<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for johnkooz</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/johnkooz/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/johnkooz/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:06:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: NerdCoach Episode 3: AutoKey &amp;#8211; Superb Automatic Text-Expander for Linux</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2012/autokey_textexpander/#comment-604707641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Given the responses to this article I will very very likely either a)add more on text-expansion productivity to this article and/or (more likely) b) have another article on more advanced text-expansion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:06:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NerdCoach Episode 3: AutoKey &amp;#8211; Superb Automatic Text-Expander for Linux</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2012/autokey_textexpander/#comment-604706093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To conclude (at least for now) my lengthy sequence of (genuinely excited!) responses to your comment:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm partially convinced this distinction of a "professional text-expander user' is practically entirely (&amp;gt;90%) total hokum and something you devised to more effectively sell phraseexpress.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's nothing wrong with phraseexpress as a windows os option for text-expansion, but if you could provide details onto defining "Text-Expansion at a Pro Level" the idea of professional text-expansion might seem less ridiculous, or even very clear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:04:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NerdCoach Episode 3: AutoKey &amp;#8211; Superb Automatic Text-Expander for Linux</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2012/autokey_textexpander/#comment-604699866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;What other uses are there other than mainly&lt;br&gt;commonly used code&lt;br&gt;frequently typed sentences&lt;br&gt;date format strings and more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I journal extensively (insane amounts of journaling) and one thing I have used text expanders for me (on likely a very non-pro level) is separators (just ascii text separations to distinction different entries as well as precise date-time stamps) and other things.  I'm aware of 'journaling apps', but I rarely like putting data in some software app because of frequently migrating OSes or changing apps.  I've learned simplest types of files (spreadsheets, text files, and the like) protect me from being glued to an app (like losing tags or something, which I don't have to worry about).  I've dealt with extracting my files out of an app and havoc of that on too many occasions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An example is productivity apps.  Some productivity apps make it easy to put yoru 'todos' on a text file or some other app, but some are very cumbersome.  Try extracting over 50 todos from google tasks, for example!  Enormous headache.  With productivity appeage I've evolved into (hopefully, eventually) making my own productivity app, but text files works best after using/testing &lt;br&gt;Read-Set-Do&lt;br&gt;Omni's products&lt;br&gt;Cultured Codes' Things&lt;br&gt;Reminder fox&lt;br&gt;google tasks&lt;br&gt;and many more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This could be genuine dislike and/or incompatibility with those programs, but most likely it's just wanting to code my own productivity app.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BACK to Text-Expanders....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Typeit4me.&lt;br&gt;Are you familiar with that one?  That was the first text expander I ever used and had a brief email correspondence with that UK coder.  That was a superb text-expander that offered a lot of advanced features that were fairly accessible. How do you compare phraseexpress to that text-expander.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, AutoKey does have a few less 'advanced features' but my point is, for my purspoes, those 'missing advanced features' are not missing at all.  Autokey accomplishes precisely what it needs to, nothing more is needed, and additional features would make the nifty (fairly bug-free app) likely unnecessarily bloated.  Most people think 'more features' is always a plus, but I've evolved into preferring bloat-free apps ftw.  I'm not implying phraseexpress has unnecessary features, but rather that Autokey suffices and that sufficiency is is not inadequate in anyway, in many ways it's very complete.  (but re windows os, phraseexpress is stellar).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I still can't believe you coded that. that's so awesome!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:57:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NerdCoach Episode 3: AutoKey &amp;#8211; Superb Automatic Text-Expander for Linux</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2012/autokey_textexpander/#comment-604677841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"easy to use interface to setup their abbreviations and a software that assists them and adapts to the way they work"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's probably the text-book definition goal of every text-expander to have ever been coded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I understand you prefer phraseexpress (why not? you made that?! That's so awesome!), so you will have a natural tendency to look down on other expansion apps.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe you could enlighten on some special usages of text-expansion for advanced professionals (possibly as a guest writer or as comment response)?!  Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I Guess I'm saying two things:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1.  Avoiding you framing phrase-express as having advanced features that go unused by most users, that other text-expansions do not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2.  Wanting to learn more advanced text-expansion tricks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I could see how you doing a guest article on this site specifically on text-expansion (possibly only with phraseexpress) might be illuminating (for some kind of "Advanced Text-Expansion" part 2).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But a part of me is not buying the 'professionals' and non-professional distinction.  Who the heck is a 'professional text expander user'?  If anyone uses text-expansion imho they're inherently fairly professional as-is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously an honour.  Thanks again for comment!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:36:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NerdCoach Episode 3: AutoKey &amp;#8211; Superb Automatic Text-Expander for Linux</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2012/autokey_textexpander/#comment-604669392</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Author-Coder of PhraseExpander?!! Wow! Woah! What an honour (srsly)!  this is awesome! Would you be interested in writing a guest tech post?  How did you stumble upon this article!  What a treat!  Thanks for the comment! Superb Wow!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;re your response&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What do you mean b y 'raw functionality'?  That seems to imply that Autohotkey is incredibly limited, which I completely disagree.  For windows OS phraseexpress is my preferred text expander (but obv. AutoHotKey for linux).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many special features are untouched by most users.  I see what you mean by paid text expanders offering more 'time saving' (key-tapping-saving) scripts and automatic expansions, but the advanced features of (as you said, usually paid) text expanders I think really are neglected and therefore not worth the cost (unless of course the person is a text-expanding guru-expert).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From what I've seen, much of the 'advanced features' of (often as you said, 'paid') text expanders is that those advanced features are so 'advanced' that anyone who would use them would be fairly close to being able to possibly design their own text expander app.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe some text expanders' advanced features have simpler implementation than others, but some 'advanced features' often involve a lot of cryptic format strings (especially with date and time) that are incomprehensible to most users.  Personally, I love customization with format strings (like arranging the year/date/month to output a text-expanded timestamp precisely as how one would want it to look and time-date text-expansions are an example of a frequent auto expansion that has a lot of preferences (arrangement and display of y/m/d).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;" The main advantage for professionals"...I must say I resent your implication which seemed to be that people whom use AutoKey are NOT professionals, which is incredibly not true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How would you define a " Professional Text-Expander User"?????&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I shared ways I use text expansion in the original post and listed a few more ways.  What other ways do YOU use text expansion? Considering that you actually MADE (wow that's awesome) that app, how you utilize text expansion would probably be much more interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personally, I use text-expansion for code, date-time formats, frequently used sentences.  Basically, the only and best things to use text-expansion for.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;how do you distinguish a "Professional" froma non-professional. All in all (correct me if there is more to this) but it IS just merely a text-expansion application.  It's a convenience. it's not an IDE or something incredibly elaborate.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:28:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Atheism FTW: SAGAN! The Man! Astronomy-Physics Cosmos Awesomeness</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2012/atheism-ftw-sagan-the-man-astronomy-physics-cosmos-awesomeness/#comment-602734712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you know...upon reading and being mindful of your response (and the professionalism of it)..I realized atheism is unquestionably a hobby of mine and important, but it's a fun knowledge interest.  My expertise is more with computers and other content on validateyourlife. however, a)good to get a response from someone is knowledgeable on those two blokes and b)no problem with blogging and podcasting on a topic that you like (even if aren't as savvy with it as other areas)...no problem at all!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 04:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Atheism FTW: SAGAN! The Man! Astronomy-Physics Cosmos Awesomeness</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2012/atheism-ftw-sagan-the-man-astronomy-physics-cosmos-awesomeness/#comment-602709561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thesauros, Would you be interested in writing a guest-column for a science or Atheism FTW article on the site?  Please respond with the site Contact form if interested.  Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 04:15:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Atheism FTW: SAGAN! The Man! Astronomy-Physics Cosmos Awesomeness</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2012/atheism-ftw-sagan-the-man-astronomy-physics-cosmos-awesomeness/#comment-602662369</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You sound like you could be a professor of cosmology (srsly)!  And you seem incredibly versed in Sagan and Dawkins, sharing some beautiful quotes.  But alas, I must ask (as Chris Pirillo once asked me in a tweet lol), what IS your point?  Were you adding (admitted your comment was highly eloquent) details to a post that you yourself wanted to write? (sounds like, possibly tbh).  Were you refuting something?  Whatever the reason, I wouldn't be surprised if you said you had written a book on something related to dawkins and sagan given eloquence of response.  Cheers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 03:35:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NerdCoach Episode 3: AutoKey &amp;#8211; Superb Automatic Text-Expander for Linux</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2012/autokey_textexpander/#comment-591702926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To each his own, but after sampling (and thoroughly utilizing) Typeit4me, TextExpander, PhraseExpress/Expander, and Autokey, I prefer the linux Autokey.  But again, raw functionality, they're relatively similar, but enormously huge computational time-saver. Awesome!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:14:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NerdCoach Episode 3: AutoKey &amp;#8211; Superb Automatic Text-Expander for Linux</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2012/autokey_textexpander/#comment-591700671</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Merlin Mann was right when he said that something like some tech stuff is not necessarily 'ponzi scheme-ish' (an analogy I really dislike), but a lot of similar ideas.  PhraseExpress is superb and I meant that instead of PhraseExpander.  Thanks for the comment!  When you consider raw functionality, however, if you type a shortcut and the text effectively expands, that's all that's needed . A few text expanders had built-in variables (like date/time formatting) which was convenient.  Whatever the app; very nifty tech-computer utility.  Good that linux has its own flavour of textexpander's, too!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:07:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Things I Dislike About iOS</title><link>http://www.lockergnome.com/ios/2012/06/22/10-things-i-dislike-about-ios/#comment-566538464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I hate iTunes with a passion that cannot be described — as this is a family website."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I liked that comment-quote.  I hated the infection of the appstore when just wanting to listen to my music/voice mp3s on hard drive.  After migrating away from itunes in 2008, I have since discovered a lot of music players. some have various advantages.  &lt;br&gt;vlc is great and reads everything.&lt;br&gt;obscure ones that I like are jaangle, audacious, i liked banshee for awhile. wmp suffices, too.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 05:12:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Are Today&amp;#8217;s Tablet Users and Why Have They Become So Important?</title><link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2012/06/22/who-are-todays-tablet-users-why-have-they-become-so-important/#comment-566383760</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Maybe I'm idiotically reading it but , ummm don't' the numbers on the graphs NOT add up to 100???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:37:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Are Today&amp;#8217;s Tablet Users and Why Have They Become So Important?</title><link>http://www.lockergnome.com/blade/2012/06/22/who-are-todays-tablet-users-why-have-they-become-so-important/#comment-566343601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;loved the graphs in this article.  I am a "Other Android" category person haha.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:11:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: [How To] Quickly Convert ogv to avi Video Files in Ubuntu</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/09/how-to-convert-ogv-avi-ubuntu#comment-490256855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You script is marvelous and clever. Great! It has a bug/error though that prevents the ogv files from being found.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LINE 11: mencoder “$1″ -ovc xvid -oac mp3lame -xvidencopts pass=1 -o $filename.avi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;should be&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LINE 11: mencoder $1 -ovc xvid -oac mp3lame -xvidencopts pass=1 -o $filename.avi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in ubuntu 10.04 it wasn't finding the .ogvs because it was looking for &lt;br&gt;"video1.ogv"&lt;br&gt;instead of &lt;br&gt;video1.ogv&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another way to convert ogv to avi (that I found thanks to a youtube vid) is DeVede.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers. VERY helpful and awesome post!!!! Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:03:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: [How To] Quickly Convert ogv to avi Video Files in Ubuntu</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/09/how-to-convert-ogv-avi-ubuntu#comment-490221003</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Hey that's awesome!!!  I don't really like openshot. may use it later.  it seems a bit meh, but that's AMAZING awesome impressive you made that. haha WOW!  Anyways. I tried your og2avi script.  I like that script and it says File not found when the .ogvs are in home folder.  Also my first and middle name is John Thomas similar to yours (I know that means willy in british, but meh, that's my first and middle name lol). Congrats on making that program.  this site looks awesome too.  I think linux is the best os.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 08:28:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: [How To] Quickly Convert ogv to avi Video Files in Ubuntu</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/09/how-to-convert-ogv-avi-ubuntu#comment-490218489</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you MADE" openshot? IF so, wow that's impressive.  I don't like that video editor (no offense) butvery impressive if so. Holy shit.  wow congrats!! anyways I don't like using that. may tinker later. wow that's impressive!  &lt;br&gt;okay I installed that script (awesome script!) and it can't find the files returns File not found and am including the .ogv and their in home folder?? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 08:26:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Want to Accelerate Your Usage of Time and Productivity? Try Pomodoro!</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2011/want-to-accelerate-your-usage-of-time-and-productivity-try-pomodoro/#comment-465817773</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Jana, &lt;br&gt;Thanks for the feedback (and especially positive feedback)!! That helps and keeps me going!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for pomodoro...yeah it's pretty awesome.  But as I said in the post it's pretty simple too.  It's just using 25-minute works sessiosn with 5-minute breaks.  It's not rocket science.  But to each his/her own.  It is a cool way of looking at time.  And for someone trying to focus on entrepreneur stuff (meaning less appointments, typically) using time chunks (like pomodoros or however long) is more practical than normal time calendar in some ways.  Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-- John&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 04:13:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ‘I think therefore I am’ Origins</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2011/i-think-therefore-i-am-origins/#comment-465811519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pure opinion, but I say neither.  Cartesian dualism and special relativity.  Both great...but they both stood on the shoulders of giants and both used prev mathematicians/philosophers/scientists for their breakthroughs. Thus, I say neither.  But I will say that Descartes was a French and I ahve lived in france so I have a preference for that (but Albert changed the way physicists look at science and the world).  I'd say descartes is overlooked but had huge impact.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 03:59:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Minimalism and &amp;#8216;Possibly Useful But Discardable&amp;#8217; Items</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2012/minimalism-and-possibly-useful-but-discardable-items/#comment-465807136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thomas!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;THanks for responding, mate!! I wanted to earn and have career be linked to blog/site/books/podcast.  Podcasting is my dream of sorts (at least currently) the fact that you seemingly listened to and then responded ON SITE (I am still working out how to respond on site as comment LOL) is VERY confidence-inducing, makes me happy, is inspiring, really opens my eyes. you just wrote a sentence, but it is VERY meaningful. THANKS for the encouragement.  Oath!! I will prob post this on site as response to comment. cheers!&lt;br&gt;-- John&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW. This is an excerpt from my BOOK.  I spent a LONG time writing that book (2 years +) and got all jazzed up to record this excerpt from it. I am proud of this recording and thinks it's quality, too.  Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 03:50:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eight Email Mistakes to Avoid</title><link>http://www.lockergnome.com/social/2012/01/19/eight-email-mistakes-to-avoid/#comment-415999443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;9.  Using Apples' &lt;a href="http://Mail.app" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Mail.app"&gt;Mail.app&lt;/a&gt; (??? wtf?? that's such a rubbish email program, imho in photo.  Thunderbird and gmail webmail are great).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:13:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Elementary:  Don&amp;#8217;t Demolish Doyle&amp;#8217;s (Sherlock Holmes&amp;#8217; Creator) Domain!</title><link>http://www.validateyourlife.com/blog/2010/2577/#comment-407048227</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi thanks for the (positive) feedback!  It's Elementary, really ;D I don't get paid for maintaining this blog, so encouragement, at the very least, is very useful, much appreciated, snd genuinely helps a lot! Cheers.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:11:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Start a Podcast in WordPress</title><link>http://www.coachradio.tv/how-to-start-a-podcast-in-wordpress#comment-314434921</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Blubrry stats are posting.  I can customize the audio player.  Libsyn seems like it's for nubs.  I'll likely (70% certainty) cancel my libsyn account and just use blubrry.  1/4 of the cost per month.  If I hit bandwidth probs I can just host them elsewhere.  Blubrry and libsyn are both syndication.  As far as I gather libsyn is pre-rss mainstream days, it's overpriced, and blubrry updates its stats more frequently ( I spend past couple of hours testing stat update times and what not).  anyways, good to know of podcasting-hosting options.  The main goal was just to track stats and blubrry (when I actually took the time to configure it ) does that.  Libsyn is sleek and looks cool, but if it doesn't udpate as quickly and other things no point in paying monthly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:16:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 10 Most Persuasive Dudes in Movies</title><link>http://www.persuasive.net/the-10-most-persuasive-dues-in-movies#comment-25904453</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"juxtaposition, repetition, brevity, appeal to higher value" sounds interesting and good things to know to avoid persuasion haha.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:31:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 10 Most Persuasive Dudes in Movies</title><link>http://www.persuasive.net/the-10-most-persuasive-dues-in-movies#comment-25904382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool list, aj.  An interesting post might be on if people have actually encountered people like the characters depicted in your ten clips -- either in persuasive ability, income-earning ability, or similar style -- IRL!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not much of a fan of some of the movies, but heck, Coffee is for Closers has got to be the best one IMHO out o that list. so funny.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:29:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 4 Reasons Why Gary Vaynerchuk is so Incredibly Persuasive</title><link>http://www.persuasive.net/blog/top-4-reasons-why-gary-vaynerchuk-is-incredibly-persuasive/#comment-14835807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent nice, concise tips:&lt;br&gt;Niche.&lt;br&gt;Animated.&lt;br&gt;Authority. &lt;br&gt;No BS. (or Genuineness to eliminate negation toxic language).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like the concise conclusion. cheers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Thomas Kooz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:15:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>