<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jomel77</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jomel77/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jomel77/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2021 00:26:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AMERICA - VENTURE HIGHWAY LYRICS</title><link>http://www.songlyrics.com/america/venture-highway-lyrics/#comment-5641331022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The song title is "Ventura Highway" - not "Venture Highway"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jomel77</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2021 00:26:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
        I’m Considering Living Happily Married Under Two Separate Roofs
    </title><link>https://www.xonecole.com/living-apart-together-why-im-considering-living-happily-married-under-two-separate-roofs/?share_id=4635931#comment-4486082485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love reading LATting articles! Thank you for sharing your thoughts. With all due respect, as an experienced LATter for nearly seven years with Meryl whom I don't deserve, I take exception to all of your "cons". 1) Trust is dependent upon the health of the relationship, not the degree of convenience. 2) It not for children or invalids. 2) I RELISH showing the world how happy I am with Meryl as we separately pay for our groceries. The only "con" I can think of is the added expense of 2 residences v 1. Thanks again for sharing Mika, and yes, you are not alone. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jomel77</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2019 02:12:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Full Quarter Total Projection (on+off)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/full_quarter.html#comment-50229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I guess it's not "meaningless" - just misleading.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jomel77</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:29:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Full Quarter Total Projection (on+off)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/full_quarter.html#comment-50225</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I vote to 86 the blue line - it's meaningless.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jomel77</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:28:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Offline Total</title><link>http://www.ronpaulgraphs.com/offline_total.html#comment-50212</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So the blip of around $150k includes the off-line on 12/16?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jomel77</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>