<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for joshleejosh</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/joshleejosh/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/joshleejosh/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 00:36:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Check Out A New Trailer For Orange Is The New Black Season 2</title><link>http://previously.tv/orange-is-the-new-black/check-new-trailer-orange-new-black-season-2/#comment-1344341164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, I'm pretty pumped.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 00:36:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watch Stevie Nicks Sing On American Horror Story</title><link>http://previously.tv/american-horror-story/watch-stevie-nicks-sing-american-horror-story/#comment-1194656402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Her voice isn't what it used to be, but she's also singing in a small room, not on a stage where she can work up to a full belt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The important question is: does she sound better here than she did on Up All Night?&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TwEEmpEa4w" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TwEEmpEa4w"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:13:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which British Game Shows Could Work In America, And How?</title><link>http://previously.tv/television/british-game-shows-work-america/#comment-1159114007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is all I can ever think of when anyone brings up University Challenge: &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxA0a5G6ccg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxA0a5G6ccg"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/wat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:00:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does The Super-Hot Melissa McCarthy Bring The Heat to Mike &amp;#038; Molly?</title><link>http://previously.tv/mike-and-molly/mike-molly-worth-digging/#comment-1110123908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Boozy Swoosie Kurtz? I might have to give this a shot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 15:47:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Set Your DVR For Late-Night Samurai Jack Reruns</title><link>http://previously.tv/samurai-jack/set-dvr-late-night-samurai-jack-reruns/#comment-1095784645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's also on Netflix. I watched the pilot recently: it's not as crazily inventive as the rest of the series, but incredibly well drawn and paced, with an epic scope. Tartakovsky at his best. (Sorry, Dexter's Lab.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:39:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Bitch Is Back</title><link>http://previouslytv.wpengine.com/revenge/bitch-back/#comment-1091777067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm so relieved that this show has pulled out of the skid (knock wood). I actually think that reestablishing its bonafides as a melodrama has made the drama-drama more effective: refocusing everything on Emily vs. the Graysons instead of the Initiative or whatnot means that I care about Jack for the first time maybe ever -- even if he's destined to be revenge roadkill, I like that he's now the headstrong damsel that Emily is trying to keep out of distress and on a pedestal. And her arc with Father Paul -- revenging him, then doling out forgiveness but demanding penance, then being reminded that she's not *actually* God -- was legit interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mostly I'm just glad that the show is about Emily again. (That, and Nolan's outfits, which have been reaching new heights.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:46:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Did Witches Of East End Cast A Spell On Us?</title><link>http://previously.tv/witches-of-east-end/witches-east-end-cast-spell-us/#comment-1073965248</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I stumbled onto this last night, and enjoyed it way more than I expected. Based on the premise, I thought it was going to be 10 episodes of the daughters *not quite* figuring out what's up, so I liked seeing things hit the fan right away. And eternal motherhood as a curse is a really interesting hook.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 15:05:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Peter Capaldi Is A Doctor Who Gamechanger</title><link>http://previously.tv/doctor-who/peter-capaldi-is-a-doctor-who-gamechanger/#comment-989642204</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As far as continuity catchup goes, you probably just need to pay attention to the most recent season and find out what's up with the current companion. Everything else is basic knowledge (the TARDIS is bigger on the inside; Daleks are evil), something that's going to be rebooted/recast whenever it comes back around (the Master), or is too convoluted to be worth working through unless you're really invested (River).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The important Clara episodes are "Asylum of the Daleks," "The Snowmen" (beware some carnivore garbage bin-ness here), "Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS", and "The Name of the Doctor." "Hide" was probably my favorite episode from this last season.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Be wary of this fall's 50th Anniversary special. It's going to be heavy on history and will almost certainly be an extreme example of the show going way, way up its own ass (I say this affectionately and with great eagerness).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 18:00:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Peter Capaldi Is A Doctor Who Gamechanger</title><link>http://previously.tv/doctor-who/peter-capaldi-is-a-doctor-who-gamechanger/#comment-989641346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My general attitude is Doctor Who:UK::Godzilla:Japan. It takes some suspension of disbelief -- and possibly of good taste -- to enjoy it, but the goofiness is a key part of its charm.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 17:59:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That's Edutainment!</title><link>http://previously.tv/histeria/thats-edutainment/#comment-934607005</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, I totally slept on this one... aaaand just lost the morning to clip-watching. Those fat baby things are kind of` horrifying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:33:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Death Of A Bunch Of Showgirls</title><link>http://previously.tv/smash/death-of-a-bunch-of-showgirls/#comment-912196421</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the Bollywood number was the series' high point -- if you can't be good, be weird.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 03:08:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Revenge' Is A Dish Best Served To Someone Else</title><link>http://previously.tv/revenge/revenge-is-a-dish-best-served-to-someone-else/#comment-896426187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"glize"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:12:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Revenge' Is A Dish Best Served To Someone Else</title><link>http://previously.tv/revenge/revenge-is-a-dish-best-served-to-someone-else/#comment-896167009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's hoping the new showrunner culls the herd and just makes every episode 40 minutes of Emily and Victoria smiling/glaring (what is the opposite of "smize?") at each other.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:49:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Farewell to The Richmond District: A Love Letter</title><link>http://ohheygreat.tumblr.com/post/4272110154#comment-177062824</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This was really wonderful. I hope your new place can be as inspiring and home-y.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 17:40:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Uppity Stuff</title><link>http://kellydeal.tumblr.com/post/174168903#comment-15546858</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Truly, NE was Maurice Starr's greatest gift to us all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:00:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Uppity Stuff</title><link>http://kellydeal.tumblr.com/post/79877483#comment-6425908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The nice thing about Twitter is that it's easy to ignore the celebs and their wannabe-hangers-on, and only pay attention to people who are awesome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The hard part for me isn't having celebs *on* Twitter, it's all the NYT/WaPo/Dubuque Herald stories *about* Twitter. They're painful in the way that it's painful to hear people on TV carefully pronounce the word "blog."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Twitter ever does get totally lame and overblown, we'll all just have to start hanging out at &lt;a href="http://poolfullofbooze.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="poolfullofbooze.com"&gt;poolfullofbooze.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:21:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Videogamey Talk</title><link>http://www.videogamey.com/misc/talk/#comment-3036391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I downloaded this, and then promptly forgot about it, as I seem to do with most iPhone games that aren't on the first page of my home screen. But today, while I was waiting for one of many EXTREMELY late trains on my way home, I remembered it, and happily wasted a bunch of time spitting out triangles and beating the crap out of Orange. Good thing, too -- I was almost bored enough to start reading the book in my bag. Thanks Galcon, for rescuing me from literacy!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:36:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Videogamey Talk</title><link>http://www.videogamey.com/misc/talk/#comment-2907757</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I managed to beat Galaxy Man, but every other level I've tried has kicked my ass.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm trying to just have fun with the game and not too think too much about what it says about gaming, because what it says kind of pisses me off: "Let's just discard everything we've learned about making games in the last 20 years -- except for named achievements. Those can stay." It's no Pac-Man: Championship Edition, that's for sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Videogamey Talk</title><link>http://www.videogamey.com/misc/talk/#comment-2816713</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm psyched about Sin and Punishment 2. Don't know what the point of all that GameCube rereleasery is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This new format terrifies me. I fear change! I'll try to cope.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshleejosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:09:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>