/post/676553828

Joshua Schwimmer — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:18:07 -0000

Dialysis. Did fine!

Re:

Joshua Schwimmer — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:07:18 -0000

Sure. I wouldn't have thought of it, but apparently it worked 4/5
times the Russians tried to seal an oil leak with an underground
nuclear explosion. So there's apparently some precedent. I'm mostly
curious as to whether the nuclear option is even on the table.

Re: http://jschwimmer.net/post/610635313

Joshua Schwimmer — Thu, 20 May 2010 08:57:28 -0000

Updated references to the ACCORD and INVEST trials in the post.

Re: http://jschwimmer.net/post/610635313

Joshua Schwimmer — Wed, 19 May 2010 10:34:35 -0000

Thanks, Joel!